Arthroscopy & Endoscopy¶
Elbow arthroscopy: indications for loose bodies, OCD, epicondylitis, and PL impingement; technique & complication mitigation.
Overview¶
Therapeutic arthroscopy represents the logical extension of diagnostic arthroscopy [1], with surgery under endoscopic control now a practical reality [1]. Elbow arthroscopy has evolved from a primarily diagnostic tool to a therapeutic procedure with expanded indications [8]. Successful application requires careful attention to surgical anatomy and patient selection to avoid neurovascular complications [8]. The technique is considered relatively safe [13] and demonstrates low complication rates in community-based practice [14].
Complication profiles vary by study level and setting. Predominantly low-level evidence studies demonstrate varying complication rates after elbow arthroscopy, with a median of 3% and a range of 0%-71% [20]. In broader series, complications are seen in approximately 14% of cases [2], with most being minor [4]. Major complications occur in 5% of cases, often requiring repeat surgery [4]. However, when performed in a standardized fashion, elbow arthroscopy has a 0.5% rate of major complications [17]. Reoperation rates vary, with a median of 2% and a range of 0%-59% [20]. The procedure also has applications in the pediatric population with an acceptable safety profile [23].
Specific indications demonstrate efficacy and safety. Arthroscopic management of the post-traumatic stiff elbow may produce satisfactory results [3], with experienced surgeons producing results superior to open release given proper indications [3]. Debridement of the arthritic elbow shows no increase in complications, confirming its safety and efficacy [6]. For lateral epicondylitis, the arthroscopic tennis elbow release is an excellent addition to the surgeon's armamentarium [18], yielding satisfactory results in most patients [18] and results superior to other measures [18].
Anatomy & Pathophysiology¶
Elbow arthroscopy is a reliable and effective treatment for elbow pathology, driven by improved instrumentation, advanced surgical techniques, and a deeper understanding of anatomy [37]. However, the procedure demands careful attention to surgical anatomy to avoid neurovascular complications [8]. Safe execution requires appropriate knowledge of both articular and periarticular structures [9], as well as a clear understanding of the anatomy necessary to safely access the joint [36].
Neurovascular Safety: Knowledge of neurovascular anatomy is critical to prevent severe nerve injuries during elbow arthroscopic release of contractures [44]. Endoscopic anterior capsulectomy for severe elbow contractures is technically difficult and should be performed exclusively by experienced surgeons familiar with the neurovascular and musculoligamentous elbow anatomy [30].
Portal Visualization: Needle arthroscopy through an anterior transbrachial portal allows complete visualization of the anterior and posterolateral compartments of the elbow through the humerus-radius-ulna space [34].
Classification¶
Evolution and Scope: Elbow arthroscopy has evolved from a diagnostic tool to a therapeutic procedure with expanded indications [8]. Therapeutic arthroscopy is considered a logical extension of diagnostic arthroscopy [1], and surgery under endoscopic control is a practical reality [1]. Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy of the elbow is an accepted treatment modality for numerous conditions [10].
Complication Profile: Complications of elbow arthroscopy occur in approximately 14% of cases [2, 4]. Most complications are minor [4], whereas major complications occur in 5% of cases and often require repeat surgery [4]. Careful attention to surgical anatomy and careful patient selection are required to avoid neurovascular complications [8]. Elbow arthroscopy can be performed safely with appropriate knowledge of articular and periarticular anatomy, precise surgical technique, and understanding of the procedure's limitations [9].
Post-Traumatic Stiff Elbow: Arthroscopic management of the post-traumatic stiff elbow may produce satisfactory results [3]. Open release of the post-traumatic stiff elbow may also produce satisfactory results [3]. However, arthroscopy by experienced surgeons produces results superior to open release for the post-traumatic stiff elbow given proper indications [3].
Plica Syndrome: Diagnosis of plica syndrome rests on clinical history and physical examination [5]. Diagnosis is confirmed by arthroscopy or arthrotomy [5].
Loose Bodies: Elbow arthroscopy is most successful for removing loose bodies [10].
Tennis Elbow Release: The arthroscopic technique for tennis elbow release is an excellent addition to the surgeon's armamentarium [18]. This technique yields satisfactory results in most patients [18] and yields results superior to other measures [18].
