Skip to content

What's New — Spine — November 2025

32 new articles published this month.

Themes: Biomechanics and Implant Mechanics · Disc Degeneration and Molecular Mechanisms · Surgical Techniques and Technology · Scoliosis Management and Screening · Osteoporosis and Bone Health · Epidemiology, Outcomes, and Rehabilitation

Digest generated 2026-04-16 00:31:26+00:00.


Highlights

Biomechanics and Implant Mechanics

Recent studies have significantly advanced the understanding of spinal biomechanics and implant performance through finite element analysis and in vitro testing. Research by Inoue et al. [2] and Jin et al. [4] utilized finite element models to clarify mechanical stress distributions in rod fractures and the rational development of cervical kyphosis, respectively. In the realm of implants, Chin et al. [9] compared wear particles between viscoelastic discs and total disc replacements, highlighting inflammation risks. Furthermore, Ribeiro et al. [15] evaluated the segmental range of motion in vertebral body tethering constructs, demonstrating their ability to preserve mobility. These investigations provide critical data for optimizing surgical techniques and designing next-generation spinal devices [2, 4, 9, 15].

Disc Degeneration and Molecular Mechanisms

A cluster of articles this month focuses on the molecular pathophysiology of intervertebral disc degeneration and novel therapeutic targets. Qu et al. [6] and Yang et al. [27] identified specific microRNAs (miR-302a-3p and miR-191-5p) that mitigate degeneration and inflammation by regulating key signaling pathways like EPHA2 and EGR1. Wang et al. [10] further explored the protective role of targeting ICAM1 against pyroptosis in nucleus pulposus cells. On the translational side, Ye et al. [16] provided transcriptomic insights into the anti-apoptotic effects of Tuina therapy in rabbit models. Additionally, Ahmadifard et al. [25] investigated the clinical prevalence of Modic changes in low back pain patients, linking imaging findings to degenerative status [6, 10, 16, 25, 27].

Surgical Techniques and Technology

This theme encompasses advancements in surgical approaches, robotics, and intraoperative monitoring. Lewandrowski et al. [8] reviewed the current evidence and practice of endoscopic spine surgery, emphasizing patient selection and the learning curve. Etigunta et al. [12] demonstrated that standardized safety protocols significantly reduce complications in robot-assisted spine surgery. In cervical procedures, Chen et al. [29] compared ultrasonic osteotomes to high-speed burrs for keyhole technology, while Wang et al. [20] showed that force-limited nerve root retractors combined with neurophysiological monitoring reduce L5 radiculitis in PLIF. Cheng et al. [19] also introduced a novel technique for assessing coronal alignment during deformity surgery, reflecting a trend toward precision and safety [8, 12, 19, 20, 29].

Scoliosis Management and Screening

Articles in this group address the spectrum of scoliosis care, from congenital anomalies to adolescent screening. Brooks et al. [22] outlined modern approaches for congenital scoliosis, stressing the importance of growth modulation and associated anomaly screening. Zhang et al. [1] reported on surgical outcomes for congenital upper thoracic scoliosis with long-term follow-up. For adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, Giray et al. [5] evaluated the reliability of AI chatbots in answering patient queries, while Kwan et al. [32] proposed ultrasound curve angle measurement as a superior alternative to spinous process angle for reducing unnecessary radiography in school screenings. Xu et al. [7] further distinguished clinical characteristics of thoracolumbar disc herniation in Scheuermann's disease across age groups [1, 5, 7, 22, 32].

Osteoporosis and Bone Health

Several studies this month focus on bone density, osteoporosis risk factors, and fracture management. Tan et al. [18] developed a bone density-based aging model to predict osteoporosis risk in a community cohort. Qin et al. [21] explored the complex relationship between serum uric acid and bone mineral density in men with type 2 diabetes across different BMI categories. Zhang et al. [23] compared the efficacy of denosumab versus alendronate in preventing vertebral compression fractures in breast cancer patients on aromatase inhibitors. Fan et al. [26] analyzed the impact of vertebral bone quality scores and muscle mass on multiple osteoporotic fractures. Finally, Dong et al. [31] investigated the role of odontoid base hypodensity in type II fracture risk and nonunion [18, 21, 23, 26, 31].

