Skip to content

Conservative Treatment

First-line management of chronic LBP and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, focusing on pain reduction, functional mobility, and preventing curve progression.

Overview

Conservative management serves as the primary intervention for a broad spectrum of orthopaedic conditions, often yielding outcomes comparable to operative care with reduced complication profiles. For Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocations, nonoperative treatment provides similar long-term outcomes to surgery with fewer complications [1]. In the context of degenerative full-thickness supraspinatus tears, conservative therapy achieves efficacy in 77% of patients [6]. Similarly, most patients with spondylodiscitis are successfully treated by conservative means [5], and nonoperative approaches are preferred for most symptomatic adults with isthmic spondylolisthesis, where success rates reach 60% [4].

Specific timelines and failure criteria guide the transition from conservative to surgical management across various pathologies. For acute calcific periarthritis of the hand, conservative measures provide pain relief and reduced calcification for up to six months, warranting a trial of at least six months before considering surgery [2]. Relative indications for surgical intervention include six months of persisting symptoms in cervical herniated discs [3], failure of conservative measures in thoracic herniated discs [3], and lack of improvement after six weeks in lumbar herniated discs [3]. Surgical treatment for spondylodiscitis is specifically indicated for doubtful diagnosis, progressive neurological deficits, progressive spinal deformity, failure to respond to treatment, or unresolved pain [5].

Decision-making also relies on specific failure modes and comparative efficacy data. While operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures reduces the risk of nonunion compared with conservative care, both modalities offer satisfactory results and comparable reintervention rates for indications other than nonunion [19]. In partial distal biceps tendon ruptures, prior conservative management does not detrimentally affect subsequent surgical outcomes, though surgery remains effective for treatment failures [7]. For lateral epicondylitis, combination treatment offers no advantage over physical therapy alone but is superior to brace-only therapy in the short term [12]. Steroid strategies prove more cost-effective than immediate surgery for trigger finger in diabetic patients when release is performed in the clinic after failed conservative treatment [11]. Finally, while operative treatment yields good results for distal patellar tendinosis in athletes when conservative care fails, further studies are necessary to increase the limited evidence on conservative treatments for early knee osteoarthritis [21, 45].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Kinematics and Biomechanics

Regular lumbosacral orthosis (LSO) use for three weeks in healthy subjects induces neuromuscular changes including altered trunk stiffness, damping, muscle activation patterns, and spine compression forces [54]. Both conventional and 3D-printed braces limit trunk range of motion compared to the unbraced condition but do not affect gait parameters during timed-up and go tests [82]. Wearable technologies and biofeedback modalities exist to modulate spine motor control, though standardized reporting and further research are needed to establish clinical efficacy [62]. Research efforts for knee osteoarthritis should focus on technologies that 'unload' the joint to address aberrant biomechanics, potentially reversing structural damage or delaying invasive reconstruction [67]. A biomechanical device applied to the feet of patients with knee osteoarthritis significantly reduces pain and improves function [71], yet no braces are currently available with biomechanical evidence that satisfies the requirements of applying correct anatomic joint forces that vary with the knee flexion angle [74].

Spinal Orthosis and Curve Dynamics

In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, Cobb angle, curve type, flexibility, and correction rate are strong and consistent predictors of curve progression during conservative treatment [65]. Both 3D patient-specific parameters (lordosis, thoracic rotation, rib cage shape, and sagittal profile) and brace design (allowing larger in-brace lordosis and better in-brace Cobb correction) are important predictors of brace effectiveness [79]. Spinal flexibility is strongly correlated with the in-brace Cobb angle or correction rate, with moderate evidence supporting its ability to predict bracing outcomes [80]. Thoracic curves in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are at greater risk for brace failure than lumbar curves despite similar initial curve magnitudes and average daily brace wear [84]. Corrective forces applied in zone 3 by spinal orthoses do not significantly reduce thoracic kyphosis nor exacerbate the deviation of the scoliotic spine from the sagittal plane [64]. The Lyon brace is highly effective in correcting thoracic curves in adolescent females with thoracic idiopathic scoliosis through biomechanical action on vertebral modeling, particularly when SOSORT guidelines are adopted alongside SRS criteria [68].

Neurophysiology and Pain Mechanisms

Spinal manipulation is associated with two mechanistic pathways: a decrease in mechanical pain sensitivity independent of clinical outcome (neurophysiological) and a decrease reflecting the clinical outcome [83]. Improved sagittal cervical posture alignment outcomes may contribute to the management of cervical myofascial pain syndrome [70]. Orthopaedic surgeons must be aware of the pathophysiology and risks associated with prone positioning in spine surgery to initiate preventive measures and predictable treatment options [63]. Back pain researchers should develop hypotheses and models regarding how risks from different stages of life interact to influence the onset, persistence, and prognosis of back pain throughout the life course [77]. Most individuals with persistent or recurrent low back pain adhere to a traditional biomedical perspective of anatomical or biomechanical causes despite efforts to shift beliefs toward biopsychosocial factors [78].

Soft Tissue and Joint Mechanics

Splinting for trigger finger is considered risk-free, easy to fabricate and perform, and possesses a solid biomechanical rationale [73].

Classification

Rockwood: Classifies acromioclavicular joint dislocations; conservative treatment is a viable alternative to operative treatment for Rockwood type III dislocation, offering fewer complications and similar long-term outcomes [1].

Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: Nonoperative treatment is the preferred approach for most symptomatic adult patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis and is successful in as many as 60% of patients [4].

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Conservative treatment approaches are evaluated to determine efficacy, with findings regarding curve morphology and location potentially improving future brace design and patient selection [8, 16].

De Quervain's Disease: Classification based on pre-treatment symptom severity assists in selecting the most efficacious treatment; splintage and NSAIDs are effective for minimal symptoms, while steroid injection is the initial treatment of choice for mild to severe disease [15].

Boutonniere Deformity: Conservative management can achieve one to two grades of range of motion improvement, though deformity can persist even after dedicated conservative management [24].

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: A classification system reflects a consensus reached by the European Rehabilitation Panel to help clinicians identify the cause(s) of pain and select the most appropriate non-operative treatment [33].

Low Back Pain: Sub-classification based on specific movement control exercises is superior to general exercise in sub-acute low back pain when both are combined with manual therapy [47]; a study protocol aims to classify patients with chronic low back pain into different clinical subgroups to identify specific target groups who might benefit from specific surgical or conservative interventions [48].

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: International and multi-professional agreement was achieved for a proposed treatment algorithm developed through expert consensus [56].

Other Considerations: Lateral Epicondylitis: Combination treatment has no additional advantage compared to physical therapy alone but is superior to brace only for the short term [12]. Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Physiotherapy diagnosis and management from six countries broadly align with contemporary expert recommendations [14]. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: CTS that does not respond to an initial course of conservative treatment may not improve with additional treatments [9]. Subacromial Impingement Syndrome: There is no evidence from available randomized controlled trials for differences in outcome in pain and shoulder function between conservatively and surgically treated patients [58]. Adolescent Overuse Injuries: Proper evaluation and treatment of overuse injuries and accurate counseling of training types, volume, and progression reduced low back pain problems to 29% of adolescent subjects one year later despite maintained high activity levels [55].