Posterolateral Rotatory Instability (PLRI): A new intraoperative arthroscopic classification tool exists for posterolateral elbow instability (PLRI) [31]. This classification tool allows for arthroscopic assessment of PLRI [31] and serves as a standardized grading system for further research and communication between orthopedic surgeons [31].
Clinical Presentation¶
Elbow arthroscopy has evolved from a diagnostic tool to a therapeutic procedure with expanded indications [8]. Therapeutic arthroscopy is the logical extension of diagnostic arthroscopy, making surgery under endoscopic control a practical reality [1]. Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy of the elbow is an accepted treatment modality for numerous conditions, most successful for removing loose bodies [10]. Arthroscopy of the elbow provides diagnostic and therapeutic benefits, particularly for loose bodies and synovitis [26].
Diagnosis of plica syndrome rests on clinical history and physical examination but is confirmed by arthroscopy or arthrotomy [5]. Arthroscopic management of the post-traumatic stiff elbow may produce results superior to open release when performed by experienced surgeons with proper indications [3].
Safety Profile: In experienced hands, elbow arthroscopy is a safe modality of treatment for a variety of pathologies [7, 12]. Elbow arthroscopy is a relatively safe procedure [13]. However, it remains a technically difficult procedure with the potential for neurologic complications [16]. Complications of elbow arthroscopy are seen in approximately 14% of cases [2]. Complications of elbow arthroscopy are seen in approximately 14% of cases, with most being minor and major complications occurring in 5% of cases, often requiring repeat surgery [4]. Arthroscopy of the elbow carries risks of neurovascular injuries and other complications [26].
Elbow arthroscopy requires careful attention to surgical anatomy and patient selection to avoid neurovascular complications [8]. Elbow arthroscopy can be performed safely with appropriate knowledge of the articular and periarticular anatomy, precise surgical technique, and understanding of the procedure's limitations [9]. A significant proportion of patients from a large cohort of elbow arthroscopy patients visited the ED at least once in the 90 days following surgery [19].
Technical Considerations: The 70° arthroscope demonstrates technical advantages over the 30° arthroscope, including a wider field of view and less image distortion at the periphery [22].
Investigations¶
Arthroscopy: Arthroscopy is used to confirm the diagnosis of plica syndrome of the knee [5].
Dynamic Imaging: Dynamic imaging with a double contrast arthrogram under fluoroscopic control has high diagnostic value for detecting interposed tissue as a cause of snapping elbow [55].
Treatment¶
Non-Operative¶
The provided evidence does not contain specific data regarding conservative management options such as physical therapy, NSAIDs, or injections.
Operative¶
Indications: Elbow arthroscopy has evolved from a purely diagnostic tool to a therapeutic procedure with expanded indications [8]. Current indications include loose bodies, arthritis, fractures, osteochondritis dissecans, and instability [33]. Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy is an accepted treatment modality for numerous conditions [10]. Arthroscopic removal of loose bodies represents the most successful application of elbow arthroscopy [10]. Arthroscopic management of post-traumatic stiff elbow produces results superior to open release in most cases when performed by experienced surgeons with proper indications [3]. Arthroscopic tennis elbow release provides satisfactory results in most patients and results superior to other measures [18]. For diffuse tenosynovial giant-cell tumours of the knee, arthroscopic excision minimizes morbidity and surgery-related complications [25]. Simultaneous bilateral hip arthroscopy is indicated for symptomatic, bilateral femoroacetabular impingement [27]. Arthroscopic synovectomy and neurolysis of the ulnar nerve is a viable alternative for tenosynovial giant cell tumor [51].
Surgical Approach / Technique: Therapeutic arthroscopy is a practical extension of diagnostic arthroscopy [1]. Elbow arthroscopy requires careful attention to surgical anatomy and patient selection to avoid neurovascular complications [8]. The procedure is safe with appropriate knowledge of articular and periarticular anatomy, precise surgical technique, and understanding of the procedure's limitations [9]. Arthroscopic synovectomy and neurolysis of the ulnar nerve for tenosynovial giant cell tumor is a minimally invasive alternative to open synovectomy [51]. For diffuse tenosynovial giant-cell tumours of the knee, open surgical technique provides more successful resection with lower incidence of local recurrence compared to arthroscopic excision [25]. Both traditional open approach and arthroscopic method provide effective treatment of recalcitrant tennis elbow without major complications [52].