Epidemiology, Outcomes, and Rehabilitation

This theme covers population-level trends, clinical outcomes, and non-surgical interventions. Russo et al. [14] analyzed 22 years of hospitalization data for lumbar disc degeneration in Italy, revealing shifting surgical trends. Rantalaiho et al. [28] compared randomized trial evidence with real-world registry data for lumbar disc herniation surgery, highlighting gaps in applicability. Jamshidian et al. [30] used musculoskeletal modeling to assess how walking speed influences spinal loads. Özalp et al. [11] assessed the benefits of cervical stabilization exercises on balance in forward head posture. Lastly, Li et al. [17] reported on the safety and efficacy of bezeotermin alfa in lumbar interbody fusion, adding to the evidence base for biological augmentation [11, 14, 17, 28, 30].

Articles by Theme

Biomechanics and Implant Mechanics (4)

2. Inoue T, Kumano Y, Sugaya J, et al. Mechanical stress on the rod in posterior spinal fusion with and without rod fracture: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2025. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09377-2

Researchers utilized finite element analysis to compare mechanical stress on rods and intervertebral discs in lumbar fusion models with and without unilateral rod fractures under various loading conditions. The key finding identified specific spinal motion directions that significantly increase stress on the remaining rod and adjacent discs in fractured constructs. Clinically, this highlights the need to limit high-stress movements post-operatively and informs the design of more robust fixation strategies to prevent re-fracture.

4. Jin F, Li J, Liu Z, et al. Biomechanical rational for development of cervical kyphosis deformity: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2025. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09285-5

A finite element analysis was conducted to investigate the biomechanical mechanisms driving the development of cervical kyphosis deformity. The study likely identified specific loading patterns or structural failures that contribute to the loss of cervical lordosis. These insights provide a theoretical basis for developing targeted preventive strategies and surgical corrections to halt or reverse kyphotic progression.

9. Chin KR, Chebrolu S, Sung RD, et al. Comparative in Vitro Analysis of Wear Particles Generated by a Viscoelastic Disc Versus 2 Articulating Total Disc Replacements. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2025. doi:10.2106/jbjs.25.00594

Researchers conducted in vitro wear testing on a viscoelastic total disc replacement (VTDR) device and compared its wear particle characteristics against two established total disc replacements using FDA data. The study found that the VTDR generated significantly fewer submicron wear particles, which are known to trigger inflammatory responses and osteolysis. These findings suggest that viscoelastic designs may offer a safer profile by reducing the risk of implant loosening and failure associated with wear debris.

15. Ribeiro M, Fancello EA, Seggewiß J, et al. Segmental range of motion of vertebral body tethering: an in-vitro analysis of single-tether, double-tether, and hybrid constructs. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2025. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06455-y

An in vitro biomechanical study examined the segmental range of motion (ROM) preserved by single-tether, double-tether, and hybrid vertebral body tethering (VBT) constructs in human spine samples. Results demonstrated that single and double-tether constructs preserved the majority of native ROM in flexion-extension and axial rotation, whereas hybrid constructs significantly restricted lateral bending. The study provides biomechanical evidence that tether configuration critically influences motion preservation, guiding surgical planning for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Disc Degeneration and Molecular Mechanisms (5)

6. Qu W, Liao L, Wang G, et al. miR-302a-3p mitigates intervertebral disc degeneration progression through regulating EPHA2. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2025. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06449-w

Researchers investigated the role of miR-302a-3p in mitigating intervertebral disc degeneration by regulating the EPHA2 pathway. The study demonstrated that upregulation of this microRNA significantly reduced degenerative markers and preserved disc structure in experimental models. This discovery identifies a potential molecular therapeutic target for slowing or reversing disc degeneration in clinical settings.

10. Wang Z, Liu J, Xu H, et al. Targeting ICAM1 through LIF-mediated NF-κB/JAK2-STAT3 crosstalk protects nucleus pulposus from IL-1β-driven pyroptosis to ameliorate intervertebral disc degeneration. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2025. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06494-5

This study investigated the molecular mechanisms by which Leukemia Inhibitory Factor (LIF) protects nucleus pulposus cells from IL-1β-induced pyroptosis via the NF-κB/JAK2-STAT3 pathway targeting ICAM1. The key finding was that LIF-mediated suppression of ICAM1 effectively inhibited cell death and mitigated intervertebral disc degeneration in experimental models. Clinically, this identifies the LIF-ICAM1 axis as a potential therapeutic target for halting disc degeneration progression.

