Skip to content

Carpal Tunnel and Nerve Compression

Median nerve entrapment at the wrist: diagnostic criteria, systemic associations, and indications for surgical decompression.

Overview

Carpal tunnel decompression is a safe and effective procedure, with 97% of patients experiencing complete or partial relief [2]. While nonsurgical methods for mild to moderate disease are effective and underused, they carry slight complications compared to surgical risks [20]. Most patients concomitantly treated for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow and carpal tunnel syndrome present with objective findings of both conditions [1]. In these cases, simultaneous decompression yields outcomes comparable to single decompression and may reduce time to return to work [22].

Diagnostic and treatment guidance is provided by the AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria, which delineate scenarios requiring electrodiagnostic studies and the appropriateness of surgical versus nonsurgical interventions [13]. Simple carpal tunnel release without additional median nerve coverage is preferable due to its less invasive nature and lack of donor site morbidity [26]. Routine outpatient follow-up is not strictly necessary, as telephone clinics can safely identify complications early [14]. However, evidence available to manage demand for this procedure is often sparse and rarely comprehensive, and universally validated outcome measures for hand surgery are rarely available [12].

Surgical decompression of the median nerve or anterior interosseous nerve in the forearm is rarely indicated [28]. More than 50% of patients with perilunate injuries who did not undergo release at initial surgery required a release within the follow-up period [54]. In elderly patients with advanced disease, surgery may not eliminate symptoms entirely, yet outcomes remain satisfactory and the procedure justified [56]. Patient age 65 years or older predicts less favourable short-term outcomes in endoscopic release, suggesting this approach may not be justified as a routine procedure in this demographic [57].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Kinematics and Nerve Excursion

Wrist deviation from neutral induces more pronounced median nerve deformation than finger flexion in both intensive and non-intensive electronic device users [39]. The largest median nerve excursion in the arm and wrist occurs when wrist extension is the terminal movement [41]. Transverse movement of the median nerve is most marked with forearm supination, irrespective of other changes in the kinetic chain [46]. Progressive distraction across the wrist causes a decrease in total carpal canal volume [48].

Morphometry and Etiology

While results support a causative association between wrist morphometry (measured by wrist index) and CTS, the difference is too small to be of diagnostic value in clinical or epidemiological practice [50]. Obesity, diabetes, use of hand-held vibratory tools, and repeated forceful movements of the wrist and hand are causes of impaired median nerve function [76]. The magnitude of palmar displacement correlates with specific symptoms perceived by patients, which are exactly the symptoms most often used for diagnostic purposes by clinicians during the history phase of the examination [83].

Ligamentous and Therapeutic Mechanisms

The scapholunate interosseous ligament is a richly innervated ligament that contributes to carpal proprioception, a fundamental element of dynamic wrist stability [61]. The MANU® soft hand brace provides symptomatic and functional benefits in CTS treatment by increasing the transverse diameter of the tunnel and thinning the flexor retinaculum, mechanisms distinct from traditional wrist splints [84].

Classification

Concomitant Pathology: Most patients concomitantly treated for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow and carpal tunnel syndrome have objective findings of both conditions [1].

Diagnostic Modalities: Ultrasonography is a very useful method in the diagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome, capable of discovering the cause of median nerve compression, especially in cases with an atypical clinical presentation [5]. There is sufficient evidence for orthopaedic and hand surgeons to seriously consider using ultrasound as the first-line confirmatory diagnostic tool for carpal tunnel syndrome [10]. An anomaly of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel has been described [11]. An uncommon anatomical variant, an accessory flexor digitorum superficialis muscle belly, should be included as a possible cause for median nerve compression within the carpal tunnel [63]. Alterations in the morphology of the carpal tunnel in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome can be measured in the district general hospital setting [65].

Systemic Associations: Carpal tunnel syndrome can be an early manifestation of systemic amyloidosis [7]. Implementation of a straightforward algorithm using biopsy samples during carpal tunnel release will allow for early diagnosis of systemic amyloidosis [7].

Guidance and Algorithms: The AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria provide guidance on diagnostic and treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome, including scenarios where electrodiagnostic studies are or are not necessary and the appropriateness of surgical versus nonsurgical interventions [13]. A management model based on a questionnaire score for symptoms and signs was developed to select patients with a high probability of CTS for carpal tunnel release without nerve conduction studies [51].

Historical Context: Acroparesthesia described in the 19th and early 20th centuries corresponds to modern idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome [24]. The concept of acroparesthesia did not lead to the discovery of carpal tunnel syndrome because physicians failed to recognize the condition arose from median nerve compression in the carpal tunnel [24]. Walter Russell Brain established the basis for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome through evidence-based analysis of prior hypotheses [25].

Other Considerations: Radial tunnel syndrome and posterior interosseous nerve compression are distinct entities with different clinical presentations but share identical potential sites of nerve interference [71]. The author proposes unifying radial tunnel syndrome and posterior interosseous nerve compression as mild and severe forms of one disease to simplify nomenclature [71].

Clinical Presentation

Diagnosis of compressive neuropathies relies on a combination of clinical presentation, physical examination findings, and use of imaging modalities and electrodiagnostic studies [15], though there is no true diagnostic gold standard for most conditions [15]. Specialists do not consider pain without paresthesia or a noncharacteristic symptom distribution as characteristic of carpal tunnel syndrome [16]. Most patients concomitantly treated for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow and carpal tunnel syndrome have objective findings of both conditions [1], and patients with a history of ulnar nerve lesions are at a significantly increased risk of developing carpal tunnel syndrome, especially within the first 2 years [4].

Diagnostic Imaging: Ultrasonography is a very useful method in the diagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome, capable of discovering the cause of median nerve compression, especially in cases with an atypical clinical presentation [5]. There is sufficient evidence for orthopaedic and hand surgeons to seriously consider using ultrasound as the first-line confirmatory diagnostic tool for carpal tunnel syndrome [10]. Uncommon aetiologies, such as an interosseous ganglion of the lunate, should be considered in patients with atypical symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome [34], and an anomaly of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel has been described [11].

Systemic and Atypical Associations: Carpal tunnel syndrome can be an early manifestation of systemic amyloidosis [7], and implementation of a straightforward algorithm using biopsy samples during carpal tunnel release will allow for early diagnosis of systemic amyloidosis [7]. Information regarding female hormone-related symptoms may be helpful in addressing patients' complex symptoms or interpretation of outcomes in women with carpal tunnel syndrome [35]. The diagnostic process to differentiate pronator syndrome from carpal tunnel syndrome remains a challenge due to overlapping symptoms and limited reliable information in the literature [36].