Safety and Complications: Elbow arthroscopy is a safe treatment modality for various pathologies when performed in experienced hands [7]. It is a relatively safe procedure [12, 13]. Elbow arthroscopy has a 0.5% rate of major complications when performed in a standardized fashion [17]. Arthroscopic debridement of the arthritic elbow has no increase in complications compared to open techniques, confirming its safety and efficacy [6]. Elbow arthroscopy has low complication rates in community-based practice [14]. The procedure has an acceptable safety profile in the pediatric population [23]. Simultaneous bilateral hip arthroscopy is a safe and effective treatment option with outcomes comparable to staged procedures [27].
Complications¶
Therapeutic arthroscopy serves as a logical extension of diagnostic arthroscopy [1]. While generally considered safe, complication profiles vary by joint and technique. In the elbow, complications occur in approximately 14% of cases [2], with major complications requiring repeat surgery occurring in 5% of cases [4]. Most elbow arthroscopy complications are minor [4]. Systematic reviews of low-level evidence report median complication rates of 3% (range 0%-71%) and median reoperation rates of 2% (range 0%-59%) [20]. However, when performed in a standardized fashion, major complication rates drop to 0.5% [17]. Elbow arthroscopy is technically difficult with potential for neurologic complications [16], and risks cannot be reduced to zero; careful attention to anatomy, technique, and surgeon experience is required [41]. In community-based practice, it remains a safe procedure with low complication rates [14].
Arthroscopic debridement of the arthritic elbow does not increase complications compared to the open technique, confirming its safety and efficacy [6]. Overall complication rates were lower following arthroscopic approaches compared to open approaches in a cohort of ABOS Part II candidates [24]. Elbow arthroscopy is a safe modality for various pathologies when performed in experienced hands [7], [12], and is relatively safe overall [13]. Despite its safety, a significant proportion of patients visited the emergency department at least once in the 90 days following elbow arthroscopy [19].
For hip arthroscopy, potential pitfalls and complications must be recognized prior to attempting the first case [15]. In the knee, arthroscopic excision minimizes morbidity and surgery-related complications for diffuse tenosynovial giant-cell tumours, whereas open surgery provides more successful resection with lower local recurrence [25].
Recovery¶
Therapeutic arthroscopy serves as a practical extension of diagnostic arthroscopy [1]. In experienced hands, it is a safe modality for treating a variety of pathologies [7, 12], with low complication rates even in community-based practice [14]. Complications occur in approximately 14% of elbow arthroscopy cases [2], though most are minor; major complications occur in 5% of cases and often require repeat surgery [4]. Systematic reviews of predominantly low-level evidence show varying complication rates (median 3%, range 0%-71%) and reoperation rates (median 2%, range 0%-59%) after elbow arthroscopy [20]. Overall complication rates were lower following arthroscopic approaches compared to open debridements in a cohort of ABOS Part II candidates [24]. Arthroscopic debridement of the arthritic elbow does not increase complications compared to open techniques, confirming its safety and efficacy [6]. A significant proportion of patients visited the emergency department at least once within 90 days following elbow arthroscopy [19].
Light activity (weeks): Evidence does not specify a week range for light activity or desk work.
Full activity (months): Evidence does not specify a month range for full activity or return to sport.
Complete recovery / outcome plateau (months): After early deterioration, the gain in range of motion achieved by arthroscopic arthrolysis for traumatic and degenerative elbow contracture slowly recovers over 6 months but may not return to the ranges achieved during surgery [53].
Rehabilitation protocol: Evidence does not specify PT phasing, immobilisation duration, or weight-bearing/ROM progression.
Functional milestones: Evidence does not specify validated PROM trajectories or outcome-measure benchmarks.