Clinical Presentation

Conservative management serves as the primary approach for a broad spectrum of musculoskeletal pathologies, often yielding outcomes comparable to operative intervention. For Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocations, conservative treatment provides similar long-term outcomes to surgery with fewer complications [1]. In the context of degenerative full-thickness supraspinatus tears, nonoperative treatment is effective in 77% of patients [6]. Similarly, the majority of patients with low back pain experience symptom resolution without surgical intervention [31], and nonoperative treatment for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis succeeds in up to 60% of cases [4]. Most patients with spondylodiscitis are also successfully managed conservatively [5].

Initial Management Modalities: For acute calcific periarthritis of the hand, conservative treatment may be trialed for at least 6 months, during which patients experience pain relief and reduced calcification [2]. In De Quervain's disease, splintage and NSAIDs are effective for minimal symptoms, while steroid injection remains the initial treatment of choice for mild to severe presentations [15]. For symptomatic lumbar degenerative disk disease, physical therapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs constitute the cornerstones of nonsurgical care [31]. Pharmacological treatment for early osteoarthritis should be integrated with other conservative measures, with patients and physicians maintaining realistic outcome goals [34]. In diabetic patients with trigger finger, steroid strategies are more cost-effective than immediate surgery if release after failed conservative treatment is performed in the clinic [11].

Diagnostic Utility and Imaging: MRI before a trial of conservative management provides negative value in patients with atraumatic shoulder pain, minimal to no strength deficits, and suspected cuff tendinopathy other than full-thickness tears [17]. For carpal tunnel syndrome, moderate and mild cases are initially treated conservatively, whereas severe cases warrant strong surgical recommendation [32]. However, carpal tunnel syndrome unresponsive to an initial course of conservative treatment may not improve with additional interventions [9]. Classification based on pre-treatment symptom severity assists in selecting the most efficacious treatment for De Quervain's disease [15], and physiotherapy diagnosis and management of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) from six countries broadly align with contemporary expert recommendations [14].

Indications for Surgical Escalation: Specific timelines and failure patterns dictate the transition to surgery. Six months of persisting symptoms is a relative indication for surgery in cervical herniated discs [3], while failure of conservative measures is a relative indication for thoracic herniated discs [3]. For lumbar herniated discs, failure to improve after six weeks is a relative indication for surgery [3]. In spondylodiscitis, surgical treatment is indicated for doubtful diagnosis, progressive neurological deficits, progressive spinal deformity, failure to respond to treatment, and unresolved pain [5]. For partial distal biceps tendon ruptures, surgery remains an effective option for treatment failures, with prior conservative management having no detrimental effects on subsequent surgical outcomes [7]. Early detection combined with early brace treatment is critical for a good final result in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis [35], while early diagnosis of cauda equina syndrome is often challenging due to subtle initial signs and symptoms [36].

Investigations

MRI: MRI is indicated for evaluating osteochondritis dissecans lesions [57], though all other AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline recommendations for this condition are either inconclusive or require consensus grading [57]. In patients with atraumatic shoulder pain, minimal to no strength deficits, and suspected cuff tendinopathy (excluding full-thickness tears), MRI prior to a trial of conservative management provides negative value at both individual and population levels [17]. For spontaneous osteonecrosis of the medial compartment of the knee, the MRI appearance of the necrotic lesion does not alter with either conservative or operative treatment [60]. MRI findings also assist in identifying stable, nondisplaced ligament Lisfranc injuries suitable for nonoperative management [59].

Plain radiography: Clinical and radiological results achieved with the Lucerne cast for extra-articular fractures of the proximal phalanges are comparable to established treatments [46]. Radiographic severity in knee osteoarthritis may be similar between patients receiving conservative treatment and those undergoing total knee replacement, despite the latter group exhibiting significantly worse baseline clinical outcomes, particularly in WOMAC scores [50].

Laboratory: Radiological and laboratory evaluation methods may allow for objective monitoring of symptomatic bone marrow lesions of the knee, though these methods appear to capture different dimensions than patient-reported pain [49].

Other Considerations: Conservative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation provides fewer complications and similar long-term outcomes compared to operative treatment [1], although surgical treatment using a hook plate achieved better results regarding Constant score and radiologic outcomes [52]. Conservative management for acute calcific periarthritis of the hand provides pain relief and reduced calcification for up to 6 months, and should be attempted for at least 6 months before considering surgery [2]. For cervical herniated discs, six months of persisting symptoms is a relative indication for surgery [3]; failure of conservative measures is a relative indication for thoracic herniated discs [3]; and failure to improve after six weeks is a relative indication for lumbar herniated discs [3]. Nonoperative treatment is the preferred approach for most symptomatic adults with isthmic spondylolisthesis and is successful in as many as 60% of patients [4]. Most patients with spondylodiscitis are successfully treated by conservative means, with surgical indications reserved for doubtful diagnosis, progressive neurological deficits, progressive spinal deformity, failure to respond to treatment, or unresolved pain [5]. Carpal tunnel syndrome that does not respond to an initial course of conservative treatment may not improve with additional treatments [9]. Active nonoperative treatment with casting and bracing for acutely injured posterior cruciate ligament yielded satisfactory functional and MRI results in the majority of patients at intermediate-term follow-up [20]. Nonoperative treatment for Boutonniere deformity can achieve one to two grades of range of motion improvement, though deformity can persist even after dedicated conservative management [24]. Among patients with MRI-verified meniscal lesions, 58% could be treated conservatively with good results [43]. Stable, nondisplaced ligament Lisfranc injuries without significant MRI findings can be treated nonoperatively, allowing most athletes to safely return to sport within 6–10 weeks with minimal complications [59]. One-third of patients with advanced radiographic thumb carpometacarpal arthritis underwent surgery within 5 years of initial corticosteroid injection [61].

Treatment

Non-Operative

Conservative management serves as a viable alternative to operative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation, offering fewer complications with similar long-term outcomes [1]. For acute calcific periarthritis of the hand, conservative treatment provides pain relief and reduced calcification for up to 6 months, warranting a trial of at least 6 months before considering surgical options [2]. In cervical herniated discs, persisting symptoms for six months constitute a relative indication for surgery, whereas failure of conservative measures is the relative indication for thoracic herniated discs [3]. For lumbar herniated discs, failure to improve after six weeks is a relative indication for surgery [3]. Nonoperative treatment is the preferred approach for most symptomatic adults with isthmic spondylolisthesis and succeeds in as many as 60% of patients [4]. Conservative treatment was effective in 77% of patients with a degenerative full-thickness supraspinatus tear [6]. A comprehensive conservative program positively and lastingly affects pain and disability scores in non-radicular peripheral neuropathic pain [10]. For trigger finger in diabetic patients, steroid strategies are more cost-effective if release after failed conservative treatment is performed in the clinic [11]. Combination treatment for lateral epicondylitis is superior to brace only for the short term, though it offers no additional advantage compared to physical therapy [12]. Hip arthroscopy is statistically superior to conservative treatment in both long-term and short-term effects for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome [13]. If nonoperative modalities fail for trigger digits, open release and percutaneous release are both safe and relatively simple options [18]. Active nonoperative treatment with casting and bracing yielded satisfactory functional and MRI results in the majority of patients with acutely injured posterior cruciate ligament at intermediate-term follow-up [20]. Conservative management is equally effective to a new suture anchor technique for acute mallet finger deformity, with no statistically different therapeutic effectiveness [29]. Ultrasound may be used as a conservative non-pharmaceutical and non-invasive treatment option for knee osteoarthritis [37]. Compared with normal saline, none of the conservative therapies show statistically significant improvements in pain relief or functional recovery across all follow-up periods for partial-thickness rotator cuff tears [38]. Nonoperative treatment using serial casting and splints should be tried before attempting open surgical release for posttraumatic proximal interphalangeal joint contracture [39]. Non-operative management was more effective in level I patients with gluteal muscle contracture than in level II and III patients [40]. Non-surgical treatment for thumb base osteoarthritis provides clinically worthwhile improvements in pain and function, with a recommended stepwise approach starting with self-management, followed by splints and injections if symptoms persist [42]. Nonoperative treatment provided symptomatic relief in most patients with degenerative posterior root tear of the medial meniscus [41]. The most compelling indication for the use of spinal orthoses remains the management of traumatic spine injury [44]. Further studies are necessary to increase the limited medical evidence on conservative treatments for early knee osteoarthritis [21].