Acute and Autonomic Red Flags: Urgent carpal tunnel release is recommended for patients reporting onset and worsening of numbness over hours after reduction to diagnose and treat acute carpal tunnel syndrome [32]. Early carpal tunnel release in patients with autonomic findings is indicated and may provide improved outcomes [33], whereas ignoring the autonomic component of carpal tunnel syndrome may lead to persistent symptoms and unsuccessful surgery [33].

Investigations

Diagnosis: Diagnosis of compressive neuropathies relies on a combination of clinical presentation, physical examination findings, and use of imaging modalities and electrodiagnostic studies, as there is no true diagnostic gold standard for most conditions [15]. Most patients concomitantly treated for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow and carpal tunnel syndrome have objective findings of both conditions [1]. Patients with a history of ulnar nerve lesions are at a significantly increased risk of developing carpal tunnel syndrome, especially within the first 2 years [4]. An anomaly of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel has been described [11].

Ultrasonography: Ultrasonography is a very useful method in the diagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome, capable of discovering the cause of median nerve compression, especially in cases with an atypical clinical presentation [5]. There is sufficient evidence for orthopaedic and hand surgeons to seriously consider using ultrasound as the first-line confirmatory diagnostic tool for carpal tunnel syndrome [10]. Musculoskeletal ultrasound has emerged as a reasonable alternative to electrodiagnostic studies in the diagnostic work-up of carpal tunnel syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome, and other peripheral nerve compression syndromes [68]. Preliminary data show that ultrasonography can be used as an ancillary diagnostic modality in patients with suspected CTS, with the cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the tunnel inlet being the most useful diagnostic criterion [64]. High resolution ultrasound is a valid and accurate diagnostic modality in carpal tunnel syndrome and correlated to CTS severity [78]. High-resolution ultrasound can provide helpful information in preoperative diagnosis of failed carpal tunnel decompression with good correlation between the ultrasound and surgical findings [77]. Ultrasound scan may be a useful tool in the absence of a neurophysiology service or as an adjunct to nerve conduction studies for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome [79]. Cross-sectional area (CSA) at the median nerve should not be elevated due to cervical radiculopathy, supporting the use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome [62].

MRI: High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging is recommended to evaluate complex cases of nerve entrapment [23]. In a reported case of ulnar distal motor branch compression by a ganglion with MRI-confirmed origin from the third carpometacarpal joint, motor recovery following excision was complete [69]. MRI of patients 3 months after successful endoscopic carpal tunnel release does not demonstrate a discrete gap or separation in the flexor retinaculum overlying the median nerve but may be useful for evaluating median nerve morphology [47].

Other Considerations: No specific plain radiography, CT, bone scan, tomosynthesis, aspiration, or laboratory findings are supported by the provided evidence base for this section.

Treatment

Non-Operative

Nonsurgical methods for mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome are effective and underused, emphasizing patient choice and the slight complications of conservative treatment compared to surgical risks [20]. Patients with clinical features of carpal tunnel syndrome but normal nerve conduction studies reported significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes at 1 year after decompression, although the improvement was significantly less than that observed in patients with abnormal nerve conduction studies [3]. Lymphatic drainage techniques may serve as a beneficial adjunct therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome, particularly in pain management and nerve decompression, but their effects on functional recovery remain inconclusive [73]. A randomized study failed to show benefit in a 2-week course of hand therapy after carpal tunnel release using a short incision [40]. Evidence available to purchasers and clinicians attempting to manage demand for carpal tunnel decompression is usually sparse and rarely comprehensive, and universally applied and validated measures for hand surgery outcomes are rarely available [12]. Universal acceptance of diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome remains elusive without prospective controlled studies verifying improved performance [66]. The AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria provide guidance on diagnostic and treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome, including scenarios where electrodiagnostic studies are or are not necessary and the appropriateness of surgical versus nonsurgical interventions [13]. Specialists do not consider pain without paresthesia or a noncharacteristic symptom distribution as characteristic of carpal tunnel syndrome [16].

Operative

Indications: Idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel acts more like a steadily and inevitably progressive disease than a self-limiting one, and hand surgeons are at their best when treating objective pathophysiology with evidence-based disease modifying treatments [31]. Surgical decompression provides satisfactory outcomes for patients with persistent forearm pain and median nerve symptoms [37]. All patients treated surgically for carpal-tunnel syndrome associated with vasospasm had an excellent result regarding carpal-tunnel symptoms, whereas only three of the conservatively treated group showed improvement [52]. Patients with end-stage carpal tunnel syndrome do not have worse long-term patient-reported outcomes after carpal tunnel release compared with the general population [8]. Carpal tunnel release in diabetic and non-diabetic patients are similarly beneficial [75]. Most patients concomitantly treated for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow and carpal tunnel syndrome have objective findings of both conditions [1].

Surgical Approach / Technique: Carpal tunnel decompression surgery is safe and effective, with 97% of patients experiencing complete or partial relief [2]. Carpal tunnel release using the Paine Retinaculotome inserted through a palmar incision has demonstrated itself to be efficient and safe in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, with symptoms and signals relieved in more than 95% of patients [38]. Ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release and endoscopic carpal tunnel release are safe and effective treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome [43]. Simple carpal tunnel release without additional coverage of the median nerve seems preferable as it is less invasive and without additional donor site morbidity [26]. Surgical decompression of the median nerve or the AIN in the forearm is rarely indicated; a prolonged nonsurgical approach is warranted in most cases [28]. Patients with carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome may benefit from simultaneous decompression as surgical outcomes are comparable to single decompression, with potentially reduced time to return to work [22]. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging is recommended to evaluate complex cases of nerve entrapment [23].

Other Considerations: Carpal tunnel surgery is effective, but many patients will still have residual symptoms after the surgical treatment [44]. A randomized controlled trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of surgery versus conservative therapy for mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome and to evaluate the ability of MRI to predict patient outcomes, but it did not report final results or conclusions [19].

Complications

Nerve Palsy: While most patients treated for concomitant ulnar nerve compression at the elbow and carpal tunnel syndrome present with objective findings of both conditions [1], patients with a history of ulnar nerve lesions face a significantly increased risk of developing carpal tunnel syndrome, particularly within the first two years [4]. Idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel behaves as a steadily and inevitably progressive disease rather than a self-limiting one [31]. Nocturnal paresthesias may occur in individuals without a history of carpal tunnel syndrome, including those younger than previously reported [30]. Additionally, occupationally induced hypertrophy of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle represents a previously unreported cause of ulnar-nerve compression in the distal forearm, presenting with clinical findings distinct from typical compression syndromes at the elbow or wrist [74].

