Research & Methodology

Principles of orthopaedic clinical research, focusing on experimental design, evidence levels, and the transition from procedural outcomes to patient-centered health metrics.

Overview

Clinical translation of meniscal scaffolds demonstrates promise for improving short- to mid-term clinical outcomes, yet evidence for broader application remains limited by small sample sizes and methodological heterogeneity [1]. The current literature lacks consensus on study purpose originality and clinical design methods, necessitating a shift toward sound patient selection and testing procedures [4, 5]. While prospective randomized therapeutic studies (Level-I or II evidence) represent the gold-standard trial design, their use does not inherently ensure high-quality research or reporting [25].

Accurate and unbiased data collection is vital for integrating clinical research into patient care, yet inconsistent selection of outcomes and measurement devices persists across orthopaedic fields [7, 24]. This variability, coupled with a lack of clear recommendations for reporting outcomes, complicates cross-study comparisons and limits the ability to synthesize evidence in systematic reviews and meta-analyses [32]. Consequently, developing core outcome sets and employing appropriate measures with adequate sample sizes are critical for comparative studies to yield meaningful results [7, 20].

Orthopaedic research fundamentals encompass levels of evidence, study quality tools, clinical practice guidelines, recommendation grades, ethical considerations, and the specific strengths and limitations of orthopaedic registries versus randomized controlled trials [6, 27]. Understanding patient preferences can further inform trial design and recruitment feasibility [29]. However, due to poor to fair methodological quality in existing studies, no specific outcome measures can currently be recommended for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis [22].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Kinematics and Biomechanics

Spinal loading and muscle forces are directly modulated by walking speed [63], while sitting position weight-bearing simultaneously influences facet joint displacement in both translation and rotation during lumbar lateral bending [118]. In this seated posture, the left and right facet joints demonstrate asymmetry during lateral bending movements [118]. Spinal morphology and its correction influence the intensity and location of back pain in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, though balance does not affect pain severity [104], with compensatory strategies potentially occurring at lower spinal levels in these subjects [121]. Hip kinematics are similarly governed by peri-articular soft tissues, where range of motion increases as these tissues are removed [114].

Assessment and Measurement

Clinical examination findings can be evaluated to identify the most common patho-anatomical disorders in the lumbar spine [8]. Currently available wearable devices assess spinal posture with good accuracy in the clinical setting [99], and the ViMove wireless motion sensor system demonstrates clinically acceptable agreement with Vicon motion capture for measuring standing lumbar inclination in sagittal and coronal planes [108]. A range of wearable technologies and biofeedback modalities are utilized to modulate spine motor control [110]. However, various stereophotogrammetric protocols exist to quantify multi-segmental thoracolumbar motion without a standard guideline, leaving approaches limited from a clinical perspective [115].

Patho-Anatomy and Implant Kinematics

The onset of symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis is highly associated with a combination of lumbar spine characteristics, including bony canal and vertebral body dimensions, rather than the presence of a sole variable [112]. Basic science topics in orthopaedics encompass biomechanics, molecular biology, and clinical management principles [107]. In the knee, tibial inlay and transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction yield similar biomechanical results at initial fixation under specific loading conditions [116]. Poor knee function following ACL reconstruction is associated with attenuated landing force and knee flexion moment during running [117]. While a mechanical pivot-shift device can induce pivot-shift-like kinematics by applying highly repeatable three-dimensional loads to cadaver knees [119], investigated knee implant designs failed to replicate the kinematics of a healthy knee [120].

Classification

Early-Onset Scoliosis: The Classification of Early-Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS) serves as a foundation to guide ongoing research efforts and standardize communication in the clinical setting [21].

Platelet-Based Products: A standardized classification system is essential for research and clinical application regarding platelet-based blood-derived products, emphasizing precise documentation of platelet count, activation state, and bioactive molecule interactions [56].

Meniscus Tissue: Validated histological scoring systems are required to provide standardized data collection to allow comparison of results between different research groups for tissue-engineered, ex vivo, and degenerative meniscus [60].

Olecranon Stress Fractures: A classification system for olecranon stress fractures in baseball players was introduced, with operative indications for each type identified as an important next step for future study [67].

Cartilage Repair: The Arthroscopic International Cartilage Repair Society Classification System demonstrates validity through a high correlation with histological assessment of depth [74].

Other Considerations: Rotator Cuff Repair: A randomized trial aims to establish definitive evidence on all-arthroscopic versus mini-open repair of small or moderate-sized rotator cuff tears at an international level [16]. Outcome Measures: While models for converting qDASH and PRWHE scores perform well at the group level, there is more error at the individual level, and external validation with independent datasets is recommended [78]. Phenotyping: The OCTOPuS stratification algorithm is a valid instrument to consistently allocate patients with knee osteoarthritis into subgroups that aligned with hypotheses regarding their phenotypes [86]. A two-stage approach using latent class analysis is preferable to a single-stage approach for identifying subgroups of patients with low back pain, as it yields more distinct and clinically meaningful subgroups [91]. Reporting Standards: The PRISMA for Abstracts checklist provides a consensus-based framework to help authors report all types of systematic reviews in abstracts, ensuring truthful representation and enabling quick assessment of validity and applicability [87]. Statistical Methodology: Statistical primers provide a basic understanding of statistical terminology and principles to enable readers to discern good studies from bad and understand study limitations [71]. Fundamental statistical concepts, terminology, and methodological principles such as randomization, blinding, and hypothesis testing are essential for the design, analysis, and interpretation of orthopaedic research [75]. The scientific method and hypothesis testing emphasize the importance of defining research and null hypotheses, understanding Type I and Type II errors, and conducting power analyses to ensure adequate sample sizes for statistical validity [77]. Common statistical errors such as unnecessary dichotomization, ignoring data clustering, misapplying prediction modelling, and violating logistic regression assumptions can distort scientific findings and impact clinical decision-making [85].