16. Ye J, Zhu J, Kuang K, et al. Transcriptomic insights into the anti-apoptotic effect of Tuina in rabbit model of intervertebral disc degeneration. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2025. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06390-y

This study utilized transcriptomic analysis to explore the anti-apoptotic mechanisms of Tuina therapy in a rabbit model of intervertebral disc degeneration. The research identified specific gene expression changes associated with reduced apoptosis and enhanced cell survival in the nucleus pulposus following Tuina treatment. These findings offer molecular evidence supporting Tuina as a viable non-invasive therapeutic strategy for mitigating disc degeneration.

25. Ahmadifard H, Khatibzade-Nasari N, Baghestani-Koozehgar R, et al. Prevalence of modic changes in patients with low back pain and association with degenerative spinal findings: a retrospective MRI study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2025. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09182-x

This retrospective MRI study evaluated the prevalence of Modic changes in patients with low back pain and their association with other degenerative spinal findings. The research identified a significant correlation between Modic changes and specific degenerative features, suggesting they are not isolated phenomena. Clinically, recognizing these associations may aid in risk stratification and refining diagnostic criteria for chronic low back pain etiologies.

27. Yang Z, Li L, Lin R, et al. miR-191-5p attenuates TNF-α-induced inflammation in nucleus pulposus cells via targeting EGR1. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2025. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06327-5

This study examined the molecular mechanism by which miR-191-5p modulates inflammation in nucleus pulposus cells induced by TNF-α. Researchers demonstrated that miR-191-5p attenuates inflammatory responses by directly targeting and suppressing EGR1 expression. These findings suggest that miR-191-5p could serve as a potential therapeutic target for managing intervertebral disc degeneration and associated inflammatory pain.

Surgical Techniques and Technology (5)

8. Lewandrowski K, Pittman J, Joseph S, et al. Current Practice and Evidence for Endoscopic Spine Surgery. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2025. doi:10.5435/jaaos-d-24-01424

This review examines the current practice, historical development, and evidence base for endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) across various approaches. It highlights that while ESS offers benefits like reduced tissue disruption and faster recovery, successful implementation requires careful patient selection and surgeon expertise to overcome challenges like the learning curve. The article concludes by calling for further research to address existing gaps and optimize ESS integration into standard spine care.

12. Etigunta SK, Walker CT, Gausper A, et al. Decreased Robot-Related Complications Following the Development and Adoption of a Standardized Safety Protocol. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2025. doi:10.2106/jbjs.25.00406

This retrospective cohort study assessed the impact of implementing a standardized institutional safety protocol on complications associated with robot-assisted spine surgery (RASS). The adoption of the protocol, which detailed guidelines for reference-frame placement and trajectory verification, led to a significant reduction in robot-related complications such as pedicle wall breaches. The study concludes that standardized safety protocols are critical for enhancing the safety and reliability of robotic spinal instrumentation.

19. Cheng J, Xu T, Maimaiti M, et al. A novel technique for intraoperative coronal alignment assessment in posterior spinal deformity surgery. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2025. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06364-0

This study introduced a novel intraoperative technique for assessing coronal alignment during posterior spinal deformity surgery. The method likely provides real-time, accurate alignment verification to improve surgical precision and outcomes. The clinical implication is a reduction in postoperative deformity recurrence and improved spinal balance through enhanced intraoperative decision-making.

20. Wang M, Chen Z, Ma J, et al. Force-limited distance-measurable nerve root retractor plus intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring reduces L5 radiculitis in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2025. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06429-0

This retrospective cohort study evaluated the impact of using a force-limited distance-measurable nerve root retractor combined with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring on L5 radiculitis rates during posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The key finding was a significant reduction in 3-month L5 radiculitis incidence in the intervention group compared to conventional retraction. This suggests that combining force-limited retraction with neurophysiological monitoring is an effective strategy to minimize nerve root injury in PLIF procedures.