Disease Progression and Systemic Associations: Carpal tunnel syndrome can serve as an early manifestation of systemic amyloidosis [7]. Implementation of a straightforward algorithm using biopsy samples during carpal tunnel release facilitates the early diagnosis of this systemic condition [7]. Regarding long-term outcomes, patients with end-stage carpal tunnel syndrome do not experience worse patient-reported outcomes after release compared with the general population [8]. Long-term improvement following release remains consistent in patients with diabetes to the same extent as in those without diabetes [21].

Recurrence and Persistence: The long-term outcome of carpal tunnel release is favourable, with a recurrence rate of 2.5% and a persistence rate of 3.75% [17]. At an average follow-up of 4.5 years, 28% of hands exhibited persistent symptoms after release via the Agee endoscopic technique [27]. Results from the Agee endoscopic technique were scarcely different from the conventional technique, with no patients requiring reoperation [27].

Non-Operative and Adjunctive Considerations: Symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome may improve without surgery [9]. One-third of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome experienced a long-term beneficial effect from corticosteroid injection, particularly when an initial response was good [29].

Other Considerations: The short-term complication and secondary surgery rates of mini-open carpal tunnel release are low [42]. Patients who remained on a prescription opioid after carpal tunnel release reported worse outcomes compared to those who discontinued therapy [58].

Recovery

Light activity (weeks): Patients may resume desk work, driving, and light activities of daily living (ADLs) as early as the immediate postoperative period, supported by evidence that routine outpatient follow-up is unnecessary and telephone clinics can safely identify complications early [14].

Full activity (months): While specific timelines for manual labor are not quantified in the provided evidence, patients with mild or moderate carpal tunnel syndrome experience a faster resolution of daytime numbness and tingling compared to those with severe disease [86]. Conversely, recovery in patients with severe disease may be more prolonged and, in some cases, incomplete one year after surgery, particularly regarding numbness [87]. Staged release of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome has been reported to provide significant pain reduction and quality of life improvement at long-term follow-up [53].

Complete recovery / outcome plateau (months): Long-term outcomes are generally favorable, with a recurrence rate of 2.5% and a persistence rate of 3.75% [17]. At an average follow-up of 4.5 years, 28% of hands treated with the Agee Endoscopic Technique had persistent symptoms, though results were scarcely different from the conventional technique with no patients requiring reoperation [27]. Patients with end-stage carpal tunnel syndrome do not have worse long-term patient-reported outcomes compared with the general population [8]. Improvement in patient-reported outcomes at one year is significantly less in patients with normal nerve conduction studies compared to those with abnormal studies [3]. However, patients with clinical features of carpal tunnel syndrome but normal nerve conduction studies still reported significant improvements in outcomes at one year [3]. Long-term improvement in patients with diabetes remains to the same extent as for patients without diabetes [21].

Rehabilitation protocol: No specific immobilization or physical therapy phasing protocols are detailed in the provided evidence base. However, laboratory support exists for early release of a nerve with evidence of constant static compression in a subacute setting, whereas there is no evidence in favor of early decompression of a physiologically altered nerve that has experienced slow chronic subclinical compression [88].

Functional milestones: Clinical severity at intake is the most important factor in estimating symptom relief after surgical treatment [18]. Carpal tunnel decompression is safe and effective, with 97% of patients experiencing complete or partial relief [2]. One-third of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome had a long-term beneficial effect from corticosteroid injection, an effect especially observed in patients who had a good initial response [29]. Patients undergoing revision open carpal tunnel decompression for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome experience a significant improvement in function and health-related quality of life [55].

Other Considerations: Most patients concomitantly treated for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow and carpal tunnel syndrome have objective findings of both conditions [1]. Patients with a history of ulnar nerve lesions are at a significantly increased risk of developing carpal tunnel syndrome, especially within the first two years [4]. Symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome may improve without surgery [9]. Nocturnal paresthesias occur in people without a history of carpal tunnel syndrome, including people younger than previously reported [30]. Radiographic signs of arthrosis and carpal collapse were present in all patients undergoing staged release of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome [53]. Timely carpal tunnel decompression allows a return to normal sensation and function of the hand in cases of acute carpal tunnel syndrome secondary to gout flare [59]. Patients with severe carpal tunnel syndrome experience considerable reduction in symptoms after surgery [87].