Clinical Presentation

Clinical translation of meniscal scaffolds remains limited by methodological heterogeneity and small sample sizes, though short to mid-term outcomes appear promising [1]. In contrast, comprehensive systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy for lumbar spine patho-anatomical disorders provide a robust evidence base [8]. Such reviews demand clearly stated objectives, reproducible methodologies, systematic searches to identify all eligible studies, validity assessments including risk of bias, and systematic synthesis of findings [9].

Diagnostic accuracy in orthopaedics varies significantly by pathology. S-ResNet-34 simplifies cervical degeneration diagnosis while maintaining accuracy [26], whereas most carpal tunnel syndrome diagnostic test articles fail to report results applicable to actual practice due to bias [38]. For prosthetic joint infection, clinicians must consider variation in diagnostic tests when interpreting microbiology results [40]. Early diagnosis and intervention are critical for improving outcomes in alcohol-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head [30], and modern comprehensive diagnostic criteria have been proposed for rapidly progressive hip osteoarthritis in Southeast Asian populations [31].

Outcome measurement requires rigorous standardization. The Italian version of the High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS-I) is recommended for clinical and research purposes [11], while the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) serves as a primary outcome measure for prospective evaluation and randomized trials [42]. A consensus is needed on patient-reported outcome measures to facilitate homogeneous reporting in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [41]. Future spine muscle auto-segmentation research should focus on developing robust techniques to enhance assessment and planning [35], and validation of beyond-the-scalpel strategies for routine practice is a priority [36].

Interpretation of clinical data requires distinguishing statistical from clinical significance [28]. Understanding outcomes necessitates critical analysis to ensure statistical analyses are properly applied [28]. Comparative clinical studies are ultimately required to best advise surgical treatment in knee and shoulder research, where a focus on outcome measures helps elucidate the relevance of basic science [37]. Most clinical research fails to be useful due to design flaws rather than findings, often lacking problem-based context and pragmatism [39].

Research priorities and reliability also inform presentation. Participants in the 2021 American Hand Therapy Foundation survey identified top concerns for diagnostic and outcomes research and prioritized continued funding involvement [34]. Data exist establishing the effects of longer, clinically pragmatic testing intervals on test-retest reliability for baseline cognitive assessments using ImPACT [33]. While clinical research is challenging, study findings may reflect the truth even if design and execution are uncertain [23].

Investigations

MRI: Short-term clinical and MRI outcomes for second-generation chondrocyte implantation for knee cartilage lesions are promising [17]. A cell-free collagen type I matrix for cartilage defect repair produces good clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results [68]. Quantitative MRI, 3D MRI, and 3T MRI demonstrate greater sensitivity in diagnosing chondral lesions of the knee compared with 2D MRI, 1.5T MRI, and <1.5 Tesla MRI [82]. Newer MRI sequences and artificial intelligence applications may more accurately identify and quantify cartilage lesions, potentially avoiding staged procedures and improving treatment decision-making [80]. A multimodal approach combining several quantitative MRI techniques with morphological and clinical evaluation may be promising for evaluating cartilage repair surgery outcomes [54]. Standardized quantitative MRI accurately detects repair tissue structural differences in the context of multicenter clinical trials for cartilage repair [61]. However, there is only a weak correlation between quantitative imaging data and clinical function after first-generation knee autologous chondrocyte implantation, while qualitative imaging data correlate much better to functional outcomes [66]. MRI findings for a nano-composite multilayered biomaterial for osteochondral regeneration improved over time at 5 years, but no correlation was found between imaging and clinical results [79].

MRI: Metal suppression MRI techniques provide a comprehensive overview of metal artifacts in orthopaedic and spine surgery to facilitate better-informed diagnostic decisions [58]. Performing both quantitative T2 relaxation time and magnetic transfer ratio imaging modalities under the same conditions is helpful for evaluating disc degeneration [65]. MRI-based classifications for meniscal extrusion should integrate dynamic factors and clinical outcomes to inform treatment approaches [64]. An MRI is justified at three months, one year, two years, and five years after third-generation ACI surgery to assess peak maturation, unless clinical symptomatology and individual patient needs dictate otherwise [76]. Few MRI findings show large magnitude associations with symptom outcomes for chronic low back pain or radicular symptoms, even when applying more specific definitions for spine-related symptom outcomes [73]. MRI scans have no effect on the decision to perform arthroscopy or on patient outcomes [84].

Plain radiography: MR-derived simulated CT-like images and simulated radiographs assess clinically relevant shoulder joint features reliably with image quality equivalent to conventional radiographs [72]. Non-ionizing modalities for scoliosis monitoring are not yet viable replacements for routine radiography but have demonstrated validity and accuracy supporting their potential as complementary technologies for screening or supplementary monitoring [81].

Other Considerations: Biologic "chondrofacilitation" using bone marrow aspirate concentrate or mesenchymal stem cells augments microfracture for cartilage lesions with osseous involvement, improving clinical and radiographic outcomes [62]. Validation of a novel genetic marker for risk of degenerative rotator cuff disease surgery in studies with imaging data to confirm diagnoses is an important next step [69]. No clear consensus regarding an optimal protocol, magnitude, or modality for pretensioning and preconditioning of soft tissue graft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament could be identified in the available literature [83].

Treatment

Non-Operative

Nonoperative management is the recommended first-line treatment for most superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) tears, although specific factors may predict failure of conservative care [88]. For pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament injuries, nonoperative management results in high rates of residual knee instability, increased risk of meniscal tears, and comparatively low rates of return to sports [98]. In the context of rotator cuff pathology, the increasing incidence of repairs is questionable given the lack of convincing data on the superiority of operative treatment over non-operative management for all rotator cuff tears [70]. Conversely, operative treatment for full-thickness rotator cuff tears resulted in greater improvement in Constant scores and significantly decreased pain scores compared to nonoperative management [93]. For knee osteoarthritis, evidence does not support the effectiveness of arthroscopic surgery compared to conservative treatments [95]. Low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a viable conservative option to potentially reduce socioeconomic impact and improve quality of life in patients with instrumented, infected, and fragility non-unions [89]. A trial of conservative management with land-based exercise is recommended prior to surgical intervention for lumbar spinal-canal stenosis due to its slowly progressive nature and potential surgical complications [100]. Additionally, a more conservative approach in monitoring scoliotic curves is supported by 3D markerless asymmetry analysis, which reduces radiograph usage while decreasing the risk of unmeasured curve progression [97]. Conservative treatment may also be the preferred option for acromial and scapular spine fractures following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty until superior surgical methods are developed [90]. Nonoperative treatment for isolated anterolateral bundle reconstructions of the posterior cruciate ligament should not be extended more than 1 year from injury [92].