Operative

Indications: Surgery is indicated for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation when conservative treatment fails, though it remains a viable alternative [1]. Relative indications for surgery include six months of persisting symptoms in cervical herniated discs [3], failure of conservative measures in thoracic herniated discs [3], and failure to improve after six weeks in lumbar herniated discs [3]. Surgery is considered for acute calcific periarthritis of the hand if conservative treatment fails after 6 months [2]. Hip arthroscopy is indicated for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome given its statistical superiority over conservative treatment [13]. Open surgical release for posttraumatic proximal interphalangeal joint contracture should be done in selected patients after nonoperative modalities fail [39]. Surgery is an option for trigger digits if nonoperative modalities fail [18]. Operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures is indicated to reduce the risk of nonunion compared with conservative treatment [19].

Surgical Approach / Technique: For partial distal biceps tendon ruptures, surgery remains an effective option for treatment failures with no detrimental effects from prior conservative management [7]. Open release and percutaneous release are both safe and relatively simple treatment options for trigger digits if nonoperative modalities fail [18]. A new suture anchor technique is an operative option for acute mallet finger deformity, showing therapeutic effectiveness not statistically different from conservative treatment [29]. Operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures reduces the risk of nonunion compared with conservative treatment [19].

Implant Selection: Evidence does not specify implant selection criteria for the conditions listed in this evidence base.

Alignment / Balancing Strategy: Evidence does not specify alignment or balancing strategies for the conditions listed in this evidence base.

Pain Management: Evidence does not specify pain management regimens for the conditions listed in this evidence base.

Adjuncts: Evidence does not specify adjuncts such as tourniquet, tranexamic acid, drains, navigation, or robotics for the conditions listed in this evidence base.

Setting of Care: Evidence does not specify outpatient versus inpatient settings for the conditions listed in this evidence base.

Revision: Evidence does not cover revision-procedure principles for the conditions listed in this evidence base.

Other Considerations: Operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures has comparable reintervention rates to conservative treatment for indications other than nonunion [19]. Satisfactory results can be achieved with both conservative and operative management for humeral shaft fractures [19]. Non-operative management was more effective in level I patients with gluteal muscle contracture than in level II and III patients [40].

Complications

Other Considerations: Conservative management of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocations is associated with fewer complications compared to operative treatment [1]. In contrast, conservative treatment of distal radius fractures is associated with an increase in upper limb disability after 1 year of follow-up [23]. For posterior shoulder instability, 46% of patients initially managed nonoperatively converted to surgery between 1 and 10 years after initial diagnosis [25]. Regarding Perthes' disease, 19% of nonoperatively treated hips underwent total hip arthroplasty after a mean follow-up of 48 years [27]. In cases of rotator cuff tears treated conservatively, about 90% of patients had no or only slight pain at 13 years after diagnosis, and about 70% had no disturbance in activities of daily life at 13 years after diagnosis [28]. The original study on long-term outcomes of conservatively treated rotator cuff tears was suggested to have divided participants into asymptomatic and symptomatic groups to better evaluate operative rates in the symptomatic group [66]. Prior conservative management does not have detrimental effects on outcomes for patients requiring surgery due to treatment failure of partial distal biceps tendon ruptures [7].

Other Considerations: Conservative treatment for acute calcific periarthritis of the hand can result in pain relief and reduced calcification for up to 6 months [2]. For lumbar spinal-canal stenosis, conservative management with land-based exercise is recommended prior to surgical intervention due to the condition's slowly progressive nature and potential surgical complications [69]. Manipulation for intervertebral lumbar-disc syndrome has shown sufficiently gratifying results based on twenty years' experience in over 600 patients [76]. Improvement in medial epicondylitis primarily reflects the natural history of the disorder and the therapeutic effects of physical therapy and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications rather than steroid injections alone [72]. Enrolment of low back pain patients in clinical studies is likely to provoke responses that reflect nonspecific effects of seeking and receiving care, independent of study design [75].

Other Considerations: Surgical intervention for herniated discs is indicated for thoracic levels following failure of conservative measures [3]. Surgical intervention for herniated discs is indicated for lumbar levels when symptoms fail to improve after six weeks [3]. Surgical treatment for spondylodiscitis is indicated for patients with progressive neurological deficits, progressive spinal deformity, unresolved pain, or those who fail to respond to conservative treatment [5]. Surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome appears more effective than local corticosteroid injections in long-term follow-up [22]. Hip arthroscopy is statistically superior to conservative treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome in both long-term and short-term effects [13]. It is currently impossible to state that bracing effectively alters the natural history of scoliosis in immature patients who are at high risk for progression [26].

Recovery

Light activity (weeks): Return to desk work and driving is not explicitly quantified in the provided evidence; however, nonoperative management of ulnar collateral ligament injuries in throwing athletes allows a return to competition at an average of 24.5 weeks [87]. For Rockwood Type V acromioclavicular dislocations, the average time to return to duty was not improved with acute versus delayed surgical intervention, though specific timelines for conservative care are not detailed [81].

Full activity (months): Conservative treatment for acute calcific periarthritis of the hand resulted in pain relief and reduced calcification for up to 6 months [2]. Six months of persisting symptoms is a relative indication for surgery in cervical herniated discs, while failure to improve after six weeks is a relative indication for surgery in lumbar herniated discs [3]. A follow-up timeline with time points 4 and 10.5 months after onset is suggested when deciding whether to perform surgery for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation [86]. Conservative treatment of distal radius fractures produced an increase in upper limb disability after 1 year of follow-up [23].

Complete recovery / outcome plateau (months): In cases of rotator cuff tears treated conservatively, about 90% of patients had no or only slight pain at 13 years after diagnosis, and about 70% had no disturbance in activities of daily life at 13 years [28]. Conservative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation provides similar long-term outcomes to operative treatment with fewer complications [1]. After a mean follow-up of 48 years, 19% of nonoperatively treated hips in Perthes' disease had undergone total hip arthroplasty [27]. Long-term cumulative treatment outcomes for ataluren were presented over a median period of 6.3 years [85].

Rehabilitation protocol: Conservative treatment for acute calcific periarthritis of the hand could be tried for at least 6 months before considering surgical options [2]. Failure of conservative measures is a relative indication for surgery in thoracic herniated discs [3]. Conservative treatment was effective in 77% of patients with degenerative full-thickness supraspinatus tears [6]. A comprehensive conservative treatment program has a positive and lasting effect on pain and disability scores in patients with non-radicular peripheral neuropathic pain [10]. Hip arthroscopy is statistically superior to conservative treatment in both long-term and short-term effects for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome [13]. In long-term follow-up, surgery is more effective than local corticosteroid injections for primary carpal tunnel syndrome [22]. It is currently impossible to state that bracing effectively alters the natural history of scoliosis in immature patients who are at high risk for progression [26].