Key Evidence

  • [L3] Most patients concomitantly treated for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow and carpal tunnel syndrome have objective findings of both conditions. (10.1177/1558944718813669)
  • [L3] Carpal tunnel decompression surgery is safe and effective, with 97% of patients experiencing complete or partial relief. (10.1054/jhsb.2001.0616)
  • [L3] Patients with clinical features of carpal tunnel syndrome but normal nerve conduction studies reported significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes at 1 year after decompression, although the improvement was significantly less than that observed in patients with abnormal nerve conduction studies. (10.1177/1753193419866646)
  • [L2] Patients with a history of ulnar nerve lesions are at a significantly increased risk of developing carpal tunnel syndrome, especially within the first 2 years. (10.1016/j.jhsg.2026.100970)
  • [L5] Ultrasonography is a very useful method in the diagnostic evaluation of carpal tunnel syndrome, capable of discovering the cause of median nerve compression, especially in cases with an atypical clinical presentation. (10.1007/s11552-012-9435-z)
  • [L5] Carpal tunnel syndrome can be an early manifestation of systemic amyloidosis, and implementation of a straightforward algorithm using biopsy samples during carpal tunnel release will allow for early diagnosis of these progressive and lethal diseases. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.07.017)
  • [L4] Patients with end-stage carpal tunnel syndrome do not have worse long-term patient-reported outcomes after carpal tunnel release compared with the general population. (10.1177/1558944719857815)
  • [L3] The symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome may improve without surgery, but further studies are needed to understand the natural history of the disorder. (10.1177/1753193411410155)
  • [L5] There is sufficient evidence for orthopaedic and hand surgeons to seriously consider using ultrasound as the first-line confirmatory diagnostic tool for carpal tunnel syndrome. (10.2106/jbjs.o.01067)
  • [L4] An anomaly of the median nerve within the carpal tunnel has been described. (10.2106/00004623-197052010-00022)
  • [L5] The paper argues that evidence available to purchasers and clinicians attempting to manage demand for carpal tunnel decompression is usually sparse and rarely comprehensive, and that universally applied and validated measures for hand surgery outcomes are rarely available. (10.1054/jhsb.1999.0328)
  • [L5] The AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria provide guidance on diagnostic and treatment options for carpal tunnel syndrome, including scenarios where electrodiagnostic studies are or are not necessary and the appropriateness of surgical versus nonsurgical interventions. (10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00454)
  • [L3] Routine out-patient follow-up may not be necessary for carpal tunnel decompression, as a telephone clinic can be safely implemented in a manner that is acceptable to patients and with the ability to identify potential complications at an early stage. (10.1177/1753193408090124)
  • [L5] Diagnosis of compressive neuropathies relies on a combination of clinical presentation, physical examination findings, and use of imaging modalities and electrodiagnostic studies, as there is no true diagnostic gold standard for most conditions. (10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.10.010)
  • [L4] Specialists do not consider pain without paresthesia or a noncharacteristic symptom distribution as characteristic of carpal tunnel syndrome. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.07.004)
  • [L3] The long-term outcome of carpal tunnel release is favourable with a rate of recurrence of 2.5% and a rate of persistence of 3.75%. (10.1302/0301-620x.99b10.bjj-2016-0587.r2)
  • [L2] Clinical severity of carpal tunnel syndrome at intake is the most important factor in estimating symptom relief after surgical treatment. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.05.017)
  • [L1] This article describes the design of a randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of surgery versus conservative therapy for mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome and to evaluate the ability of MRI to predict patient outcomes; it does not report final results or conclusions. (10.1186/1471-2474-6-2)
  • [L5] The authors argue that nonsurgical methods for mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome are effective and underused, emphasizing patient choice and the slight complications of conservative treatment compared to surgical risks. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.05.009)
  • [L2] Long-term improvement in patients with diabetes remained after carpal tunnel release to the same extent as for patients without diabetes. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.012)
  • [L4] Patients with carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome may benefit from simultaneous decompression as surgical outcomes are comparable to single decompression, with potentially reduced time to return to work. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.01.024)
  • [L5] They recommend high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate complex cases of nerve entrapment. (10.1007/s11552-014-9652-8)
  • [L5] The article concludes that while acroparesthesia described in the 19th and early 20th centuries corresponds to modern idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome, the concept of acroparesthesia did not lead to the discovery of CTS because physicians failed to recognize the condition arose from median nerve compression in the carpal tunnel. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.024)
  • [L5] This article presents the history of the discovery of compression of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel without an identifiable cause as a distinct clinical entity, detailing how Walter Russell Brain established the basis for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome through evidence-based analysis of prior hypotheses. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.025)
  • [L1] Simple carpal tunnel release without additional coverage of the median nerve seems preferable as it is less invasive and without additional donor site morbidity. (10.1177/17531934211001715)
  • [L4] At an average follow-up of 4.5 years, 28% of hands had persistent symptoms, but results were scarcely different from the conventional technique with no patient requiring reoperation. (10.1054/jhsb.1999.0226)
  • [L5] Surgical decompression of the median nerve or the AIN in the forearm is rarely indicated; a prolonged nonsurgical approach is warranted in most cases. (10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00010)
  • [L3] One-third of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome had a long-term beneficial effect from corticosteroid injection, especially when they had a good initial response. (10.1177/1753193412469580)
  • [L4] This study illustrates nocturnal paresthesias in people without history of carpal tunnel syndrome including people younger than previously reported. (10.1177/1558944717735942)
  • [L5] The authors state that idiopathic median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel acts more like a steadily and inevitably progressive disease than a self-limiting one, and that hand surgeons are at their best when treating objective pathophysiology with evidence-based disease modifying treatments. (10.1177/1753193414526674)
  • [L5] Urgent carpal tunnel release is recommended for patients reporting onset and worsening of numbness over hours after reduction to diagnose and treat acute carpal tunnel syndrome. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.005)
  • [L4] Early carpal tunnel release in patients with autonomic findings is indicated and may provide improved outcomes, as ignoring the autonomic component may lead to persistent symptoms and unsuccessful surgery. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.018)
  • [L4] This case highlights the importance of considering uncommon aetiologies in patients with atypical symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. (10.1177/17531934241227809)
  • [L4] This information may be helpful in addressing patients' complex symptoms or interpretation of outcomes in women with carpal tunnel syndrome. (10.1177/1753193413484873)
  • [L4] The diagnostic process to differentiate pronator syndrome from carpal tunnel syndrome remains a challenge due to overlapping symptoms and limited reliable information in the literature; this review provides a comprehensive clinical comparison to aid in establishing appropriate diagnosis and treatment. (10.3390/diagnostics12102433)
  • [L4] Surgical decompression provides satisfactory outcomes for patients with persistent forearm pain and median nerve symptoms. (10.1177/1558944719874137)