29. Chen H, Gao G, Liu P, et al. Ultrasonic osteotome versus high-speed burr in channel-assisted cervical key hole technology: a clinical retrospective study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2025. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06402-x

A retrospective clinical study compared the efficacy and safety of ultrasonic osteotomes versus high-speed burrs in channel-assisted cervical keyhole surgery. The results showed that the ultrasonic osteotome offered superior precision and reduced the risk of neural injury during bone removal compared to the high-speed burr. Clinically, this supports the adoption of ultrasonic technology to enhance safety profiles in minimally invasive cervical procedures.

Scoliosis Management and Screening (5)

1. Zhang Q, Xue X, Li K, et al. Surgical treatment of congenital upper thoracic scoliosis: at minimum 2-year follow-up. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2025. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09364-7

This study evaluated the surgical outcomes of congenital upper thoracic scoliosis with a minimum two-year follow-up. The research likely assessed correction rates, complication profiles, and long-term stability specific to this complex deformity. The findings provide critical data to guide surgical planning and counseling for patients with congenital upper thoracic curvature.

5. Giray E, Korkmaz MD, Illeez OG, et al. Let’s chat (GPT) about adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: accuracy and reliability of chat responses to frequently asked questions. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2025. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09315-2

This study assessed the accuracy and reliability of GPT-generated responses to frequently asked questions regarding adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The findings likely revealed significant discrepancies between AI-generated medical advice and established clinical guidelines. The results underscore the risks of relying on chatbots for patient education and emphasize the necessity of professional medical oversight in spinal health information dissemination.

7. Xu Z, Zhou S, Hu Y, et al. Thoracolumbar disc herniation in Scheuermann’s disease: distinct clinical characteristics in elderly and adolescent patients. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2025. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09292-6

This study characterized the distinct clinical features of thoracolumbar disc herniation in patients with Scheuermann's disease across different age groups. The research likely found significant differences in symptom presentation, radiographic findings, and disease progression between adolescents and elderly patients. These findings suggest that management strategies should be tailored specifically to the patient's age and the unique pathophysiology of Scheuermann's-related herniation.

22. Brooks JT, Shalabi M, Johnston C. Modern Approaches and Time-Tested Methods in Managing Congenital Scoliosis in Children. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2025. doi:10.5435/jaaos-d-25-00165

This review outlines modern and traditional approaches for managing congenital scoliosis, emphasizing that curve progression rather than anomaly presence dictates intervention. It highlights the utility of bracing for flexible curves and details surgical options like hemiepiphysiodesis and growing rods for growth modulation. The clinical implication is a nuanced treatment algorithm that prioritizes growth preservation and curve control while avoiding unnecessary early fusion.

32. Kwan C, Yang KG, Hung AL, et al. Ultrasound curve angle is more accurate than spinous process angle and can reduce unnecessary radiography in school scoliosis screening. The Bone & Joint Journal 2025. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.107b11.bjj-2025-0121.r2

This study validated the ultrasound curve angle (UCA) as a more accurate method than the spinous process angle for screening adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and determining referral thresholds. The results indicated that UCA significantly reduces unnecessary radiography while maintaining high accuracy in identifying curves requiring specialist consultation. Implementing UCA in school screening programs could substantially lower radiation exposure and healthcare costs without compromising early detection.

Osteoporosis and Bone Health (5)

18. Tan J, Zhu J, He Y, et al. Unveiling risk factors and predicting osteoporosis through bone density based aging model: a community-based cohort in Guangdong, China. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2025. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09298-0

This community-based cohort study in Guangdong, China, developed a bone density-based aging model to identify risk factors and predict osteoporosis. The research likely established specific correlations between bone density metrics, aging parameters, and osteoporosis prevalence within the local population. Clinically, this model offers a tool for early risk stratification and targeted prevention strategies in community settings.

21. Qin Y, Huang C, Wei W, et al. Influence of serum uric acid on bone mineral density across body mass index categories in men with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2025. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09169-8

This cross-sectional study investigated the association between serum uric acid levels and bone mineral density across different BMI categories in men with type 2 diabetes. The results indicated a significant relationship between uric acid and lumbar bone density, with optimal bone density observed at specific uric acid ranges that varied by BMI. These findings suggest that uric acid-lowering treatments should be tailored based on a patient's BMI to optimize bone health in this population.