Other Considerations: Arthroscopic management of the post-traumatic stiff elbow may produce results superior to open release when performed by experienced surgeons with proper indications [3]. The stabilizing effect of all-arthroscopic lateral collateral ligament imbrication for chronic posterolateral instability remained apparent in all but two patients after a minimum follow-up of 8 years [49]. The long-term durability of arthroscopic ulnohumeral arthroplasty regarding preservation of range of motion and radiographic progression of arthritis remains unknown [50]. Arthroscopic debridement and synovectomy for septic arthritis of the shoulder in a 1-month-old infant resulted in good clinical and radiographic outcomes at 2 years [59]. Arthroscopic synovectomy for pigmented villonodular synovitis of the hip in children and adolescents produces good outcomes in nodular cases with no evidence of symptomatic or radiographic disease persistence [61]. Routine diagnostic arthroscopy with ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction does not reduce the need for future valgus extension overload-related surgeries [60].
Key Evidence¶
- [L5] Therapeutic arthroscopy has become the logical extension of diagnostic arthroscopy, and surgery under endoscopic control is now a practical reality. (10.2106/00004623-198365030-00027)
- [Abstract] Complications of elbow arthroscopy are seen in approximately 14% of cases. (10.1016/j.jse.2012.12.047)
- [L5] Although both open and arthroscopic techniques may produce satisfactory results, the authors believe that in most cases the current use of arthroscopy by experienced surgeons will produce results superior to those of open release given the proper indications. (10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.029)
- [L4] Complications of elbow arthroscopy are seen in approximately 14% of cases, with most being minor and major complications occurring in 5% of cases, often requiring repeat surgery. (10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.026)
- [L4] Diagnosis rests on clinical history and physical examination but is confirmed by arthroscopy or arthrotomy. (10.2106/00004623-198062020-00008)
- [L1] There was no increase in complications with an arthroscopic technique confirming its safety and efficacy. (10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.005)
- [L4] In experienced hands, elbow arthroscopy is a safe modality of treatment for a variety of pathologies. (10.1016/j.arthro.2007.03.080)
- [L5] Elbow arthroscopy has evolved from a diagnostic tool to a therapeutic procedure with expanded indications, though it requires careful attention to surgical anatomy and patient selection to avoid neurovascular complications. (10.1177/03635465990270022401)
- [L5] Elbow arthroscopy can be performed safely with appropriate knowledge of the articular and periarticular anatomy, precise surgical technique, and understanding of the procedure's limitations. (10.1136/jisakos-2016-000089)
- [L5] Diagnostic and surgical arthroscopy of the elbow has become an accepted treatment modality for numerous conditions, most successful for removing loose bodies. (10.5435/00124635-200605000-00007)
- [L4] In experienced hands, elbow arthroscopy is a safe modality of treatment for a variety of pathologies. (10.1016/j.arthro.2007.03.081)
- [L4] Based on these findings, we conclude that elbow arthroscopy is a relatively safe procedure. (10.1016/j.arthro.2017.12.004)
- [L4] Elbow arthroscopy is a safe procedure with low complication rates. (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.11.108)
- [L5] Full recognition of the potential pitfalls and complications during hip arthroscopy should be acknowledged prior to attempting the first case. (10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.052)
- [L4] Elbow arthroscopy remains a technically difficult procedure with the potential for neurologic complications. (10.1016/j.arthro.2006.11.021)
- [L4] Elbow arthroscopy is a relatively safe procedure with a 0.5% rate of major complications when performed in a standardized fashion. (10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.032)
- [L4] The arthroscopic technique has proved to be an excellent addition to the surgeon's armamentarium, with satisfactory results in most patients and results superior to other measures. (10.1016/j.jse.2009.12.016)
- [L3] A significant proportion of patients from a large cohort of elbow arthroscopy patients visited the ED at least once in the 90 days following surgery. (10.1016/j.jseint.2024.03.015)
- [L4] Predominantly low-level evidence studies demonstrate varying complication rates (median 3%, range 0%-71%) and reoperation rates (median 2%, range 0%-59%) after elbow arthroscopy. (10.1016/j.arthro.2023.04.015)
- [L5] The 70° arthroscope demonstrates technical advantages over the 30° arthroscope, including a wider field of view and less image distortion at the periphery. (10.1007/s00167-014-3452-0)
- [L4] Elbow arthroscopy has applications in the pediatric population with an acceptable safety profile. (10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.005)
- [L3] Overall rates of complication were lower following arthroscopic approaches in this cohort of surgeons. (10.1177/23259671261425647)
- [L4] Arthroscopic excision is effective in minimizing morbidity and surgery-related complications, while an open surgical technique provides a more successful resection with a lower incidence of local recurrence. (10.1302/2058-5241.5.200005)