Functional milestones: 46% of patients initially managed nonoperatively for posterior shoulder instability converted to surgery between 1 and 10 years after initial diagnosis [25]. Nonoperative treatment allowed 42% of throwing athletes with ulnar collateral ligament injuries to return to their previous level of competition [87]. Conservative treatment was successful in a majority of patients with Rockwood Type V acromioclavicular dislocations [81]. Patients with severe intermittent claudication should be carefully followed up because they are significant candidates for deterioration despite the success of conservative treatment for lumbar spinal canal stenosis [89].

Other Considerations: High-quality trials and long-term follow-up are recommended to evaluate disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes for transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in chronic low back pain [51]. The authors hypothesize that tailored neck-shoulder pain treatment will have better short, intermediate, and long-term effects on pain and function than non-tailored treatment or treatment-as-usual [53]. Early diagnosis and aggressive treatment are required to obtain a satisfactory outcome for life- and limb-threatening infections following the use of an external fixator [88].

Key Evidence

  • [L1] Conservative treatment provides a viable alternative with fewer complications and similar long-term outcomes. (10.1186/s12891-024-08100-x)
  • [L4] Those who continued conservative treatment showed pain relief and reduced calcification for up to 6 months, suggesting conservative treatment could be tried for at least 6 months before considering surgical options. (10.1186/s13018-018-0997-5)
  • [L5] Relative indications vary by level: six months of persisting symptoms for cervical, failure of conservative measures for thoracic, and failure to improve after six weeks for lumbar. (10.1302/2058-5241.6.210020)
  • [L4] Nonoperative treatment is the preferred approach in most symptomatic patients and is successful in as many as 60%. (10.5435/00124635-199607000-00004)
  • [L5] Most patients with spondylodiscitis are successfully treated by conservative means; however, surgical treatment is indicated for doubtful diagnosis, progressive neurological deficits, progressive spinal deformity, failure to respond to treatment, and unresolved pain. (10.1302/2058-5241.2.160062)
  • [L2] Conservative treatment was effective in 77% of patients with a degenerative supraspinatus tear. (10.1302/0301-620x.107b12.bjj-2025-0742.r2)
  • [L3] Surgery remains an effective option for treatment failures with no detrimental effects from prior conservative management. (10.1016/j.jse.2025.04.017)
  • [L1] This trial will evaluate which of the tested conservative treatment approaches is the most effective for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. (10.1186/1471-2474-14-261)
  • [L2] CTS that does not respond to an initial course of conservative treatment may not improve with additional treatments. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.04.034)
  • [L3] A comprehensive, conservative treatment program has a positive and lasting effect on pain and disability scores in patients with non-radicular PNP. (10.1016/j.jht.2014.02.003)
  • [Letter] Steroid strategies are more cost effective if release after failed conservative treatment is performed in the clinic. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.037)
  • [L1] Combination treatment has no additional advantage compared to physical therapy but is superior to brace only for the short term. (10.1177/0095399703258714)
  • [L1] In our meta-analysis, hip arthroscopy is statistically superior to conservative treatment in both long-term and short-term effects. (10.1186/s13018-022-03187-1)
  • [L4] Findings of physiotherapy diagnosis and management of FAIS from six countries broadly align with contemporary expert recommendations. (10.1186/s12891-025-08708-7)
  • [L4] Classification of patients based on pre-treatment symptom severity assists in selecting the most efficacious treatment; splintage and NSAIDs are effective for minimal symptoms, while steroid injection is the initial treatment of choice for mild to severe disease. (10.1054/jhsb.2001.0568)
  • [L3] These findings may improve future brace design and patient selection for conservative treatment. (10.1302/0301-620x.103b2.bjj-2020-1113.r2)
  • [L4] The use of MRI before a trial of conservative management in patients with atraumatic shoulder pain, minimal to no strength deficits on physical examination, and suspected cuff tendinopathy other than full-thickness tears provides negative value in the management of these patients, at both the individual and population level. (10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.003)
  • [L5] If nonoperative modalities fail, open release and percutaneous release are both safe and relatively simple treatment options. (10.5435/00124635-200107000-00004)
  • [L1] Satisfactory results can be achieved with both conservative and operative management; however, operative treatment reduces the risk of nonunion compared with conservative treatment, with comparable reintervention rates (for indications other than nonunion). (10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.072)
  • [L4] Active nonoperative treatment with casting and bracing yielded satisfactory functional and MRI results in the majority of patients at intermediate-term follow-up. (10.1016/j.arthro.2011.06.030)
  • [L4] Further studies are necessary to increase the limited medical evidence on conservative treatments, optimizing results, application modalities, indications, and focusing on early OA. (10.1007/s00167-011-1713-8)
  • [L1] In long-term follow-up, surgery seems more effective than local corticosteroid injections in primary CTS. (10.1177/1558944720944263)
  • [L3] Conservative treatment of distal radius fractures produced an increase in upper limb disability after 1 year of follow-up. (10.1177/1558944717708025)
  • [L3] One to two grades of ROM improvement can be achieved, although deformity can persist even after dedicated conservative management. (10.1016/j.jht.2025.02.013)
  • [L3] Long-term follow-up demonstrates that 46% of patients initially managed nonoperatively converted to surgery between 1 and 10 years after initial diagnosis. (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.056)
  • [L4] It is currently impossible to state that bracing effectively alters the natural history of scoliosis in immature patients who are at high risk for progression. (10.2106/00004623-199604000-00009)
  • [L3] After a mean follow-up of 48 years, 19% of nonoperatively treated hips had undergone total hip arthroplasty. (10.1302/0301-620x.107b6.bjj-2024-1310.r1)
  • [L2] In cases of rotator cuff tears treated conservatively, at 13 years after diagnosis, about 90% of patients had no or only slight pain and about 70% had no disturbance in activities of daily life. (10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.012)
  • [L1] The therapeutic effectiveness of the suture anchor technique was not statistically different from conservative treatment. (10.1016/j.jht.2017.07.006)
  • [L2] The majority of patients suffering from cubital tunnel syndrome with mild or moderate symptoms benefit from conservative treatment. (10.1177/1753193408098480)
  • [L5] In most patients with low back pain, symptoms resolve without surgical intervention; physical therapy and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the cornerstones of nonsurgical treatment. (10.5435/00124635-200902000-00006)
  • [L3] Surgery is strongly recommended for severe CTS, while moderate and mild cases are initially treated conservatively. (10.1177/1753193408087119)
  • [L5] The authors introduce a classification system reflecting a consensus reached by the European Rehabilitation Panel to help clinicians identify the cause(s) of patellofemoral pain and select the most appropriate non-operative treatment. (10.1007/s00167-004-0577-6)
  • [L4] Patients and physicians should have realistic outcome goals in pharmacological treatment, which should be considered together with other conservative measures. (10.1007/s00167-016-4089-y)
  • [L3] Early detection in combination with early brace treatment is as important for a good final result in the population as are good treatment methods. (10.2106/00004623-198163030-00002)
  • [L5] Early diagnosis is often challenging because the initial signs and symptoms frequently are subtle. (10.5435/00124635-200808000-00006)
  • [L1] The clinical findings suggest that ultrasound may be used as a conservative non-pharmaceutical and non-invasive treatment option for patients with knee osteoarthritis. (10.1186/s13018-018-0965-0)
  • [L1] Compared with normal saline, none of the conservative therapies show statistically significant improvements in pain relief or functional recovery across all follow-up periods. (10.1002/arj.70022)
  • [L5] Nonoperative treatment using serial casting and splints should be tried before attempting open surgical release, which should be done in selected patients. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.014)
  • [L4] Non-operative management was more effective in level I patients than in level II and III patients. (10.1186/1471-2474-10-34)
  • [L4] This study demonstrated that non-operative treatment provided symptomatic relief in most patients with the degenerative posterior root tear of the medial meniscus. (10.1007/s00167-009-0891-0)
  • [L1] Non-surgical treatment provides clinically worthwhile improvements in pain and function, with a stepwise approach recommended starting with self-management, followed by splints and injections if symptoms persist. (10.1177/17531934241313206)
  • [L2] Among a consecutive group of patients with MRI-verified meniscal lesions, 58% could be treated conservatively with good results. (10.1007/s00167-013-2494-z)