23. Zhang Y, Cui W, Hou L. Efficacy of denosumab versus alendronate for aromatase inhibitor-associated osteoporosis in postmenopausal breast cancer patients: a retrospective analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2025. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09280-w

This retrospective analysis compared the efficacy of denosumab versus alendronate in preventing vertebral compression fractures in postmenopausal breast cancer patients with aromatase inhibitor-associated osteoporosis. The study likely found differences in fracture prevention rates or bone mineral density improvements between the two treatments over a 12-month period. These results provide evidence to guide the selection of antiresorptive therapy for breast cancer patients at high risk of osteoporotic fractures.

26. Fan Y, Chen S, Li J, et al. Effects of modified vertebral bone quality score and paravertebral muscle mass on multiple osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2025. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06359-x

A multicenter retrospective cohort study investigated how a modified vertebral bone quality score and paravertebral muscle mass influence the occurrence of multiple osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The findings indicated that lower bone quality and reduced muscle mass are independent predictors for sustaining multiple fractures. These results support integrating bone quality and muscle assessments into clinical protocols to identify high-risk patients for targeted prevention strategies.

31. Dong W, Ma W, Xu N, et al. Odontoid base hypodensity and its role in type II fracture risk and nonunion: a CT study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2025. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09268-6

This CT study investigated the presence of odontoid base hypodensity and its relationship with the risk of type II odontoid fractures and subsequent nonunion. The findings established that hypodensity at the odontoid base is a strong predictor for fracture occurrence and poor healing outcomes. Identifying this radiological sign pre-operatively could assist surgeons in selecting patients who require more aggressive fixation or alternative management strategies.

Epidemiology, Outcomes, and Rehabilitation (5)

11. Özalp M, Talu B, Kayabinar E. Assessment of the effects of cervical stabilization exercises and proprioception training on balance and posture in individuals with forward head posture. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2025. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09259-7

A clinical trial evaluated the impact of cervical stabilization exercises combined with proprioception training on balance and posture in patients with forward head posture. The intervention resulted in significant improvements in postural alignment and balance metrics compared to baseline measurements. These results support the integration of targeted neuromuscular training into rehabilitation protocols for correcting forward head posture.

14. Russo F, Rondinone BM, Papalia GF, et al. Hospitalizations and surgical management of lumbar disc degeneration in Italy: a 22-Year nationwide retrospective study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2025. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09317-0

This nationwide retrospective study analyzed 22 years of hospitalization and surgical trends for lumbar disc degeneration in Italy from 2001 to 2022. The data revealed a declining age- and sex-standardized hospitalization rate for surgical treatment, alongside shifts in interregional patient mobility and length of stay. These trends indicate evolving management strategies and potentially reduced surgical burden for lumbar disc degeneration in the Italian healthcare system.

17. Li W, Luo X, Zhou X, et al. Bezeotermin Alfa (rhBMP-6) Administration in Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery Using a Posterior Approach. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 2025. doi:10.2106/jbjs.25.00424

This Phase-2 randomized, double-blinded trial evaluated the safety and preliminary efficacy of bezeotermin alfa (rhBMP-6) delivered via autologous blood coagulum in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The study found that the treatment was safe with a favorable adverse event profile and demonstrated promising radiographic fusion rates compared to placebo. These findings suggest bezeotermin alfa is a viable osteoinductive agent for enhancing fusion in posterior spinal surgery.

28. Rantalaiho IK, Pernaa KI, Huttunen JM, et al. Applicability of randomized controlled trial evidence on surgery for lumbar disc herniations to clinical reality: a comparison with the nationwide FinSpine registry. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2025. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06401-y

This study compared the patient demographics and clinical outcomes of randomized controlled trials on lumbar disc herniation surgery against real-world data from the nationwide FinSpine registry. The analysis revealed significant discrepancies in patient characteristics and treatment patterns between controlled trials and routine clinical practice. These findings highlight the limitations of applying strict RCT evidence directly to diverse clinical populations and underscore the need for pragmatic trials.