Operative

Indications: Hip arthroscopy is statistically superior to conservative treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI) in both long-term and short-term effects [96]. Inactivated autograft should be applied with caution in the treatment of primary malignant musculoskeletal tumors, with patients selected using strict surgical indications [52].

Surgical Approach / Technique: A randomized trial aims to establish definitive evidence on the comparison between all-arthroscopic and mini-open repair of small or moderate-sized rotator cuff tears at an international level [16]. The document regarding labral repair, biceps tenodesis, and diagnostic arthroscopy for SLAP lesions is a study protocol for a randomized placebo-controlled trial and does not report results or conclusions regarding efficacy [51].

Pain Management: A multimodal nonopioid pain protocol provided equivalent pain control and patient outcomes following primary meniscus surgery while having an equivalent side effect profile compared to opioid control [94].

Other Considerations: Clinical translation of meniscal scaffolds is limited by differences in study methodology and small sample sizes, though short to mid-term clinical outcomes appear promising [1]. Longer-term studies are necessary to determine the efficacy of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair over time [3]. Additional studies are needed to determine the long-term efficacy of collagen scaffolds for the regeneration of meniscal cartilage [45]. Future research on autologous bone grafting combined with autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee should focus on high-quality comparative studies to better guide treatment choices [49]. Larger and long-term controlled trials are needed to support the clinical effectiveness of autologous bone marrow stem cell implantation for osteonecrosis of the knee in sickle cell disease [2]. Additional blinded randomized control trials and clinical effectiveness trials with rigorous standards are needed to establish the efficacy of cell-based therapy for osteonecrosis of the femoral head [48].

Complications

Other Considerations: Evidence regarding long-term outcomes and study methodology reveals significant gaps across multiple orthopaedic domains. Larger and long-term controlled trials are needed to support the clinical effectiveness of autologous bone marrow stem cell implantation for osteonecrosis of the knee in sickle cell disease [2]. Longer-term studies are necessary to determine the efficacy of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair over time [3] and to evaluate if outcomes of Latarjet versus distal tibia allograft for anterior shoulder instability repair are maintained [14]. Limited evidence exists on long-term functional outcomes and failure rates beyond the 10-year mark for hip preservation procedures [10]. Further prospective studies and long-term randomized clinical data are necessary for a comprehensive understanding of the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of outpatient versus inpatient joint arthroplasty [15]. Longer follow-up data regarding the efficacy and safety of intra-articular steroid injections for hip osteoarthritis, as well as potentially influential factors, remain unclear and need further confirmation [47].

Methodological rigor is critical to interpreting complication and efficacy data. Systematic reviews require a clearly stated set of objectives, an explicit reproducible methodology, a systematic search to identify all eligible studies, an assessment of validity such as risk of bias, and systematic presentation and synthesis of findings [9]. Previous trials on Tai Chi for knee osteoarthritis had limitations regarding standardized outcome measures and long-term follow-up that subsequent studies aimed to overcome [12]. Selection bias can cause serious misinterpretation of study results in randomized controlled trials on arthroscopic treatment of patients with knee osteoarthritis [105]. Propensity-score adjustments are not a substitute for an adequately powered, well-controlled, prospective, randomized study [109]. Enrolment of low back pain patients in clinical studies is likely to provoke responses reflecting nonspecific effects of seeking and receiving care, independent of study design [18]. Critical gaps exist between laboratory and clinical investigations for early arthritis therapies, necessitating prospective long-term observational studies to understand the natural history of early post-traumatic osteoarthritis [19].

Specific implant and procedural findings highlight the need for continued investigation. An intraoperative load sensor did not improve early postoperative results of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with varus deformities [13], and a long-term follow-up study with a large cohort is required to further evaluate the use of intraoperative load sensors in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty [13]. The efficacy of risedronate against bone resorption remains disputed in medium or long-term follow-up due to declining trends and potential safety challenges [55], requiring future larger clinical trials with longer duration focusing on clinically relevant endpoints to resolve these disputes [55]. Journal editors should set standards for publication to avoid misleading readers with short-term results, including strict criteria regarding long-term follow-up and comparison with standard techniques [53]. Review articles and database mining studies are important for rare clinical syndromes where original trials are unfeasible, but the increasing trend raises concerns about the future availability of original articles [103].

Revision surgery outcomes are heavily influenced by prior history. Prior revision history predicts subsequent failure in revision total knee arthroplasty [113], suggesting that early referral to centers with appropriate expertise and infrastructure may optimize outcomes due to this predictive nature [113]. Regarding hip arthroscopy, the nature of complications changed with experience, but no significant variation in the incidence was observed over a 9-year period [106].

Recovery

Light activity (weeks): Evidence regarding specific timelines for light activity, such as desk work or driving, is not explicitly quantified in the provided literature for these procedures. While short-term and intermediate-term results for hip preservation are favorable, there is limited evidence on long-term functional outcomes and failure rates beyond the 10-year mark [10]. Similarly, no clinically discernible differences in active range of motion at 1-year follow-up exist between patients assigned to early or delayed motion protocols in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with biceps rerouting [125].