  • [L5] The most compelling indication for their use remains the management of traumatic spine injury. (10.5435/00124635-201011000-00003)
  • [L4] Operative treatment seems to give good results in most cases of distal patellar tendinosis in athletes when conservative treatment has failed. (10.1007/s00167-006-0135-5)
  • [L2] The clinical and radiological results achieved with the Lucerne cast are comparable to those of established treatment. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.02.017)
  • [L1] Sub-classification based specific movement control exercises are superior to general exercise in sub-acute low back pain when both are combined with manual therapy. (10.1186/s12891-016-0986-y)
  • [L3] It will classify patients with CLBP into different clinical subgroups and help to identify specific target groups who might benefit from specific surgical or conservative interventions. (10.1186/1471-2474-9-81)
  • [L3] Radiological and laboratory evaluation methods may allow for objective treatment monitoring but appear to capture different dimensions than patient-reported pain. (10.1007/s00167-019-05598-w)
  • [L3] Patients undergoing TKR exhibited significantly worse baseline clinical outcomes, particularly in WOMAC scores, despite having similar radiographic severity to those receiving conservative treatment, suggesting that functional and symptomatic measures may be more valuable than radiographic findings in determining surgical intervention. (10.1186/s13018-025-05552-2)
  • [L1] Therefore, high-quality trials and long-term follow-up are recommended to evaluate disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes. (10.1186/s12891-024-07569-w)
  • [L3] Surgical treatment by use of a hook plate achieved better results than conservative therapy, particularly regarding Constant score and radiologic outcomes. (10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.017)
  • [L2] The authors hypothesize that tailored treatment will have better short, intermediate, and long-term effects on pain and function than non-tailored treatment or treatment-as-usual. (10.1186/1471-2474-13-75)
  • [L4] The study documented neuromuscular changes in healthy subjects during a 3-week period while they regularly wore a LSO, specifically measuring trunk stiffness, damping, muscle activation patterns, and spine compression forces. (10.1186/1471-2474-11-154)
  • [L3] A proper evaluation and treatment of overuse injuries and accurate counseling of training types, volume, and progression reduced the low back pain problems to 29% of subjects 1 year later in spite of a maintained high activity level. (10.1007/s00167-003-0389-0)
  • [L4] International and multi-professional agreement was achieved for a proposed LSS treatment algorithm developed through expert consensus. (10.1186/s12891-022-05485-5)
  • [L5] The guideline suggests using MRI to evaluate the lesion, but all other recommendations are either inconclusive or required consensus grading. (10.5435/00124635-201105000-00008)
  • [L1] According to the best-evidence synthesis, there is no evidence from the available RCTs for differences in outcome in pain and shoulder function between conservatively and surgically treated patients with SIS. (10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.010)
  • [L5] Stable, nondisplaced ligament injuries without significant MRI findings can be treated nonoperatively, with most athletes safely returning to sport within 6–10 weeks and minimal complications. (10.1002/ksa.70244)
  • [L3] The MRI appearance of the necrotic lesion does not alter with either treatment mode. (10.1007/s001670050191)
  • [L4] Of patients who presented with advanced radiographic arthritis, one-third underwent surgery within 5 years of initial injection. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.03.025)
  • [L1] The review identifies a range of wearable technologies and biofeedback modalities used to modulate spine motor control, highlighting the need for standardized reporting and further research to establish clinical efficacy. (10.1186/s12891-024-07867-3)
  • [L5] Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of pathophysiology and related risks associated with spine surgery in the prone position, and initiate preventive measures and predictable treatment options. (10.5435/00124635-200703000-00005)
  • [L4] Notably, only forces in zone 3 neither significantly reduced thoracic kyphosis nor exacerbated the deviation of the scoliotic spine from the sagittal plane. (10.1186/s12891-024-08014-8)
  • [L2] Strong and consistent evidence supports Cobb angle, curve type, flexibility, and correction rate as predictors of curve progression. (10.1302/0301-620x.104b4.bjj-2021-1677.r1)
  • [Letter] The authors suggest that the original study should have divided participants into asymptomatic and symptomatic groups to better evaluate the use of the word 'treatment' and to clarify the operative rate in the symptomatic group. (10.1016/j.jse.2012.10.027)
  • [L5] The authors propose that research and development efforts should focus on addressing aberrant biomechanics through technologies that 'unload' the joint, as this may reverse structural damage, delay the need for invasive joint reconstruction, or obviate the need entirely. (10.1007/s00167-011-1403-6)
  • [L4] The Lyon brace, through its biomechanical action on vertebral modeling, is highly effective in correcting thoracic curves, particularly when the SOSORT guidelines were adopted in addition to the SRS criteria. (10.1186/s12891-015-0782-0)
  • [L1] However, given the condition's slowly progressive nature and the potential for known surgical complications, it is recommended that a trial of conservative management with land based exercise be considered prior to consideration of surgical intervention. (10.1186/1471-2474-13-30)
  • [L2] The authors speculate that improved sagittal cervical posture alignment outcomes contributed to these findings. (10.1186/s12891-018-2317-y)
  • [L2] The biomechanical device and treatment methodology is effective in significantly reducing pain and improving function in knee OA patients. (10.1186/1471-2474-11-179)
  • [L1] The improvement observed primarily reflects the natural history of the disorder and the therapeutic effects of physical therapy and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications. (10.2106/00004623-199711000-00006)
  • [L4] However, the intervention is risk-free, easy to fabricate and perform, and has a solid biomechanical rationale. (10.1016/j.jht.2008.07.002)
  • [L4] No braces are currently available with biomechanical evidence that satisfies the requirements of applying correct anatomic joint forces that vary with the knee flexion angle. (10.1007/s00167-012-2048-9)
  • [L1] In addition to a shared 'natural history', enrolment of LBP patients in clinical studies is likely to provoke responses that reflect the nonspecific effects of seeking and receiving care, independent of the study design. (10.1186/1471-2474-15-68)
  • [L4] Based on twenty years' experience in over 600 patients, manipulation for intervertebral lumbar-disc syndrome has shown sufficiently gratifying results to continue with the procedure. (10.2106/00004623-195537050-00003)
  • [L5] Back pain researchers could usefully develop hypotheses and models of how risks from different stages of life might interact and influence the onset, persistence and prognosis of back pain throughout the life course. (10.1186/1471-2474-11-23)
  • [L4] Despite continuing attempts to shift pain beliefs to more complex biopsychosocial factors, most people with LBP adhere to the traditional biomedical perspective of anatomical/biomechanical causes. (10.1186/s12891-017-1831-7)
  • [L3] Both 3D patient specific parameters (lordosis, thoracic rotation, shape of the rib cage, and sagittal profile) and brace design (which allows larger in brace lordosis, better in brace Cobb correction) are important predictors of the brace effectiveness in AIS. (10.1186/s12891-019-2754-2)
  • [L1] Spinal flexibility was strongly correlated with the in-brace Cobb angle or correction rate, and moderate evidence supported that spinal flexibility could predict bracing outcomes. (10.1186/s13018-023-04430-z)
  • [L4] Conservative treatment was successful in a majority of patients with Type V AC dislocations, and the average time to return to duty was not improved with acute versus delayed surgical intervention. (10.1177/2325967115s00017)
  • [L4] Both brace types limited trunk range of motion compared to the unbraced condition but did not affect gait parameters during TUG tests. (10.1186/s12891-025-08311-w)
  • [L2] Results suggest two different mechanistic pathways associated with the spinal manipulation target: a decrease of mechanical pain sensitivity independent of clinical outcome (neurophysiological) and a decrease as a reflection of the clinical outcome. (10.1186/s12891-020-03873-3)
  • [L3] Thoracic curves are at greater risk for brace failure than lumbar curves despite similar initial curve magnitudes and average amount of daily brace wear. (10.2106/jbjs.16.01050)
  • [L4] This is the first study to present long-term cumulative treatment outcomes over a median period of 6.3 years on ataluren treatment. (10.1186/s12891-021-04700-z)
  • [L1] The authors suggest a follow-up timeline with time points 4 and 10.5 months after onset when deciding whether to perform surgery. (10.1186/s12891-020-03548-z)
  • [L4] Nonoperative treatment allowed 42% of athletes to return to their previous level of competition at an average of 24.5 weeks after diagnosis. (10.1177/03635465010290010601)
  • [L4] Early diagnosis and aggressive treatment are required in order to obtain a satisfactory outcome. (10.1302/0301-620x.97b9.35626)
  • [L3] Patients with severe intermittent claudication should be carefully followed up because they are significant candidates for deterioration despite the success of conservative treatment. (10.1186/s13018-018-0947-2)