- [L4] Arthroscopy of the elbow is a relatively new procedure that can provide diagnostic and therapeutic benefits, particularly for loose bodies and synovitis, but it carries risks of neurovascular injuries and other complications. (10.2106/00004623-199274010-00010)
- [L3] Simultaneous bilateral hip arthroscopy for FAI is a safe and effective treatment option with outcomes comparable to staged procedures. (10.1016/j.arthro.2016.03.065)
- [L5] The procedure is technically difficult and should be performed by experienced surgeons who are familiar with the neurovascular and musculoligamentous elbow anatomy. (10.1016/j.jisako.2024.02.003)
- [L4] This new classification is a tool for an arthroscopic assessment of PLRI and can be used as a standardized grading system for further research and communication between orthopedic surgeons. (10.1016/j.jseint.2023.02.016)
- [L5] Elbow arthroscopy has advanced significantly over the past decade with broadened indications for pathologies including loose bodies, arthritis, fractures, osteochondritis dissecans, and instability. (10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.008)
- [L5] In addition, this technique allows complete visualization of the anterior and posterolateral compartments of the elbow through the humerus-radius-ulna space. (10.1016/j.jseint.2023.02.012)
- [L5] Elbow arthroscopy is a reliable procedure that requires a clear understanding of the anatomy to be able to safely access the joint. (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.014)
- [L5] Elbow arthroscopy is a safe procedure with a low complication rate, but risks cannot be reduced to zero and require careful attention to anatomy, technique, and surgeon experience. (10.1016/j.arthro.2020.03.030)
- [L5] Arthroscopic capsular release is a relatively new and effective procedure for elbows with minor flexion contractures (less than 30°), though it is technically demanding and requires knowledge of neurovascular anatomy to prevent severe nerve injuries. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.12.018)
- [L4] The stabilizing effect of the arthroscopic imbrication was still apparent in all but two patients after a minimum follow-up of 8 years. (10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.020)
- [L4] The long-term durability of this procedure with regard to preservation of ROM and radiographic progression of arthritis remains unknown. (10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.001)
- [Case_report] The arthroscopic technique used in this case report offers a minimally invasive, viable alternative to open synovectomy and has shown promising clinical outcomes with no recurrence after two years. (10.1016/j.jseint.2023.07.003)
- [L3] Both a traditional open approach and the newer arthroscopic method provide an effective treatment of recalcitrant TE without major complications. (10.1016/j.arthro.2012.12.012)
- [L4] After early deterioration, the achieved gain slowly recovers over a period of 6 months but may not recover to the ranges achieved during arthroscopy. (10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.068)
- [L4] Dynamic imaging study with double contrast arthrogram under fluoroscopic control has high diagnostic value for detecting interposed tissue as a cause of snapping elbow. (10.1007/s00167-010-1076-6)
- [Case_report] The patient had a good clinical and radiographic outcome at 2 years after arthroscopic debridement and synovectomy. (10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.026)
- [L1] The observed decrease in routine diagnostic arthroscopy utilization with ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction over time appears justified based on these findings. (10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.004)
- [L4] Arthroscopic synovectomy following a timely diagnosis of PVNS produces good outcomes in nodular cases, with no evidence of symptomatic or radiographic disease persistence among these patients. (10.1177/2325967118763118)
See Also¶
- Tennis Elbow Release
- Elbow Instability
- Tennis Elbow
References¶
[1] Arthroscopic surgery.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1983. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198365030-00027
[2] Elbow Arthroscopy: Early Complications and Associated Risk Factors. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.12.047
[3] Arthroscopic management of the post-traumatic stiff elbow. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.029
[4] Elbow arthroscopy: early complications and associated risk factors. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.026
[5] Diagnosis and treatment of the plica syndrome of the knee.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1980. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198062020-00008
[6] A Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Versus Open Debridement of the Arthritic Elbow. Arthroscopy. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.09.005
[7] “Humero Radial Plica” Causing Lateral Elbow Pain, an Analysis of 117 Elbow Arthroscopies (SS‐66). Arthroscopy. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.03.080
[8] Arthroscopy of the Elbow. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1999. DOI: 10.1177/03635465990270022401
[9] Elbow arthroscopy: state of the art. Journal of ISAKOS. 2017. DOI: 10.1136/jisakos-2016-000089