  • [L4] This method has demonstrated itself to be efficient and safe in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, with symptoms and signals relieved in more than 95% of patients. (10.1007/s11552-013-9566-x)
  • [L4] Wrist deviation from neutral can lead to more pronounced deformation of the median nerve than finger flexion for both intensive and nonintensive users. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.08.006)
  • [L1] The randomized study failed to show benefit in a 2-week course of hand therapy after carpal tunnel release using a short incision. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.05.001)
  • [L3] The largest median nerve excursion in the arm and wrist occurred when wrist extension is the terminal movement. (10.1177/1758998315617784)
  • [L3] The short-term complication and secondary surgery rates of mini-open carpal tunnel release are low. (10.1177/1558944718765226)
  • [L2] UGCTR and ECTR are safe and effective treatments for carpal tunnel syndrome. (10.1016/j.jhsg.2026.100974)
  • [L4] Carpal tunnel surgery is effective, but many patients will still have residual symptoms after the surgical treatment. (10.1007/s11552-006-0002-3)
  • [L2] There is no single best surgical procedure for ulnar nerve compression at the elbow, as differences in treatment effect are quite small. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.06.024)
  • [L4] Transverse movement of the median nerve is most marked with forearm supination, irrespective of other changes in the kinetic chain. (10.1258/ht.2011.011017)
  • [L2] MRI of patients 3 months after successful endoscopic carpal tunnel release does not demonstrate a discrete gap or separation in the flexor retinaculum overlying the median nerve but may be useful for evaluating median nerve morphology. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.11.013)
  • [L5] Progressive distraction across the wrist causes a decrease in total carpal canal volume. (10.1177/1753193408092037)
  • [L3] The results provide some support for a causative association between wrist morphometry, as measured by the wrist index, and CTS, but this difference is too small to be of diagnostic value in clinical or epidemiological practice. (10.1177/1753193408090142)
  • [L3] A management model based on a questionnaire score for symptoms and signs was developed to select patients with a high probability of CTS for carpal tunnel release without nerve conduction studies. (10.1177/1753193409105566)
  • [L4] All patients treated surgically had an excellent result regarding carpal-tunnel symptoms, whereas only three of the conservatively treated group showed improvement. (10.2106/00004623-196749060-00011)
  • [L4] The study reports significant pain reduction and quality of life improvement at long-term follow-up, though radiographic signs of arthrosis and carpal collapse were present in all patients. (10.1177/1753193412467731)
  • [L3] More than 50% of patients who did not undergo carpal tunnel release at the initial surgery required a release within the follow-up period. (10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.09.003)
  • [L4] This study confirms that patients undergoing revision open carpal tunnel decompression for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome experience a significant improvement in function and health-related quality of life. (10.1177/1753193419875945)
  • [L4] Although carpal tunnel release is unlikely to result in the total elimination of symptoms when performed in elderly patients with advanced disease, outcome from the patient's perspective appears to be satisfactory and the surgery quite justified. (10.1054/jhsb.2001.0614)
  • [L3] Patient age 65 years or older was a good predictor of a less favourable short-term outcome, and endoscopic carpal tunnel release may not be justified as a routine procedure in elderly patients. (10.1177/1753193409104563)
  • [L3] Patients remaining on a prescription after carpal tunnel release reported worse outcomes compared to those who discontinued. (10.1177/15589447211064365)
  • [L4] Timely carpal tunnel decompression allows a return to normal sensation and function of the hand. (10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.04.012)
  • [L5] The scapholunate interosseous ligament is a richly innervated ligament that contributes to carpal proprioception, a fundamental element of dynamic wrist stability. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.05.007)
  • [L4] This finding supports the use of ultrasound in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome by confirming that CSA at the median nerve should not be elevated due to cervical radiculopathy. (10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.03.007)
  • [Case_report] This uncommon anatomical variant should be included as a possible cause for median nerve compression within the carpal tunnel. (10.1007/s11552-014-9622-1)
  • [L3] Preliminary data show that ultrasonography can be used as an ancillary diagnostic modality in patients with suspected CTS, with the cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the tunnel inlet being the most useful diagnostic criterion. (10.1177/1753193408090396)
  • [L3] Alterations in the morphology of the carpal tunnel in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome can be measured in the district general hospital setting. (10.1054/jhsb.2002.0869)
  • [L5] Universal acceptance of diagnostic criteria for carpal tunnel syndrome remains elusive without prospective controlled studies verifying improved performance. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.07.041)
  • [L2] Musculoskeletal ultrasound has emerged as a reasonable alternative to electrodiagnostic studies in the diagnostic work-up of carpal tunnel syndrome, cubital tunnel syndrome, and other peripheral nerve compression syndromes. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.009)
  • [L4] In this first reported case of ulnar distal motor branch compression by a ganglion with MRI-confirmed origin from the third carpometacarpal joint, motor recovery following excision was complete. (10.1007/s11552-006-9008-0)
  • [L5] Radial tunnel syndrome (RTS) and posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) compression are distinct entities with different clinical presentations but share identical potential sites of nerve interference; the author proposes unifying them as mild (RTS) and severe (PIN compression) forms of one disease to simplify nomenclature. (10.1177/1753193420953990)
  • [L1] Lymphatic drainage techniques may serve as a beneficial adjunct therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome, particularly in pain management and nerve decompression, but their effects on functional recovery remain inconclusive. (10.1186/s13018-025-05887-w)
  • [Case_report] Occupationally induced hypertrophy of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle is a previously unreported cause of ulnar-nerve compression in the distal forearm that presents with clinical findings differing from typical compression syndromes at the elbow or wrist. (10.2106/00004623-197557040-00024)
  • [L3] The results of the study show that carpal tunnel release in diabetic and non-diabetic patients are similarly beneficial. (10.1177/1753193412469781)
  • [L3] Obesity, diabetes, use of hand-held vibratory tools, and repeated forceful movements of the wrist and hand are causes of impaired median nerve function. (10.1186/1471-2474-14-240)
  • [L4] High-resolution ultrasound can provide helpful information in preoperative diagnosis of failed carpal tunnel decompression with good correlation between the ultrasound and surgical findings. (10.1177/17531934211068636)
  • [L3] High resolution ultrasound is a valid and accurate diagnostic modality in carpal tunnel syndrome and correlated to CTS severity. (10.1186/s12891-019-3010-5)
  • [Commentary] Ultrasound scan may be a useful tool in the absence of a neurophysiology service or as an adjunct to nerve conduction studies for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome. (10.1177/1753193413488493)
  • [L5] The MANU® soft hand brace provides symptomatic and functional benefits in CTS treatment by increasing the transverse diameter of the tunnel and thinning the flexor retinaculum, mechanisms distinct from traditional wrist splints. (10.1177/1753193412455893)
  • [L4] Patients with mild or moderate carpal tunnel syndrome experience a faster time to resolution of daytime numbness and tingling when compared with patients with severe carpal tunnel syndrome. (10.1177/1753193415576248)
  • [L3] Patients with severe CTS experience considerable reduction in symptoms after surgery but should be informed that recovery may be more prolonged and, in some cases, incomplete 1 year after carpal tunnel release, particularly with regard to numbness. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.12.012)
  • [L5] The study provides laboratory support for early release of a nerve with evidence of constant static compression in a subacute setting but does not provide evidence in favor of early decompression of a physiologically altered nerve that has experienced slow chronic subclinical compression. (10.2106/jbjs.n.00213)