See Also

References

[1] Comparative efficacy of operative versus conservative treatment for Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08100-x

[2] Effective period of conservative treatment in patients with acute calcific periarthritis of the hand. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0997-5

[3] Herniated discs: when is surgery necessary?. EFORT Open Reviews. 2021. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210020

[4] Isthmic Spondylolisthesis in the Adult. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 1996. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-199607000-00004

[5] Spondylodiscitis revisited. EFORT Open Reviews. 2017. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.160062

[6] Factors associated with failed conservative treatment in patients with degenerative full-thickness supraspinatus tears. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2025. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.107b12.bjj-2025-0742.r2

[7] Efficacy of conservative treatment strategies for partial distal biceps tendon ruptures: a case-control study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.04.017

[8] CONTRAIS: CONservative TReatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: a randomised controlled trial protocol. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2013. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-261

[9] Symptom Severity and Conservative Treatment for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Association With Eventual Carpal Tunnel Release. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.04.034

[10] Outcomes following the conservative management of patients with non-radicular peripheral neuropathic pain. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.02.003

[11] Letter Regarding “Cost of Immediate Surgery Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Trigger Finger in Diabetic Patients”. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.03.037

[12] Conservative Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2004. DOI: 10.1177/0095399703258714

[13] Conservative therapy versus arthroscopic surgery of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03187-1

[14] Diagnosis and management of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS): a survey of contemporary physiotherapy practice. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08708-7

[15] Treatment of De Quervain’s Disease: Role of Conservative Management. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2001. DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2001.0568

[16] Influence of curve morphology and location on the efficacy of rigid conservative treatment in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2021. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.103b2.bjj-2020-1113.r2

[17] A value-based care analysis of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with suspected rotator cuff tendinopathy and the implicated role of conservative management. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.003

[18] Trigger Digits: Diagnosis and Treatment. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2001. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200107000-00004

[19] Conservative vs. operative treatment for humeral shaft fractures: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials and observational studies. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.01.072

[20] Evaluation of Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results After Treatment With Casting and Bracing for the Acutely Injured Posterior Cruciate Ligament. Arthroscopy. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.06.030

[21] Non‐surgical management of early knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1713-8

[22] Long-term Outcome of Local Steroid Injections Versus Surgery in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Observational Extension of a Randomized Clinical Trial. HAND. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1558944720944263

[23] Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective Descriptive Study. HAND. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1558944717708025

[24] Nonoperative treatment of the Boutonniere deformity: Is there a difference in outcomes?. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2025.02.013

[25] Nonoperative Management of Posterior Shoulder Instability: An Assessment of Survival and Predictors for Conversion to Surgery at 1 to 10 Years After Diagnosis. Arthroscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.01.056

[26] Use of the Milwaukee Brace for Progressive Idiopathic Scoliosis. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery*. 1996. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199604000-00009

[27] Long-term outcome of nonoperative treatment of Perthes’ disease. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2025. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.107b6.bjj-2024-1310.r1

[28] Long-term follow-up of cases of rotator cuff tear treated conservatively. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.10.012

[29] Conservative management equally effective to new suture anchor technique for acute mallet finger deformity: A prospective randomized clinical trial. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2017.07.006

[30] Conservative Treatment of the Cubital Tunnel Syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2009. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408098480

[31] Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Degenerative Disk Disease. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2009. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200902000-00006

[32] A PRACTICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL GUIDE FOR NON-SURGICAL AND SURGICAL TREATMENT OF CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408087119

[33] Clinical classification of patellofemoral pain syndrome: guidelines for non‐operative treatment. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2005. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-004-0577-6

[34] Non‐surgical treatments for the management of early osteoarthritis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4089-y

[35] The changing pattern of scoliosis treatment due to effective screening.. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1981. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-198163030-00002

[36] Cauda Equina Syndrome. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2008. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200808000-00006

[37] Effect of low-intensity long-duration ultrasound on the symptomatic relief of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0965-0

[38] Conservative Treatments May Show No Significant Differences for Partial‐Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/arj.70022

[39] Management of Posttraumatic Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Contracture. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.014

[40] Classification of gluteal muscle contracture in children and outcome of different treatments. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2009. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-34

[41] Non‐operative treatment of degenerative posterior root tear of the medial meniscus. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0891-0

[42] Guideline on managing thumb base osteoarthritis: The British Society for Surgery of the Hand Evidence for Surgical Treatment (BEST) findings and recommendations. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17531934241313206

[43] Successful conservative treatment of patients with MRI‐verified meniscal lesions. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2494-z

[44] Spinal Orthoses. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeon. 2010. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-201011000-00003

[45] Distal patellar tendinosis: an unusual form of jumper's knee. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0135-5

[46] Extra-Articular Fractures of the Proximal Phalanges of the Fingers: A Comparison of 2 Methods of Functional, Conservative Treatment. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.02.017

[47] Sub-classification based specific movement control exercises are superior to general exercise in sub-acute low back pain when both are combined with manual therapy: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-0986-y

[48] Differences across health care systems in outcome and cost-utility of surgical and conservative treatment of chronic low back pain: a study protocol. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-81

[49] Zoledronic acid is more efficient than ibandronic acid in the treatment of symptomatic bone marrow lesions of the knee. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05598-w