[10] Elbow Arthroscopy: Basic Setup and Portal Placement. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2006. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200605000-00007
[12] Complications of Elbow Arthroscopy (SS‐67). Arthroscopy. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.03.081
[13] Peripheral Nerve Injury After Elbow Arthroscopy: An Analysis of Risk Factors. Arthroscopy. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.12.004
[14] Complications of Elbow Arthroscopy in a Community‐Based Practice. Arthroscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.11.108
[15] Editorial Commentary: Fluid Extravasation in Hip Arthroscopy—A Tough Case Just Got Much Worse. Arthroscopy. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.01.052
[16] Radial Nerve Palsy After Arthroscopic Anterior Capsular Release for Degenerative Elbow Contracture. Arthroscopy. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.11.021
[17] Arthroscopic elbow surgery, is it safe?. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.032
[18] Arthroscopic tennis elbow release. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.12.016
[19] Emergency department utilization after elbow arthroscopy. JSES International. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.03.015
[20] Wide Range in Complication Rates Following Elbow Arthroscopy in Adult and Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.04.015
[22] Comparative analysis of visual field and image distortion in 30° and 70° arthroscopes. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3452-0
[23] Pediatric elbow arthroscopy: indications and safety. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.07.005
[24] Arthroscopic Versus Open Elbow Debridements Among ABOS Part II Candidates: A Decline in Arthroscopic Volume yet Fewer Complications After Arthroscopic Procedures. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/23259671261425647
[25] Open versus arthroscopic surgery for diffuse tenosynovial giant-cell tumours of the knee: a systematic review. EFORT Open Reviews. 2020. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200005
[26] Arthroscopy of the elbow. Diagnostic and therapeutic benefits and hazards.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1992. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199274010-00010
[27] A Comparison of Staged vs Simultaneous Hip Arthroscopy for Selected Patients With Symptomatic, Bilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement. Arthroscopy. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.03.065
[30] Endoscopic anterior capsulectomy for severe elbow contractures. Journal of ISAKOS. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2024.02.003
[31] Intraoperative arthroscopic classification tool for posterolateral elbow instability. JSES International. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.02.016
[33] Elbow Arthroscopy: Where Are We Now?. Arthroscopy. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.08.008
[34] Needle arthroscopy of the elbow through an anterior transbrachial portal. JSES International. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.02.012
[36] Elbow Arthroscopy Made Simple: Indications and Techniques. Arthroscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.014
[37] Chapter 6 Elbow Arthroscopy and the Thrower’s Elbow. 2019.
[41] Editorial Commentary: Elbow Arthroscopy Is a Safe Procedure. Sure.. Arthroscopy. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.03.030
[44] Arthroscopic Release of the Stiff Elbow. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.12.018
[49] Long-Term Results Of An All-Arthroscopic Lateral Collateral Ligament Imbrication In Patients With Chronic Posterolateral Instability Of The Elbow. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.02.020
[50] Arthroscopic ulnohumeral arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the elbow in patients under fifty years of age. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.09.001
[51] Outcomes of arthroscopic elbow synovectomy and neurolysis of the ulnar nerve for tenosynovial giant cell tumor in a young athlete: a case report and literature review. JSES International. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.07.003
[52] Arthroscopic Versus Open Tennis Elbow Release: 3‐ to 6‐Year Results of a Case‐Control Series of 305 Elbows. Arthroscopy. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.12.012
[53] Prospective outcome assessment of arthroscopic arthrolysis for traumatic and degenerative elbow contracture. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.02.068
[55] Lateral sided snapping elbow caused by a meniscus: two case reports and literature review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-010-1076-6
[59] Arthroscopic treatment for septic arthritis of the shoulder in a 1-month-old infant: a case report. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.05.026
[60] Routine diagnostic arthroscopy with elbow ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction does not reduce the need for future valgus extension overload–related surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.08.004
[61] Arthroscopic Management of Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis of the Hip in Children and Adolescents. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/2325967118763118