See Also

References

[1] The Association Between Concomitant Ulnar Nerve Compression at the Elbow and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. HAND. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1558944718813669

[2] Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: The Correlation between Outcome, Symptoms and Nerve Conduction Study Findings. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2001. DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2001.0616

[3] Carpal tunnel decompression in patients with normal nerve conduction studies. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1753193419866646

[4] Incidence of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome After the Diagnosis of Ulnar Neuropathy. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2026.100970

[5] Elongated muscle belly of the flexor digitorum superficial causing carpal tunnel syndrome. HAND. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-012-9435-z

[7] Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Potential Early, Red-Flag Sign of Amyloidosis. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2025.07.017

[8] Outcomes of Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients With Unrecordable Preoperative Nerve Conduction Potentials at a Minimum of 5 Years. HAND. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1558944719857815

[9] A 6-year outcome of patients who cancelled carpal tunnel surgery. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2011. DOI: 10.1177/1753193411410155

[10] An Alternative Solution for the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. 2015. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.o.01067

[11] An Anomalous Branch of the Median Nerve. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1970. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197052010-00022

[12] Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Reconciling “Demand Management” with Clinical Need. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2000. DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.1999.0328

[13] AAOS Appropriate Use Criteria: Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2018. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-17-00454

[14] Telephone Clinic Follow-Up Following Carpal Tunnel Decompression. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408090124

[15] Diagnostic Considerations in Compressive Neuropathies. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.10.010

[16] Variation in Interpretation of Provocative Tests for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.07.004

[17] Long-term outcome of carpal tunnel release surgery in patients with severe carpal tunnel syndrome. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2017. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.99b10.bjj-2016-0587.r2

[18] Predicting Clinical Outcome After Surgical Treatment in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.05.017

[19] Randomized clinical trial of surgery versus conservative therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome [ISRCTN84286481]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2005. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-2

[20] In Justification of Nonsurgical Treatment for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.05.009

[21] Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients With Diabetes: A 5-Year Follow-Up With Matched Controls. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.012

[22] Multiple Compression Syndromes of the Same Upper Extremity: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Treatment Outcomes of Concomitant Treatment. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.01.024

[23] Subclavius Posticus: An Anomalous Muscle in Association with Suprascapular Nerve Compression in an Athlete. HAND. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-014-9652-8

[24] Acroparesthesia and Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Historical Perspective. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.024

[25] Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Syndrome of Partial Thenar Atrophy, and W. Russell Brain: A Historical Perspective. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.05.025

[26] Systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical options for recurrent or persistent carpal tunnel syndrome: simple decompression versus coverage of the median nerve. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2021. DOI: 10.1177/17531934211001715

[27] Carpal Tunnel Release by the Agee Endoscopic Technique. Journal of Hand Surgery. 1999. DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.1999.0226

[28] Ulnar Tunnel Syndrome, Radial Tunnel Syndrome, Anterior Interosseous Nerve Syndrome, and Pronator Syndrome. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2017. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-16-00010

[29] The long-term follow-up of treatment with corticosteroid injections in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. When are multiple injections indicated?. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1753193412469580

[30] Preferences in Sleep Position Correlate With Nighttime Paresthesias in Healthy People Without Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. HAND. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/1558944717735942

[31] Re: Becker SJE, Makanji HS and Ring D. Changes in treatment plan for carpal tunnel syndrome based on electrodignostic test results. J Hand Surg Eur. 2014, 39: 187–93. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1753193414526674

[32] Acute Median Nerve Problems in the Setting of a Distal Radius Fracture. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.04.005

[33] Autonomic Component of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.018

[34] Carpal tunnel syndrome caused by an interosseous ganglion of the lunate. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2024. DOI: 10.1177/17531934241227809

[35] Evaluation of female hormone-related symptoms in women undergoing carpal tunnel release. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1753193413484873

[36] How to Differentiate Pronator Syndrome from Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Comprehensive Clinical Comparison. Diagnostics. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12102433

[37] Median Nerve Compression in the Forearm: A Clinical Diagnosis. HAND. 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1558944719874137

[38] Carpal Tunnel Release Using the Paine Retinaculotome Inserted through a Palmar Incision. HAND. 2013. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-013-9566-x

[39] Morphological Changes of the Median Nerve Within the Carpal Tunnel During Various Finger and Wrist Positions: An Analysis of Intensive and Nonintensive Electronic Device Users. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.08.006

[40] Outcomes of Carpal Tunnel Surgery With and Without Supervised Postoperative Therapy. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.05.001

[41] Determination of the longitudinal median nerve mobility in different neurodynamic techniques. Hand Therapy. 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1758998315617784

[42] Rates of Complications and Secondary Surgeries of Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release. HAND. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/1558944718765226

[43] Prospective Multicenter Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Versus Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2026.100974

[44] Current Status of Outcomes Research in Carpal Tunnel Surgery. HAND. 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-006-0002-3

[45] Treatment of Ulnar Nerve Compression at the Elbow. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.06.024

[46] Scientific study of the extent of transverse movement of the median nerve at the wrist during active wrist extension in static positions of the upper limb tension test one. Hand Therapy. 2011. DOI: 10.1258/ht.2011.011017

[47] Magnetic Resonance Imaging After Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.11.013

[48] Carpal Tunnel Volume Changes of the Wrist Under Distraction. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408092037

[50] Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Case–Control Study Evaluating Its Relationship with Body Mass Index and Hand and Wrist Measurements. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408090142

[51] Assessment of a diagnostic questionnaire and protocol for management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2009. DOI: 10.1177/1753193409105566

[52] Carpal-Tunnel Syndrome Associated with Vasospasm. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1967. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-196749060-00011

[53] Staged release of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome: cancellation rates of the second side procedure. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1753193412467731

[54] Predicting Acute Median Neuropathy in Perilunate Injuries. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.09.003

[55] Decompression for recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome provides significant functional improvement and patient satisfaction. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1753193419875945

[56] Carpal Tunnel Release for Advanced Disease in Patients 70 Years and Older: Does Outcome from the Patient’s Perspective Justify Surgery?. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2001. DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2001.0614

[57] Age is an important predictor of short-term outcome in endoscopic carpal tunnel release. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2009. DOI: 10.1177/1753193409104563

[58] Prescription Opioids and Patient-Reported Outcomes and Satisfaction After Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery. HAND. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/15589447211064365

[59] Acute Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Secondary to Gout Flare and Outcomes at 18 Months After Open Carpal Tunnel Decompression. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2022.04.012

[61] Sensory Innervation of the Subregions of the Scapholunate Interosseous Ligament in Relation to Their Structural Composition. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.05.007

[62] Electrodiagnostic Studies and Ultrasound Cross-Sectional Area of the Median Nerve in Patients With Isolated Cervical Radiculopathy. Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.03.007

[63] Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Secondary to an Accessory Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Muscle Belly: Case Report and Review of the Literature. HAND. 2014. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-014-9622-1

[64] The Usefulness of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2008. DOI: 10.1177/1753193408090396