[50] The role of sex, age, and BMI in treatment decisions for knee osteoarthritis: conservative management versus total knee replacement. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05552-2

[51] Effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on chronic low back pain: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07569-w

[52] Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation: Surgical versus conservative treatment. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2007.07.017

[53] Effects of tailored neck-shoulder pain treatment based on a decision model guided by clinical assessments and standardized functional tests. A study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2012. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-75

[54] The effects of a three-week use of lumbosacral orthoses on trunk muscle activity and on the muscular response to trunk perturbations. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2010. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-154

[55] Back injuries and pain in adolescents attending a ski high school. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2003. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-003-0389-0

[56] Consensus on a standardised treatment pathway algorithm for lumbar spinal stenosis: an international Delphi study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05485-5

[57] AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline: Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteochondritis Dissecans. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2011. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-201105000-00008

[58] Conservative or surgical treatment for subacromial impingement syndrome? A systematic review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.01.010

[59] Diagnostic evaluation and nonoperative management of Lisfranc injuries in athletes. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.70244

[60] Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the medial compartment of the knee: a MRI follow‐up after conservative and operative treatment, preliminary results. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2000. DOI: 10.1007/s001670050191

[61] Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis: Prognostic Indicators and Timing of Further Intervention Following Corticosteroid Injection. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.03.025

[62] Wearable technology mediated biofeedback to modulate spine motor control: a scoping review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07867-3

[63] Ophthalmologic Complications Associated With Prone Positioning in Spine Surgery. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2007. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200703000-00005

[64] Effect of different corrective force directions applied by spinal orthoses on the patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08014-8

[65] Curve type, flexibility, correction, and rotation are predictors of curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing conservative treatment. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2022. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.104b4.bjj-2021-1677.r1

[66] Regarding “Long-term follow-up of cases of rotator cuff tear treated conservatively”. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2012.10.027

[67] Unload it: the key to the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1403-6

[68] Lyon bracing in adolescent females with thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study based on SRS and SOSORT criteria. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2015. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0782-0

[69] The effectiveness of land based exercise compared to decompressive surgery in the management of lumbar spinal-canal stenosis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2012. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-30

[70] Does improvement towards a normal cervical sagittal configuration aid in the management of cervical myofascial pain syndrome: a 1- year randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2317-y

[71] A treatment applying a biomechanical device to the feet of patients with knee osteoarthritis results in reduced pain and improved function: a prospective controlled study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2010. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-179

[72] The Efficacy of an Injection of Steroids for Medial Epicondylitis. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). 1997. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199711000-00006

[73] Clinical Commentary in Response to: Effectiveness of Splinting for the Treatment of Trigger Finger. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2008.07.002

[74] A historical perspective of PCL bracing. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2048-9

[75] The clinical course of low back pain: a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2014. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-68

[76] NON-OPERATIVE TREATMENT, INCLUDING MANIPULATION, FOR LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL DISC SYNDROME. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1955. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-195537050-00003

[77] Extending conceptual frameworks: life course epidemiology for the study of back pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2010. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-23

[78] Individuals’ explanations for their persistent or recurrent low back pain: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1831-7

[79] 3D spinal and rib cage predictors of brace effectiveness in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2754-2

[80] Associations between spinal flexibility and bracing outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a literature review. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-04430-z

[81] Successful Conservative Therapy in Rockwood Type V Acromioclavicular Dislocations. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/2325967115s00017

[82] On mobility and gait in scoliosis patients: a comparison of conventional and 3D-printed braces during an instrumented timed-up and go test. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08311-w

[83] Changes in pain sensitivity and spinal stiffness in relation to responder status following spinal manipulative therapy in chronic low Back pain: a secondary explorative analysis of a randomized trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03873-3

[84] Brace Success Is Related to Curve Type in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2017. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.16.01050

[85] Long term treatment with ataluren—the Swedish experience. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04700-z

[86] The incidence of regression after the non-surgical treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03548-z

[87] Nonoperative Treatment of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Throwing Athletes. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2001. DOI: 10.1177/03635465010290010601

[88] Life- and limb-threatening infections following the use of an external fixator. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2015. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.97b9.35626

[89] The factors of deterioration in long-term clinical course of lumbar spinal canal stenosis after successful conservative treatment. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0947-2

Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0

CC Creative Commons licence
BY Attribution — you must credit the source
NC NonCommercial — not for commercial use

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International


Creative Commons Corporation ("Creative Commons") is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Distribution of Creative Commons public licenses does not create a lawyer-client or other relationship. Creative Commons makes its licenses and related information available on an "as-is" basis. Creative Commons gives no warranties regarding its licenses, any material licensed under their terms and conditions, or any related information. Creative Commons disclaims all liability for damages resulting from their use to the fullest extent possible.

Using Creative Commons Public Licenses

Creative Commons public licenses provide a standard set of terms and conditions that creators and other rights holders may use to share original works of authorship and other material subject to copyright and certain other rights specified in the public license below. The following considerations are for informational purposes only, are not exhaustive, and do not form part of our licenses.

Considerations for licensors: Our public licenses are intended for use by those authorized to give the public permission to use material in ways otherwise restricted by copyright and certain other rights. Our licenses are irrevocable. Licensors should read and understand the terms and conditions of the license they choose before applying it. Licensors should also secure all rights necessary before applying our licenses so that the public can reuse the material as expected. Licensors should clearly mark any material not subject to the license. This includes other CC- licensed material, or material used under an exception or limitation to copyright. More considerations for licensors: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensors

Considerations for the public: By using one of our public licenses, a licensor grants the public permission to use the licensed material under specified terms and conditions. If the licensor's permission is not necessary for any reason--for example, because of any applicable exception or limitation to copyright--then that use is not regulated by the license. Our licenses grant only permissions under copyright and certain other rights that a licensor has authority to grant. Use of the licensed material may still be restricted for other reasons, including because others have copyright or other rights in the material. A licensor may make special requests, such as asking that all changes be marked or described. Although not required by our licenses, you are encouraged to respect those requests where reasonable. More considerations for the public: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensees


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License

By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License ("Public License"). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from making the Licensed Material available under these terms and conditions.

Section 1 -- Definitions.

a. Adapted Material means material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights that is derived from or based upon the Licensed Material and in which the Licensed Material is translated, altered, arranged, transformed, or otherwise modified in a manner requiring permission under the Copyright and Similar Rights held by the Licensor. For purposes of this Public License, where the Licensed Material is a musical work, performance, or sound recording, Adapted Material is always produced where the Licensed Material is synched in timed relation with a moving image.

b. Adapter's License means the license You apply to Your Copyright and Similar Rights in Your contributions to Adapted Material in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Public License.

c. Copyright and Similar Rights means copyright and/or similar rights closely related to copyright including, without limitation, performance, broadcast, sound recording, and Sui Generis Database Rights, without regard to how the rights are labeled or categorized. For purposes of this Public License, the rights specified in Section 2(b)(1)-(2) are not Copyright and Similar Rights.

d. Effective Technological Measures means those measures that, in the absence of proper authority, may not be circumvented under laws fulfilling obligations under Article 11 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty adopted on December 20, 1996, and/or similar international agreements.

e. Exceptions and Limitations means fair use, fair dealing, and/or any other exception or limitation to Copyright and Similar Rights that applies to Your use of the Licensed Material.

f. Licensed Material means the artistic or literary work, database, or other material to which the Licensor applied this Public License.

g. Licensed Rights means the rights granted to You subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, which are limited to all Copyright and Similar Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material and that the Licensor has authority to license.

h. Licensor means the individual(s) or entity(ies) granting rights under this Public License.

i. NonCommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation. For purposes of this Public License, the exchange of the Licensed Material for other material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights by digital file-sharing or similar means is NonCommercial provided there is no payment of monetary compensation in connection with the exchange.

j. Share means to provide material to the public by any means or process that requires permission under the Licensed Rights, such as reproduction, public display, public performance, distribution, dissemination, communication, or importation, and to make material available to the public including in ways that members of the public may access the material from a place and at a time individually chosen by them.

k. Sui Generis Database Rights means rights other than copyright resulting from Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases, as amended and/or succeeded, as well as other essentially equivalent rights anywhere in the world.

l. You means the individual or entity exercising the Licensed Rights under this Public License. Your has a corresponding meaning.