Full activity (months): The timeline for returning to full activity varies by intervention and remains a subject of ongoing investigation. Longer-term studies are necessary to determine the efficacy of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair over time [3], and further prospective studies and long-term randomized clinical data are necessary for a more comprehensive understanding of the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of outpatient versus inpatient joint arthroplasty [15]. For cartilage lesions in the knee, short-term clinical and MRI outcomes for second-generation characterized chondrocyte implantation are promising [17], while autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis provides better outcomes compared to autologous minced cartilage implantation in the repair of knee chondral defects, with follow-up between 2 and 4 years [59].

Complete recovery / outcome plateau (months): Long-term stability of outcomes is a critical but often unverified metric across multiple orthopaedic procedures. Larger and long-term controlled trials are needed to support the clinical effectiveness of autologous bone marrow stem cell implantation for osteonecrosis of the knee in sickle cell disease [2]. Longer-term studies are needed to determine if the outcomes of Latarjet versus distal tibia allograft for anterior shoulder instability repair are maintained over time [14]. A large-scale long-term follow-up study is necessary to elucidate findings regarding chronological age and adverse postoperative outcomes after high tibial osteotomy [57]. Nonoperative management of degenerative medial meniscus posterior root tears results in poor outcomes at a minimum 10-year follow-up [122]. Additionally, an intraoperative load sensor did not improve early postoperative results of posterior-stabilized TKA for osteoarthritis with varus deformities, and a long-term follow-up study with a large cohort is required [13].

Rehabilitation protocol: Specific rehabilitation protocols, including PT phasing and immobilisation duration, are not detailed in the provided evidence. However, the evolution of tissue treated with autologous PRP showed a positive tendency over time, while the placebo group was negative in the repair of full-thickness articular defects in rabbits [126]. Prospective, long-term observational studies are needed to understand the natural history of early post-traumatic osteoarthritis before formulating and studying interventions [19].

Functional milestones: Validated outcome measures and trajectories are frequently cited as areas requiring standardization or further validation. A study on Tai Chi for knee osteoarthritis aims to overcome limitations of previous trials by using standardized outcome measures and long-term follow-up [12]. Reproducible results that hold up over time characterize the mark of a successful surgical procedure, but long-term studies are difficult to design due to the challenge of forecasting future questions [123]. Psychological factors may play a role in determining who responds to long-term follow-up surveys, although timing of incentives does not [124].

Other Considerations: Several methodological and patient-specific factors influence the interpretation of recovery data. Enrolment of low back pain patients in clinical studies is likely to provoke responses that reflect the nonspecific effects of seeking and receiving care, independent of the study design [18].