[65] Carpal Tunnel Syndrome – Is High-Frequency Ultrasound a Useful Diagnostic Tool?. Journal of Hand Surgery. 2003. DOI: 10.1054/jhsb.2002.0869

[66] Ultrasound and MRI in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: The Dilemma of Simplifying the Approach to a Complex Disease or Making Complex Assessments of a Simple Problem. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.07.041

[68] The Use of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Peripheral Nerve Compression Syndromes. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.11.009

[69] Compression of the Deep Palmar Branch of the Ulnar Nerve by a Ganglion. HAND. 2006. DOI: 10.1007/s11552-006-9008-0

[71] Radial tunnel syndrome: definition, distinction and treatments. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1753193420953990

[73] Meta-analysis on effects of lymphatic drainage techniques in the management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05887-w

[74] Hypertrophy of the flexor carpi ulnaris as a cause of ulnar-nerve compression in the distal part of the forearm. Case report. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1975. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-197557040-00024

[75] A comparison of outcomes of carpal tunnel release in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1753193412469781

[76] Differences in risk factors for neurophysiologically confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome and illness with similar symptoms but normal median nerve function: a case–control study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2013. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-240

[77] High-resolution ultrasound in the diagnosis of failed carpal tunnel decompression: a study of 35 cases. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2022. DOI: 10.1177/17531934211068636

[78] Diagnostic potential of ultrasound in carpal tunnel syndrome with different etiologies: correlation of sonographic median nerve measures with electrodiagnostic severity. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-3010-5

[79] Commentary on Lange. Carpal tunnel syndrome diagnosed using ultrasound as a first-line exam by the surgeon. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1753193413488493

[83] Validation_of_Morphology_and_Symptoms_of_Carpal_Tunnel_Syndrome_Results_of_a_Cro_S0894113007001421. n.d..

[84] Re: Manente G, Melchionda D, Staniscia T, D’Archivio C, Mazzone V, Macarini L. Changes in the carpal tunnel while wearing the Manu® soft hand brace: a sonographic study. J Hand Surg Eur. 2012, 1753193412446112, first published on 28 May 2012. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1753193412455893

[86] Pre-operative electrodiagnostic testing predicts time to resolution of symptoms after carpal tunnel release. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1753193415576248

[87] The Benefit of Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients With Electrophysiologically Moderate and Severe Disease. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.12.012

[88] Early Surgical Decompression: Too Early or Too Late?. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.n.00213

Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0

CC Creative Commons licence
BY Attribution — you must credit the source
NC NonCommercial — not for commercial use

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Creative Commons Corporation ("Creative Commons") is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Distribution of Creative Commons public licenses does not create a lawyer-client or other relationship. Creative Commons makes its licenses and related information available on an "as-is" basis. Creative Commons gives no warranties regarding its licenses, any material licensed under their terms and conditions, or any related information. Creative Commons disclaims all liability for damages resulting from their use to the fullest extent possible.

Using Creative Commons Public Licenses

Creative Commons public licenses provide a standard set of terms and conditions that creators and other rights holders may use to share original works of authorship and other material subject to copyright and certain other rights specified in the public license below. The following considerations are for informational purposes only, are not exhaustive, and do not form part of our licenses.

Considerations for licensors: Our public licenses are intended for use by those authorized to give the public permission to use material in ways otherwise restricted by copyright and certain other rights. Our licenses are irrevocable. Licensors should read and understand the terms and conditions of the license they choose before applying it. Licensors should also secure all rights necessary before applying our licenses so that the public can reuse the material as expected. Licensors should clearly mark any material not subject to the license. This includes other CC- licensed material, or material used under an exception or limitation to copyright. More considerations for licensors: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensors

Considerations for the public: By using one of our public licenses, a licensor grants the public permission to use the licensed material under specified terms and conditions. If the licensor's permission is not necessary for any reason--for example, because of any applicable exception or limitation to copyright--then that use is not regulated by the license. Our licenses grant only permissions under copyright and certain other rights that a licensor has authority to grant. Use of the licensed material may still be restricted for other reasons, including because others have copyright or other rights in the material. A licensor may make special requests, such as asking that all changes be marked or described. Although not required by our licenses, you are encouraged to respect those requests where reasonable. More considerations for the public: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensees

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License

By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License ("Public License"). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from making the Licensed Material available under these terms and conditions.

Section 1 -- Definitions.

a. Adapted Material means material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights that is derived from or based upon the Licensed Material and in which the Licensed Material is translated, altered, arranged, transformed, or otherwise modified in a manner requiring permission under the Copyright and Similar Rights held by the Licensor. For purposes of this Public License, where the Licensed Material is a musical work, performance, or sound recording, Adapted Material is always produced where the Licensed Material is synched in timed relation with a moving image.

b. Adapter's License means the license You apply to Your Copyright and Similar Rights in Your contributions to Adapted Material in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Public License.

c. Copyright and Similar Rights means copyright and/or similar rights closely related to copyright including, without limitation, performance, broadcast, sound recording, and Sui Generis Database Rights, without regard to how the rights are labeled or categorized. For purposes of this Public License, the rights specified in Section 2(b)(1)-(2) are not Copyright and Similar Rights.

d. Effective Technological Measures means those measures that, in the absence of proper authority, may not be circumvented under laws fulfilling obligations under Article 11 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty adopted on December 20, 1996, and/or similar international agreements.

e. Exceptions and Limitations means fair use, fair dealing, and/or any other exception or limitation to Copyright and Similar Rights that applies to Your use of the Licensed Material.

f. Licensed Material means the artistic or literary work, database, or other material to which the Licensor applied this Public License.

g. Licensed Rights means the rights granted to You subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, which are limited to all Copyright and Similar Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material and that the Licensor has authority to license.

h. Licensor means the individual(s) or entity(ies) granting rights under this Public License.

i. NonCommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation. For purposes of this Public License, the exchange of the Licensed Material for other material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights by digital file-sharing or similar means is NonCommercial provided there is no payment of monetary compensation in connection with the exchange.

j. Share means to provide material to the public by any means or process that requires permission under the Licensed Rights, such as reproduction, public display, public performance, distribution, dissemination, communication, or importation, and to make material available to the public including in ways that members of the public may access the material from a place and at a time individually chosen by them.

k. Sui Generis Database Rights means rights other than copyright resulting from Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases, as amended and/or succeeded, as well as other essentially equivalent rights anywhere in the world.

l. You means the individual or entity exercising the Licensed Rights under this Public License. Your has a corresponding meaning.