Section 2 -- Scope.

a. License grant.

1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material to:

a. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part, for NonCommercial purposes only; and

b. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material for NonCommercial purposes only.

2. Exceptions and Limitations. For the avoidance of doubt, where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with its terms and conditions.

3. Term. The term of this Public License is specified in Section 6(a).

4. Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in all media and formats whether now known or hereafter created, and to make technical modifications necessary to do so. The Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or authority to forbid You from making technical modifications necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License, simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a) (4) never produces Adapted Material.

5. Downstream recipients.

a. Offer from the Licensor -- Licensed Material. Every recipient of the Licensed Material automatically receives an offer from the Licensor to exercise the Licensed Rights under the terms and conditions of this Public License.

b. No downstream restrictions. You may not offer or impose any additional or different terms or conditions on, or apply any Effective Technological Measures to, the Licensed Material if doing so restricts exercise of the Licensed Rights by any recipient of the Licensed Material.

6. No endorsement. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be construed as permission to assert or imply that You are, or that Your use of the Licensed Material is, connected with, or sponsored, endorsed, or granted official status by, the Licensor or others designated to receive attribution as provided in Section 3(a)(1)(A)(i).

b. Other rights.

1. Moral rights, such as the right of integrity, are not licensed under this Public License, nor are publicity, privacy, and/or other similar personality rights; however, to the extent possible, the Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any such rights held by the Licensor to the limited extent necessary to allow You to exercise the Licensed Rights, but not otherwise.

2. Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License.

3. To the extent possible, the Licensor waives any right to collect royalties from You for the exercise of the Licensed Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory licensing scheme. In all other cases the Licensor expressly reserves any right to collect such royalties, including when the Licensed Material is used other than for NonCommercial purposes.

Section 3 -- License Conditions.

Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.

a. Attribution.

1. If You Share the Licensed Material (including in modified form), You must:

a. retain the following if it is supplied by the Licensor with the Licensed Material:

i. identification of the creator(s) of the Licensed Material and any others designated to receive attribution, in any reasonable manner requested by the Licensor (including by pseudonym if designated);

ii. a copyright notice;

iii. a notice that refers to this Public License;

iv. a notice that refers to the disclaimer of warranties;

v. a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable;

b. indicate if You modified the Licensed Material and retain an indication of any previous modifications; and

c. indicate the Licensed Material is licensed under this Public License, and include the text of, or the URI or hyperlink to, this Public License.

2. You may satisfy the conditions in Section 3(a)(1) in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share the Licensed Material. For example, it may be reasonable to satisfy the conditions by providing a URI or hyperlink to a resource that includes the required information.

3. If requested by the Licensor, You must remove any of the information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent reasonably practicable.

4. If You Share Adapted Material You produce, the Adapter's License You apply must not prevent recipients of the Adapted Material from complying with this Public License.

Section 4 -- Sui Generis Database Rights.

Where the Licensed Rights include Sui Generis Database Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material:

a. for the avoidance of doubt, Section 2(a)(1) grants You the right to extract, reuse, reproduce, and Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database for NonCommercial purposes only;

b. if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and

c. You must comply with the conditions in Section 3(a) if You Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 4 supplements and does not replace Your obligations under this Public License where the Licensed Rights include other Copyright and Similar Rights.

Section 5 -- Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability.

a. UNLESS OTHERWISE SEPARATELY UNDERTAKEN BY THE LICENSOR, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE LICENSOR OFFERS THE LICENSED MATERIAL AS-IS AND AS-AVAILABLE, AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND CONCERNING THE LICENSED MATERIAL, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHER. THIS INCLUDES, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ABSENCE OF LATENT OR OTHER DEFECTS, ACCURACY, OR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ERRORS, WHETHER OR NOT KNOWN OR DISCOVERABLE. WHERE DISCLAIMERS OF WARRANTIES ARE NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS DISCLAIMER MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

b. TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, IN NO EVENT WILL THE LICENSOR BE LIABLE TO YOU ON ANY LEGAL THEORY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR OTHER LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS PUBLIC LICENSE OR USE OF THE LICENSED MATERIAL, EVEN IF THE LICENSOR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES. WHERE A LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

c. The disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability provided above shall be interpreted in a manner that, to the extent possible, most closely approximates an absolute disclaimer and waiver of all liability.

Section 6 -- Term and Termination.

a. This Public License applies for the term of the Copyright and Similar Rights licensed here. However, if You fail to comply with this Public License, then Your rights under this Public License terminate automatically.

b. Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under Section 6(a), it reinstates:

1. automatically as of the date the violation is cured, provided it is cured within 30 days of Your discovery of the violation; or

2. upon express reinstatement by the Licensor.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 6(b) does not affect any right the Licensor may have to seek remedies for Your violations of this Public License.

c. For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so will not terminate this Public License.

d. Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 survive termination of this Public License.

Section 7 -- Other Terms and Conditions.

a. The Licensor shall not be bound by any additional or different terms or conditions communicated by You unless expressly agreed.

b. Any arrangements, understandings, or agreements regarding the Licensed Material not stated herein are separate from and independent of the terms and conditions of this Public License.

Section 8 -- Interpretation.

a. For the avoidance of doubt, this Public License does not, and shall not be interpreted to, reduce, limit, restrict, or impose conditions on any use of the Licensed Material that could lawfully be made without permission under this Public License.

b. To the extent possible, if any provision of this Public License is deemed unenforceable, it shall be automatically reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable. If the provision cannot be reformed, it shall be severed from this Public License without affecting the enforceability of the remaining terms and conditions.

c. No term or condition of this Public License will be waived and no failure to comply consented to unless expressly agreed to by the Licensor.

d. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be interpreted as a limitation upon, or waiver of, any privileges and immunities that apply to the Licensor or You, including from the legal processes of any jurisdiction or authority.


Creative Commons is not a party to its public licenses. Notwithstanding, Creative Commons may elect to apply one of its public licenses to material it publishes and in those instances will be considered the “Licensor.” The text of the Creative Commons public licenses is dedicated to the public domain under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication. Except for the limited purpose of indicating that material is shared under a Creative Commons public license or as otherwise permitted by the Creative Commons policies published at creativecommons.org/policies, Creative Commons does not authorize the use of the trademark "Creative Commons" or any other trademark or logo of Creative Commons without its prior written consent including, without limitation, in connection with any unauthorized modifications to any of its public licenses or any other arrangements, understandings, or agreements concerning use of licensed material. For the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the public licenses.

Creative Commons may be contacted at creativecommons.org.