Key Evidence

• [L2] The evidence for clinical translation is limited by differences in study methodology and small sample sizes, but is promising in terms of improving clinical outcomes in the short to mid-term. (10.3390/ijms20030632)
• [L4] Larger and long-term controlled trials are needed to support its clinical effectiveness. (10.1186/s12891-018-2067-x)
• [L4] Longer-term studies are necessary to determine the efficacy over time. (10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.018)
• [L2] The author recommends focusing on the originality of the study purpose and the clinical design method to improve future research. (10.1177/1753193415583624)
• [L2] As the committee continues to adjust these guidelines, they should encourage future studies with sound clinical design, patient selection, and testing procedures. (10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.044)
• [L2] Developing a core outcome set would allow for more effective comparison across studies in systematic reviews. (10.1371/journal.pone.0187865)
• [L1] This is the first comprehensive systematic review of diagnostic accuracy studies that evaluate clinical examination findings for their ability to identify the most common patho-anatomical disorders in the lumbar spine. (10.1186/s12891-017-1549-6)
• [L5] A systematic review can be done with a clearly stated set of objectives with an explicit, reproducible methodology; a systematic search that attempts to identify all studies that would meet the eligibility criteria; an assessment of the validity of the findings of the included studies, such as through the assessment of risk of bias; and systematic presentation and synthesis of the characteristics and findings of the included studies. (10.1177/1753193415573151)
• [L5] While short-term and intermediate-term results are favorable, there is limited evidence on long-term functional outcomes and failure rates beyond the 10-year mark. (10.1007/s00167-023-07409-9)
• [L4] Its use is recommended for clinical and research purposes. (10.1186/s13018-018-0782-5)
• [L2] The study aims to overcome limitations of previous trials by using standardized outcome measures and long-term follow-up. (10.1186/1471-2474-9-108)
• [L2] A long-term followup study with a large cohort is required. (10.1007/s00167-018-5314-7)
• [L3] Longer-term studies are needed to determine if these results are maintained over time. (10.1177/0363546517744203)
• [L1] However, it is clear that further prospective studies and long-term randomized clinical data are necessary for a more comprehensive understanding. (10.1186/s12891-025-08510-5)
• [L2] The trial aims to establish definitive evidence on this question at an international level. (10.1186/1471-2474-7-25)
• [L4] The short-term clinical and MRI outcome are promising. (10.1007/s00167-011-1759-7)
• [L1] In addition to a shared 'natural history', enrolment of LBP patients in clinical studies is likely to provoke responses that reflect the nonspecific effects of seeking and receiving care, independent of the study design. (10.1186/1471-2474-15-68)
• [L5] The conference identified critical gaps between laboratory and clinical investigations, emphasizing the need for prospective, long-term observational studies to understand the natural history of early post-traumatic osteoarthritis before formulating and studying interventions. (10.1177/0363546511411654)
• [L1] Comparative studies need to use appropriate outcome measures with adequate sample sizes to provide meaningful results. (10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.029)
• [L4] This classification system will serve as a foundation to guide ongoing research efforts and standardize communication in the clinical setting. (10.2106/jbjs.m.00253)
• [L1] Based on the literature, no recommendations to use any of the outcome measures can yet be made due to the poor to fair methodological quality of the studies investigating measurement properties. (10.1177/1753193413488301)
• [L5] Clinical research is challenging, and the observed findings of the referenced study may turn out to reflect the truth, but based on this study's design and execution, we do not know. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.12.009)
• [L5] Accurate and unbiased data collection is vital for utilizing clinical research and outcome studies in patient care, and this study should give all equipoise in evaluating published clinical studies and utilization of the results in clinical practice. (10.2106/jbjs.n.00890)
• [L4] The use of the gold-standard trial design, the prospective randomized therapeutic study (Level-I or II evidence), does not ensure quality research or reporting. (10.2106/jbjs.f.00858)
• [L4] The findings offer a new choice for patients by simplifying the diagnostic process while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. (10.1186/s12891-025-09273-9)
• [L3] Orthopaedic registry studies differ from randomized controlled trials in many ways and offer certain advantages; the strengths and limitations of registry cohort studies and RCTs must be understood to properly evaluate the literature. (10.2106/jbjs.n.01332)
• [L5] Statistical significance is different than clinical significance, and understanding clinical outcomes requires critical analysis of medical research literature to ensure that statistical analyses have been properly applied and interpreted. (10.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.013)
• [L4] However, understanding their preferences can inform future trial designs and feasibility assessments with regard to recruitment rates. (10.1302/0301-620x.106b12.bjj-2023-1266.r2)
• [L5] Early diagnosis and intervention are critical to improving outcomes. (10.1186/s13018-025-06138-8)
• [L4] The authors propose modern comprehensive diagnostic criteria based on existing literature and current findings. (10.1186/s42836-021-00107-2)
• [L2] The lack of clear recommendations for reporting outcomes complicates comparisons between studies and limits the ability to synthesise evidence in systematic reviews and meta‐analyses. (10.1002/ksa.70311)
• [L4] These data help establish the effects of longer, clinically pragmatic testing intervals on test-retest reliability. (10.1177/0363546509343805)
• [L4] Participants identified top concerns for diagnostic and outcomes research and prioritized continuing Foundation involvement in funding clinical research. (10.1016/j.jht.2024.11.007)
• [L1] Future research should focus on developing more robust and accurate techniques to enhance clinical assessment and treatment planning. (10.1186/s12891-024-07777-4)
• [L5] Future research should focus on validating these strategies and integrating them into routine clinical practice. (10.1302/0301-620x.106b8.bjj-2024-0291)
• [L5] A focus on measures of outcomes may help readers elucidate the meaning and relevance of basic science studies, though comparative clinical studies are ultimately required to best advise surgical treatment of pathology. (10.1016/j.arthro.2010.06.007)
• [L1] Consequently, most articles on diagnostic tests for CTS are unlikely to report results that are applicable to actual clinical practice. (10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.018)
• [L5] Most clinical research fails to be useful not because of its findings but because of its design, as many studies do not satisfy key features such as problem base, context placement, and pragmatism. (10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049)
• [L4] However, variation in diagnostic tests should also be considered in interpreting and comparing clinical microbiology results. (10.3389/fmicb.2022.906989)
• [L5] There is a need for a consensus on which patient-reported outcome measures should be used to facilitate homogeneous reporting of outcomes. (10.1177/0363546511402660)
• [L4] It can be used as a primary outcome measure for prospective patient evaluation and randomized clinical trials. (10.1016/j.arthro.2012.03.013)
• [L1] However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with large sample sizes and longterm interventions are needed to validate the efficacy of HBE due to limitations in the methodology and consistency of indicator outcomes in the included RCTs. (10.1186/s12891-024-07585-w)