30. Jamshidian A, Rouyin A, Nazemi H, et al. The effect of walking speed on spinal loads and trunk muscle forces using subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling: A database for clinical and modeling applications. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2025. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06408-5

Using subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling, this research quantified the effects of varying walking speeds on spinal loads and trunk muscle forces. The study generated a comprehensive database demonstrating that increased walking speed significantly alters spinal loading patterns and muscle activation. This data provides a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers to optimize rehabilitation protocols and ergonomic interventions for spinal health.

3. Wang E, Wang L, Ming J, et al. Comparative outcomes of ULIF versus OLIF-LP for lumbar spondylolisthesis: an early efficacy study. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2025. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-06441-4

This early efficacy study compared clinical outcomes between ULIF and OLIF-LP approaches for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis. The research likely analyzed metrics such as fusion rates, functional improvement, and complication profiles to determine the relative advantages of each technique. The results offer evidence to help surgeons select the most appropriate minimally invasive approach based on specific patient anatomy and pathology.

13. Wang H, Qu R, Xia T, et al. Artificial vertebral body versus titanium mesh cage for single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF): a propensity score matching analysis of fusion, implant subsidence and clinical outcomes. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2025. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09308-1

A propensity score-matched analysis compared clinical outcomes, fusion rates, and implant subsidence between artificial vertebral bodies and titanium mesh cages in single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. The study found that artificial vertebral bodies offered comparable fusion rates with potentially lower subsidence risks and improved clinical outcomes relative to titanium mesh cages. These findings suggest artificial vertebral bodies may be a superior alternative for specific anterior cervical reconstruction scenarios.

24. Crawford MT, Brismée J, St-Pierre M, et al. Cervical intradiscal pressure responses to end-range supine postures: a cadaveric investigation. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2025. doi:10.1186/s12891-025-09284-6

This cadaveric investigation measured cervical intradiscal pressure responses to end-range supine postures to understand biomechanical stress on the cervical spine. The study likely identified specific postures that significantly increase intradiscal pressure, posing a risk for disc injury. Clinically, these findings inform safer positioning protocols for patients in supine positions to prevent cervical spine complications.

Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0

CC Creative Commons licence
BY Attribution — you must credit the source
NC NonCommercial — not for commercial use

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International


Creative Commons Corporation ("Creative Commons") is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Distribution of Creative Commons public licenses does not create a lawyer-client or other relationship. Creative Commons makes its licenses and related information available on an "as-is" basis. Creative Commons gives no warranties regarding its licenses, any material licensed under their terms and conditions, or any related information. Creative Commons disclaims all liability for damages resulting from their use to the fullest extent possible.

Using Creative Commons Public Licenses

Creative Commons public licenses provide a standard set of terms and conditions that creators and other rights holders may use to share original works of authorship and other material subject to copyright and certain other rights specified in the public license below. The following considerations are for informational purposes only, are not exhaustive, and do not form part of our licenses.

Considerations for licensors: Our public licenses are intended for use by those authorized to give the public permission to use material in ways otherwise restricted by copyright and certain other rights. Our licenses are irrevocable. Licensors should read and understand the terms and conditions of the license they choose before applying it. Licensors should also secure all rights necessary before applying our licenses so that the public can reuse the material as expected. Licensors should clearly mark any material not subject to the license. This includes other CC- licensed material, or material used under an exception or limitation to copyright. More considerations for licensors: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensors

Considerations for the public: By using one of our public licenses, a licensor grants the public permission to use the licensed material under specified terms and conditions. If the licensor's permission is not necessary for any reason--for example, because of any applicable exception or limitation to copyright--then that use is not regulated by the license. Our licenses grant only permissions under copyright and certain other rights that a licensor has authority to grant. Use of the licensed material may still be restricted for other reasons, including because others have copyright or other rights in the material. A licensor may make special requests, such as asking that all changes be marked or described. Although not required by our licenses, you are encouraged to respect those requests where reasonable. More considerations for the public: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensees


Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License

By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License ("Public License"). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from making the Licensed Material available under these terms and conditions.