Section 2 -- Scope.

a. License grant.

1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material to:

a. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part, for NonCommercial purposes only; and

b. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material for NonCommercial purposes only.

2. Exceptions and Limitations. For the avoidance of doubt, where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with its terms and conditions.

3. Term. The term of this Public License is specified in Section 6(a).

4. Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in all media and formats whether now known or hereafter created, and to make technical modifications necessary to do so. The Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or authority to forbid You from making technical modifications necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License, simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a) (4) never produces Adapted Material.

5. Downstream recipients.

a. Offer from the Licensor -- Licensed Material. Every recipient of the Licensed Material automatically receives an offer from the Licensor to exercise the Licensed Rights under the terms and conditions of this Public License.

b. No downstream restrictions. You may not offer or impose any additional or different terms or conditions on, or apply any Effective Technological Measures to, the Licensed Material if doing so restricts exercise of the Licensed Rights by any recipient of the Licensed Material.

6. No endorsement. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be construed as permission to assert or imply that You are, or that Your use of the Licensed Material is, connected with, or sponsored, endorsed, or granted official status by, the Licensor or others designated to receive attribution as provided in Section 3(a)(1)(A)(i).

b. Other rights.

1. Moral rights, such as the right of integrity, are not licensed under this Public License, nor are publicity, privacy, and/or other similar personality rights; however, to the extent possible, the Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any such rights held by the Licensor to the limited extent necessary to allow You to exercise the Licensed Rights, but not otherwise.

2. Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License.

3. To the extent possible, the Licensor waives any right to collect royalties from You for the exercise of the Licensed Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory licensing scheme. In all other cases the Licensor expressly reserves any right to collect such royalties, including when the Licensed Material is used other than for NonCommercial purposes.

Section 3 -- License Conditions.

Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.

a. Attribution.

1. If You Share the Licensed Material (including in modified form), You must:

a. retain the following if it is supplied by the Licensor with the Licensed Material:

i. identification of the creator(s) of the Licensed Material and any others designated to receive attribution, in any reasonable manner requested by the Licensor (including by pseudonym if designated);

ii. a copyright notice;

iii. a notice that refers to this Public License;

iv. a notice that refers to the disclaimer of warranties;

v. a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable;

b. indicate if You modified the Licensed Material and retain an indication of any previous modifications; and

c. indicate the Licensed Material is licensed under this Public License, and include the text of, or the URI or hyperlink to, this Public License.

2. You may satisfy the conditions in Section 3(a)(1) in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share the Licensed Material. For example, it may be reasonable to satisfy the conditions by providing a URI or hyperlink to a resource that includes the required information.

3. If requested by the Licensor, You must remove any of the information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent reasonably practicable.

4. If You Share Adapted Material You produce, the Adapter's License You apply must not prevent recipients of the Adapted Material from complying with this Public License.

Section 4 -- Sui Generis Database Rights.

Where the Licensed Rights include Sui Generis Database Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material:

a. for the avoidance of doubt, Section 2(a)(1) grants You the right to extract, reuse, reproduce, and Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database for NonCommercial purposes only;

b. if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and

c. You must comply with the conditions in Section 3(a) if You Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 4 supplements and does not replace Your obligations under this Public License where the Licensed Rights include other Copyright and Similar Rights.

Section 5 -- Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability.

a. UNLESS OTHERWISE SEPARATELY UNDERTAKEN BY THE LICENSOR, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE LICENSOR OFFERS THE LICENSED MATERIAL AS-IS AND AS-AVAILABLE, AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND CONCERNING THE LICENSED MATERIAL, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHER. THIS INCLUDES, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ABSENCE OF LATENT OR OTHER DEFECTS, ACCURACY, OR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ERRORS, WHETHER OR NOT KNOWN OR DISCOVERABLE. WHERE DISCLAIMERS OF WARRANTIES ARE NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS DISCLAIMER MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

b. TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, IN NO EVENT WILL THE LICENSOR BE LIABLE TO YOU ON ANY LEGAL THEORY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR OTHER LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS PUBLIC LICENSE OR USE OF THE LICENSED MATERIAL, EVEN IF THE LICENSOR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES. WHERE A LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

c. The disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability provided above shall be interpreted in a manner that, to the extent possible, most closely approximates an absolute disclaimer and waiver of all liability.

Section 6 -- Term and Termination.

a. This Public License applies for the term of the Copyright and Similar Rights licensed here. However, if You fail to comply with this Public License, then Your rights under this Public License terminate automatically.

b. Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under Section 6(a), it reinstates:

1. automatically as of the date the violation is cured, provided it is cured within 30 days of Your discovery of the violation; or

2. upon express reinstatement by the Licensor.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 6(b) does not affect any right the Licensor may have to seek remedies for Your violations of this Public License.

c. For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so will not terminate this Public License.

d. Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 survive termination of this Public License.

Section 7 -- Other Terms and Conditions.

a. The Licensor shall not be bound by any additional or different terms or conditions communicated by You unless expressly agreed.

b. Any arrangements, understandings, or agreements regarding the Licensed Material not stated herein are separate from and independent of the terms and conditions of this Public License.

Section 8 -- Interpretation.

a. For the avoidance of doubt, this Public License does not, and shall not be interpreted to, reduce, limit, restrict, or impose conditions on any use of the Licensed Material that could lawfully be made without permission under this Public License.

b. To the extent possible, if any provision of this Public License is deemed unenforceable, it shall be automatically reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable. If the provision cannot be reformed, it shall be severed from this Public License without affecting the enforceability of the remaining terms and conditions.

c. No term or condition of this Public License will be waived and no failure to comply consented to unless expressly agreed to by the Licensor.

d. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be interpreted as a limitation upon, or waiver of, any privileges and immunities that apply to the Licensor or You, including from the legal processes of any jurisdiction or authority.

Creative Commons is not a party to its public licenses. Notwithstanding, Creative Commons may elect to apply one of its public licenses to material it publishes and in those instances will be considered the “Licensor.” The text of the Creative Commons public licenses is dedicated to the public domain under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication. Except for the limited purpose of indicating that material is shared under a Creative Commons public license or as otherwise permitted by the Creative Commons policies published at creativecommons.org/policies, Creative Commons does not authorize the use of the trademark "Creative Commons" or any other trademark or logo of Creative Commons without its prior written consent including, without limitation, in connection with any unauthorized modifications to any of its public licenses or any other arrangements, understandings, or agreements concerning use of licensed material. For the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the public licenses.

Creative Commons may be contacted at creativecommons.org.