• [L5] Meta-analyses are valuable for synthesizing data to estimate treatment effects, but they must be performed with rigorous methodology to ensure validity, minimize bias, and avoid misleading conclusions. (10.1007/s00167-022-07304-9)
• [L4] Additional studies are needed to determine long-term efficacy. (10.2106/00004623-199712000-00002)
• [L1] The analysis of available RCTs revealed poor methodologic quality with relevant bias, limiting conclusions on efficacy compared with other treatments. (10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.043)
• [L1] The longer follow-up data of efficacy and safety and potentially influential factors are still unclear and needed further confirmation. (10.1155/2020/6320154)
• [L2] Additional blinded randomized control trials and clinical effectiveness trials with rigorous standards are needed to establish the efficacy of these therapies. (10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.049)
• [L4] However, future research should focus on high-quality comparative studies to better guide treatment choices. (10.1002/ksa.12342)
• [L2] By using cluster-randomization, as well as process- and effect evaluation based on objective measures, the study will contribute to the evidence base of a promising intervention approach. (10.1186/s12891-016-1339-6)
• [L1] This document is a study protocol for a randomised placebo-controlled trial; it does not report results or conclusions regarding efficacy. (10.1186/1471-2474-11-228)
• [L4] Thus, we should apply this method with caution and choose the patients with strict surgical indication. (10.1186/s13018-015-0324-3)
• [L5] The author proposes that journal editors set standards for publication to avoid misleading readers with short-term results, suggesting that fewer scientific journals and congresses might be better if strict criteria regarding long-term follow-up and comparison with standard techniques were applied. (10.1007/s001670050074)
• [L4] A multimodal approach combining several quantitative MRI techniques in addition to morphological and clinical evaluation might be promising. (10.1155/2014/840170)
• [Letter] The efficacy of risedronate against bone resorption remains disputed in medium or long-term follow-up due to declining trends and potential safety challenges, necessitating future larger clinical trials with longer duration focusing on clinically relevant endpoints. (10.1186/s13018-022-03118-0)
• [L5] A standardized classification system is essential for research and clinical application, emphasizing precise documentation of products' characteristics, including platelet count, activation state and bioactive molecule interactions. (10.1002/ksa.12655)
• [Commentary] A large-scale long-term follow-up study is necessary to elucidate these findings. (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.042)
• [L5] This review provides a comprehensive overview of different metal artifacts in orthopaedic MRI and factors affecting their magnitude, discussing commonly applied techniques and recent technological advances to facilitate better-informed diagnostic decisions. (10.5435/jaaos-d-24-01057)
• [L3] These are mid-term outcomes, with follow-up between 2 and 4 years. (10.1002/ksa.12387)
• [L3] Validated scores are required to provide a standardized data collection to allow the comparison of results of different research groups. (10.1007/s00167-012-2142-z)
• [L1] Standardized quantitative MRI was able to accurately detect repair tissue structural differences in the context of a multicenter clinical trial. (10.1016/j.arthro.2013.07.169)
• [Commentary] Both treatment options improve clinical and radiographic outcomes. (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.056)
• [L4] These data provide a useful reference for future research in spinal biomechanics and musculoskeletal modeling. (10.1186/s13018-025-06408-5)
• [L4] Results also support integrating dynamic factors and clinical outcomes in MRI-based classifications to inform treatment approaches. (10.1002/ksa.12183)
• [L5] Performing both imaging modalities under the same conditions would be helpful in the evaluation of disc degeneration. (10.1186/s12891-015-0610-6)
• [L4] There is only weak correlation of quantitative imaging data and clinical function, while qualitative imaging data are much better correlated to functional outcomes. (10.1177/0363546514536682)
• [L5] The study was intended to introduce a classification system for olecranon stress fractures, with operative indications for each type identified as an important next step for future study. (10.1177/0363546514541043)
• [L4] The study reveals that the new method produces both good clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results. (10.1007/s00167-011-1777-5)
• [L3] Validation of this finding in studies with imaging data to confirm diagnoses will be an important next step. (10.2106/jbjs.20.01474)
• [L3] This progress can be questioned, since there are not convincing data of the superiority of the operative treatment over non-operative management in all rotator cuff tears. (10.1186/s12891-015-0639-6)
• [L5] The purpose of this article is to provide a basic understanding of statistical terminology and principles so that the reader may become a better consumer of medical research, enabling them to discern good studies from bad and understand study limitations. (10.1177/036354659602400324)
• [L4] In this proof-of-concept study, clinically relevant features of the shoulder joint were assessed reliably using MR-derived CT-like images and simulated radiographs with an image quality equivalent to conventional radiographs. (10.1186/s12891-022-05076-4)
• [L2] Even when applying more specific definitions for spine-related symptom outcomes, few MRI findings showed large magnitude associations with symptom outcomes. (10.1186/1471-2474-15-152)
• [L4] A high correlation with histological assessment of depth provides evidence of validity for this classification system. (10.1016/j.arthro.2016.12.012)
• [L1] An MRI is justified at three months, one year, two years and five years after surgery, unless the clinical symptomatology and individual patient needs dictate otherwise. (10.1007/s00167-020-06339-0)
• [L5] The article outlines the scientific method and hypothesis testing, emphasizing the importance of defining research and null hypotheses, understanding Type I and Type II errors, and conducting power analyses to ensure adequate sample sizes for statistical validity. (10.1177/036354659602400525)
• [L4] While the models perform well at the group level, there is more error at the individual level, and external validation with independent datasets is recommended. (10.1177/17531934251331033)
• [L4] Although the MRI findings improved over time, some abnormalities persisted, but no correlation was found between the imaging and clinical results. (10.1177/0363546513505434)
• [L5] Newer MRI sequences and artificial intelligence applications may more accurately identify and quantify cartilage lesions, potentially avoiding staged procedures and improving treatment decision-making. (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.03.009)
• [L1] Although these non-ionizing modalities are not yet viable replacements for routine radiography, their demonstrated validity and accuracy supports their potential as complementary technologies, particularly for screening or supplementary monitoring of scoliosis. (10.1186/s12891-025-09034-8)
• [L1] Further analysis showed that quantitative MRI, 3D MRI, and 3T MRI demonstrate greater sensitivity compared with 2D MRI, 1.5T MRI, and <1.5 Tesla MRI. (10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.035)
• [L2] No clear consensus regarding an optimal protocol, magnitude, or modality could be identified within the currently available relevant literature. (10.1007/s00167-015-3530-y)
• [L1] We found no effect of MRI on the decision to perform arthroscopy or patient outcome. (10.1016/j.arthro.2007.05.020)