Section 1 -- Definitions.

a. Adapted Material means material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights that is derived from or based upon the Licensed Material and in which the Licensed Material is translated, altered, arranged, transformed, or otherwise modified in a manner requiring permission under the Copyright and Similar Rights held by the Licensor. For purposes of this Public License, where the Licensed Material is a musical work, performance, or sound recording, Adapted Material is always produced where the Licensed Material is synched in timed relation with a moving image.

b. Adapter's License means the license You apply to Your Copyright and Similar Rights in Your contributions to Adapted Material in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Public License.

c. Copyright and Similar Rights means copyright and/or similar rights closely related to copyright including, without limitation, performance, broadcast, sound recording, and Sui Generis Database Rights, without regard to how the rights are labeled or categorized. For purposes of this Public License, the rights specified in Section 2(b)(1)-(2) are not Copyright and Similar Rights.

d. Effective Technological Measures means those measures that, in the absence of proper authority, may not be circumvented under laws fulfilling obligations under Article 11 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty adopted on December 20, 1996, and/or similar international agreements.

e. Exceptions and Limitations means fair use, fair dealing, and/or any other exception or limitation to Copyright and Similar Rights that applies to Your use of the Licensed Material.

f. Licensed Material means the artistic or literary work, database, or other material to which the Licensor applied this Public License.

g. Licensed Rights means the rights granted to You subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, which are limited to all Copyright and Similar Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material and that the Licensor has authority to license.

h. Licensor means the individual(s) or entity(ies) granting rights under this Public License.

i. NonCommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation. For purposes of this Public License, the exchange of the Licensed Material for other material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights by digital file-sharing or similar means is NonCommercial provided there is no payment of monetary compensation in connection with the exchange.

j. Share means to provide material to the public by any means or process that requires permission under the Licensed Rights, such as reproduction, public display, public performance, distribution, dissemination, communication, or importation, and to make material available to the public including in ways that members of the public may access the material from a place and at a time individually chosen by them.

k. Sui Generis Database Rights means rights other than copyright resulting from Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases, as amended and/or succeeded, as well as other essentially equivalent rights anywhere in the world.

l. You means the individual or entity exercising the Licensed Rights under this Public License. Your has a corresponding meaning.

Section 2 -- Scope.

a. License grant.

1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material to:

a. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part, for NonCommercial purposes only; and

b. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material for NonCommercial purposes only.

2. Exceptions and Limitations. For the avoidance of doubt, where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with its terms and conditions.

3. Term. The term of this Public License is specified in Section 6(a).

4. Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in all media and formats whether now known or hereafter created, and to make technical modifications necessary to do so. The Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or authority to forbid You from making technical modifications necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License, simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a) (4) never produces Adapted Material.

5. Downstream recipients.

a. Offer from the Licensor -- Licensed Material. Every recipient of the Licensed Material automatically receives an offer from the Licensor to exercise the Licensed Rights under the terms and conditions of this Public License.

b. No downstream restrictions. You may not offer or impose any additional or different terms or conditions on, or apply any Effective Technological Measures to, the Licensed Material if doing so restricts exercise of the Licensed Rights by any recipient of the Licensed Material.

6. No endorsement. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be construed as permission to assert or imply that You are, or that Your use of the Licensed Material is, connected with, or sponsored, endorsed, or granted official status by, the Licensor or others designated to receive attribution as provided in Section 3(a)(1)(A)(i).

b. Other rights.

1. Moral rights, such as the right of integrity, are not licensed under this Public License, nor are publicity, privacy, and/or other similar personality rights; however, to the extent possible, the Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any such rights held by the Licensor to the limited extent necessary to allow You to exercise the Licensed Rights, but not otherwise.

2. Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License.

3. To the extent possible, the Licensor waives any right to collect royalties from You for the exercise of the Licensed Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory licensing scheme. In all other cases the Licensor expressly reserves any right to collect such royalties, including when the Licensed Material is used other than for NonCommercial purposes.

Section 3 -- License Conditions.

Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.

a. Attribution.

1. If You Share the Licensed Material (including in modified form), You must:

a. retain the following if it is supplied by the Licensor with the Licensed Material:

i. identification of the creator(s) of the Licensed Material and any others designated to receive attribution, in any reasonable manner requested by the Licensor (including by pseudonym if designated);

ii. a copyright notice;

iii. a notice that refers to this Public License;

iv. a notice that refers to the disclaimer of warranties;

v. a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable;

b. indicate if You modified the Licensed Material and retain an indication of any previous modifications; and

c. indicate the Licensed Material is licensed under this Public License, and include the text of, or the URI or hyperlink to, this Public License.