• [L5] The article demonstrates that common statistical errors, such as unnecessary dichotomization, ignoring data clustering, misapplying prediction modelling, and violating logistic regression assumptions, can distort scientific findings and impact clinical decision-making. (10.1177/17531934251330978)
• [L3] The stratification algorithm is a valid instrument to consistently allocate patients into subgroups that aligned with hypotheses regarding their phenotypes. (10.1186/s12891-021-04485-1)
• [L5] The PRISMA for Abstracts checklist provides a consensus-based framework to help authors report all types of systematic reviews in abstracts, ensuring truthful representation and enabling quick assessment of validity and applicability. (10.1371/journal.pmed.1001419)
• [L4] Although nonoperative treatment should be considered the first line of treatment for most SLAP tears, there are some factors that may be associated with failure of conservative treatment. (10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.022)
• [L4] LIPUS treatment should be considered as a conservative non-surgical treatment option to potentially reduce the socioeconomic impact and improve the quality of life of these unfortunate patients. (10.1186/s12891-021-04322-5)
• [L3] Conservative treatment may be the better option until better surgical methods are developed. (10.1016/j.jse.2022.03.005)
• [L4] The study concludes that a two-stage approach using latent class analysis is preferable to a single-stage approach for identifying subgroups of patients with low back pain, as it yields more distinct and clinically meaningful subgroups. (10.1186/s12891-017-1411-x)
• [L4] Nonoperative treatment should not be extended more than 1 year from injury. (10.1177/0363546509333479)
• [L1] Operative treatment resulted in greater improvement in Constant scores and significantly decreased pain scores compared to nonoperative management. (10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.032)
• [L1] This study found that a multimodal nonopioid pain protocol provided equivalent pain control and patient outcomes following primary meniscus surgery while having an equivalent side effect profile. (10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.043)
• [L1] The evidence does not support the effectiveness of arthroscopic knee surgery compared to conservative treatments in knee OA. (10.1186/s12891-024-07813-3)
• [L1] In our meta-analysis, hip arthroscopy is statistically superior to conservative treatment in both long-term and short-term effects. (10.1186/s13018-022-03187-1)
• [L3] These results lead to a more conservative approach in monitoring of scoliotic curves in clinical applications; smaller number of radiographs would be saved, however the risk of having non-measured curves with progression would be decreased. (10.1186/s12891-018-2303-4)
• [L4] Nonoperative management resulted in high rates of residual knee instability, increased risk of meniscal tears, and comparatively low rates of return to sports. (10.1177/0363546521990817)
• [L1] Our findings suggest that currently available devices are capable of assessing spinal posture with good accuracy in the clinical setting. (10.1186/s12891-019-2430-6)
• [L1] However, given the condition's slowly progressive nature and the potential for known surgical complications, it is recommended that a trial of conservative management with land based exercise be considered prior to consideration of surgical intervention. (10.1186/1471-2474-13-30)
• [L5] While review articles and database mining studies are important for rare clinical syndromes where original trials are unfeasible, the increasing trend raises concerns about the future availability of original articles needed to conduct such reviews. (10.1016/j.jse.2023.01.012)
• [L3] Although balance did not influence pain severity, spinal morphology and its correction appear to have influenced the intensity and location of back pain. (10.1186/s12891-020-03462-4)
• [L5] Selection bias can cause serious misinterpretation of study results, and the hypothesis of a clinical study affords opportunity for the investigators to articulate their own personal bias. (10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.004)
• [L4] The nature of complications changed with experience, but no significant variation in the incidence was observed over the 9-year period of experience with hip arthroscopy. (10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.021)
• [L3] We found a clinically acceptable level of agreement between these two methods for measuring standing lumbar inclination motion in these two cardinal movement planes. (10.1186/s12891-017-1489-1)
• [L5] The results of the referenced studies make sense in theory if exogenous microbes are excluded and endogenous microbes are eliminated, but propensity-score adjustments are not a substitute for an adequately powered, well-controlled, prospective, randomized study. (10.2106/jbjs.19.00457)
• [L1] The review identifies a range of wearable technologies and biofeedback modalities used to modulate spine motor control, highlighting the need for standardized reporting and further research to establish clinical efficacy. (10.1186/s12891-024-07867-3)
• [L3] Our results indicate that combination of lumbar spine characteristics such as bony canal and vertebral body dimensions rather than the presence of a sole variable is highly associated with symptomatic DLSS onset. (10.1186/s12891-023-06330-z)
• [L3] Because prior revision history predicts subsequent failure, early referral to centers with appropriate expertise and infrastructure may optimize outcomes. (10.1016/j.arth.2025.09.038)
• [L5] Hip kinematics was also influenced by peri-articular soft tissues; specifically range of motion increases with increasing removal of those tissues. (10.1007/s00167-012-2091-6)
• [L1] The literature offers various stereophotogrammetric protocols to quantify multi-segmental motion of the thoracolumbar spine without a standard guideline, and approaches remain limited from a clinical point of view. (10.1186/s12891-022-05925-2)
• [L5] The study suggests that either technique may be performed with similar biomechanical results at initial fixation under these loading conditions. (10.1177/0363546503261717)
• [L3] These findings provide greater understanding of the relationship between knee biomechanics during running and clinical assessments of knee function. (10.1007/s00167-017-4810-5)
• [L5] In sitting position, weight-bearing has certain influence on the displacement of facet joints during lumbar lateral bending movement, and this influence occurs simultaneously in translation and rotation; the left and right facet joints are not symmetrical during lumbar lateral bending movement. (10.1186/s13018-024-04533-1)
• [L5] The presented device induces pivot-shiftlike kinematics by applying highly repeatable three-dimensional loads to cadaver knees. (10.1007/s00167-015-3775-5)
• [L5] The knee implant designs investigated did not replicate the kinematics of a healthy knee. (10.2106/jbjs.h.00817)
• [L4] The results indicate that compensatory strategies are potentially seen at lower levels of the spine. (10.1186/1471-2474-6-14)
• [L4] This study provides a valuable update on the natural history and long-term prognosis of nonoperatively treated MMPRTs. (10.1177/03635465231185132)
• [L5] Reproducible results that hold up over time characterize the mark of a successful surgical procedure, but long-term studies are difficult to design due to the challenge of forecasting future questions; however, the future holds promise for developing better long-term studies with higher levels of evidence as more information is prospectively collected. (10.1016/j.arthro.2015.12.027)
• [L2] Psychological factors may play a role in determining who responds to long-term follow-up surveys although timing of incentives does not. (10.1371/journal.pone.0079179)
• [L1] This study's findings reveal no clinically discernible differences in active range of motion at 1-year follow-up between patients assigned to either early or delayed motion protocols. (10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.029)
• [L5] The evolution of tissue treated with autologous PRP showed a positive tendency over time, while the placebo group was negative. (10.1007/s00167-012-2141-0)