2. You may satisfy the conditions in Section 3(a)(1) in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share the Licensed Material. For example, it may be reasonable to satisfy the conditions by providing a URI or hyperlink to a resource that includes the required information.

3. If requested by the Licensor, You must remove any of the information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent reasonably practicable.

4. If You Share Adapted Material You produce, the Adapter's License You apply must not prevent recipients of the Adapted Material from complying with this Public License.

Section 4 -- Sui Generis Database Rights.

Where the Licensed Rights include Sui Generis Database Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material:

a. for the avoidance of doubt, Section 2(a)(1) grants You the right to extract, reuse, reproduce, and Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database for NonCommercial purposes only;

b. if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and

c. You must comply with the conditions in Section 3(a) if You Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 4 supplements and does not replace Your obligations under this Public License where the Licensed Rights include other Copyright and Similar Rights.

Section 5 -- Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability.

a. UNLESS OTHERWISE SEPARATELY UNDERTAKEN BY THE LICENSOR, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE LICENSOR OFFERS THE LICENSED MATERIAL AS-IS AND AS-AVAILABLE, AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND CONCERNING THE LICENSED MATERIAL, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHER. THIS INCLUDES, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ABSENCE OF LATENT OR OTHER DEFECTS, ACCURACY, OR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ERRORS, WHETHER OR NOT KNOWN OR DISCOVERABLE. WHERE DISCLAIMERS OF WARRANTIES ARE NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS DISCLAIMER MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

b. TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, IN NO EVENT WILL THE LICENSOR BE LIABLE TO YOU ON ANY LEGAL THEORY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR OTHER LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS PUBLIC LICENSE OR USE OF THE LICENSED MATERIAL, EVEN IF THE LICENSOR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES. WHERE A LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

c. The disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability provided above shall be interpreted in a manner that, to the extent possible, most closely approximates an absolute disclaimer and waiver of all liability.

Section 6 -- Term and Termination.

a. This Public License applies for the term of the Copyright and Similar Rights licensed here. However, if You fail to comply with this Public License, then Your rights under this Public License terminate automatically.

b. Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under Section 6(a), it reinstates:

1. automatically as of the date the violation is cured, provided it is cured within 30 days of Your discovery of the violation; or

2. upon express reinstatement by the Licensor.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 6(b) does not affect any right the Licensor may have to seek remedies for Your violations of this Public License.

c. For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so will not terminate this Public License.

d. Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 survive termination of this Public License.

Section 7 -- Other Terms and Conditions.

a. The Licensor shall not be bound by any additional or different terms or conditions communicated by You unless expressly agreed.

b. Any arrangements, understandings, or agreements regarding the Licensed Material not stated herein are separate from and independent of the terms and conditions of this Public License.

Section 8 -- Interpretation.

a. For the avoidance of doubt, this Public License does not, and shall not be interpreted to, reduce, limit, restrict, or impose conditions on any use of the Licensed Material that could lawfully be made without permission under this Public License.

b. To the extent possible, if any provision of this Public License is deemed unenforceable, it shall be automatically reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable. If the provision cannot be reformed, it shall be severed from this Public License without affecting the enforceability of the remaining terms and conditions.

c. No term or condition of this Public License will be waived and no failure to comply consented to unless expressly agreed to by the Licensor.

d. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be interpreted as a limitation upon, or waiver of, any privileges and immunities that apply to the Licensor or You, including from the legal processes of any jurisdiction or authority.


Creative Commons is not a party to its public licenses. Notwithstanding, Creative Commons may elect to apply one of its public licenses to material it publishes and in those instances will be considered the “Licensor.” The text of the Creative Commons public licenses is dedicated to the public domain under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication. Except for the limited purpose of indicating that material is shared under a Creative Commons public license or as otherwise permitted by the Creative Commons policies published at creativecommons.org/policies, Creative Commons does not authorize the use of the trademark "Creative Commons" or any other trademark or logo of Creative Commons without its prior written consent including, without limitation, in connection with any unauthorized modifications to any of its public licenses or any other arrangements, understandings, or agreements concerning use of licensed material. For the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the public licenses.

Creative Commons may be contacted at creativecommons.org.