See Also

• Disc Degeneration
• Surgical Complications
• Conservative Treatment
• Pain Management
• Deformities

References

[1] Are the Biological and Biomechanical Properties of Meniscal Scaffolds Reflected in Clinical Practice? A Systematic Review of the Literature. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20030632

[2] Use of autologous bone marrow stem cell implantation for osteonecrosis of the knee in sickle cell disease: a preliminary report. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2067-x

[3] Prospective analysis of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Subgroup analysis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.11.018

[4] Clinical research in hand surgery. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1753193415583624

[5] The Quality of Diagnostic Studies in Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Can We Do Better?. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.044

[6] Chapter 1 Orthopaedic Research. 2020.

[7] Inconsistent selection of outcomes and measurement devices found in shoulder arthroplasty research: An analysis of studies on ClinicalTrials.gov. PLOS ONE. 2017. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187865

[8] Clinical classification in low back pain: best-evidence diagnostic rules based on systematic reviews. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1549-6

[9] About systematic reviews. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2015. DOI: 10.1177/1753193415573151

[10] The growth of hip preservation as a speciality. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07409-9

[11] Development of the Italian version of the High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS-I) following hip and knee total arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0782-5

[12] Tai Chi for treating knee osteoarthritis: Designing a long-term follow up randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-108

[13] An intraoperative load sensor did not improve the early postoperative results of posterior‐stabilized TKA for osteoarthritis with varus deformities. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5314-7

[14] Outcomes of Latarjet Versus Distal Tibia Allograft for Anterior Shoulder Instability Repair: A Matched Cohort Analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0363546517744203

[15] Safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of outpatient versus inpatient joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08510-5

[16] All-arthroscopic versus mini-open repair of small or moderate-sized rotator cuff tears: A protocol for a randomized trial [NCT00128076]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2006. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-25

[17] Short‐term outcome of the second generation characterized chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of cartilage lesions in the knee. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1759-7

[18] The clinical course of low back pain: a meta-analysis comparing outcomes in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2014. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-68

[19] Closing the Gap Between Bench and Bedside Research for Early Arthritis Therapies (EARTH). The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2011. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511411654

[20] Systematic review of shoulder arthroplasty outcomes: what sample size is meaningful?. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.029

[21] Development and Initial Validation of the Classification of Early-Onset Scoliosis (C-EOS). Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.m.00253

[22] Outcome measures and their measurement properties for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a systematic literature review. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2013. DOI: 10.1177/1753193413488301

[23] Clinical Research is Challenging: Commentary on “Factors Related to Distal Interphalangeal Joint Extension Loss After Extension Block Pinning of Mallet Finger Fractures”. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.12.009

[24] Apples, Oranges, and National Databases. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.n.00890

[25] Quality of Prospective Controlled Randomized Trials. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2007. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.f.00858

[26] S-ResNet-34: small sample-ResNet-34 for predicting cervical degeneration in x-ray image data. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-09273-9

[27] Understanding Orthopaedic Registry Studies. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2016. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.n.01332

[28] Research Pearls: The Significance of Statistics and Perils of Pooling. Arthroscopy. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.03.013

[29] Willingness to participate in placebo-controlled surgical trials of the knee. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2024. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b12.bjj-2023-1266.r2

[30] The bibliometric and visualization analysis of alcohol-induced osteonecrosis of the femoral head: research trends and future directions (1998–2024). Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-06138-8

[31] Rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of hip: establishing and validating diagnostic criteria in the Southeast Asian population. Arthroplasty. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s42836-021-00107-2

[32] Outcome measures used for evaluating the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A scoping review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2026. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.70311

[33] Long-Term Test-Retest Reliability of Baseline Cognitive Assessments Using ImPACT. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009. DOI: 10.1177/0363546509343805

[34] The 2021 American Hand Therapy Foundation research priorities survey. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2024.11.007

[35] Spine muscle auto segmentation techniques in MRI imaging: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07777-4

[36] Beyond the scalpel. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2024. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b8.bjj-2024-0291

[37] Making Sense of Basic Science in Knee and Shoulder Research. Arthroscopy. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.06.007

[38] Effects of Bias on the Results of Diagnostic Studies of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.02.018

[39] Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful. PLOS Medicine. 2016. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049

[40] The State of Microbiology Diagnostic of Prosthetic Joint Infection in Europe: An In-Depth Survey Among Clinical Microbiologists. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2022. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.906989

[41] Anatomic Single- and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Part 2. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2011. DOI: 10.1177/0363546511402660

[42] The Development and Validation of a Self‐Administered Quality‐of‐Life Outcome Measure for Young, Active Patients With Symptomatic Hip Disease: The International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT‐33). Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.03.013

[43] Efficacy of home-based exercise in the treatment of pain and disability at the hip and knee in patients with osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07585-w

[44] A guide to appropriately planning and conducting meta‐analyses—Part 1: indications, assumptions and understanding risk of bias. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2022. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07304-9

[45] Regeneration of Meniscal Cartilage with Use of a Collagen Scaffold. Analysis of Preliminary Data. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery*. 1997. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199712000-00002

[46] Oxygen–Ozone Therapy for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Arthroscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2019.05.043

[47] Intra‐Articular Steroid Injection for Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. BioMed Research International. 2020. DOI: 10.1155/2020/6320154

[48] Evidence for the Use of Cell-Based Therapy for the Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review of the Literature. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.049

[49] Autologous bone grafting in combination with autologous chondrocyte implantation yields favourable outcomes in the treatment of osteochondral defects of the knee: A systematic literature review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12342

[50] Participatory organizational intervention for improved use of assistive devices for patient transfer: study protocol for a single-blinded cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1339-6

[51] Efficacy of labral repair, biceps tenodesis, and diagnostic arthroscopy for SLAP Lesions of the shoulder: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2010. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-228

[52] The long-term outcomes following the use of inactivated autograft in the treatment of primary malignant musculoskeletal tumor. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2015. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-015-0324-3

[53] Will we never learn?. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 1998. DOI: 10.1007/s001670050074

[54] Cartilage Repair Surgery: Outcome Evaluation by Using Noninvasive Cartilage Biomarkers Based on Quantitative MRI Techniques?. BioMed Research International. 2014. DOI: 10.1155/2014/840170

[55] Comment on “The efficiency of risedronate in reducing bone resorption after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials at a minimum of 6 months’ follow-up”. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03118-0

[56] PRP or not PRP: Is the debate surrounding platelets‐based blood‐derived products evolving?. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12655

[57] Editorial Commentary: Chronological Age Is Not Associated With Adverse Postoperative Outcomes After High Tibial Osteotomy: Contradiction of Another Dogma From the Past. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.042

[58] Metal Suppression Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2025. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-24-01057

[59] Autologous matrix‐induced chondrogenesis provides better outcomes in comparison to autologous minced cartilage implantation in the repair of knee chondral defects. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12387

[60] Histological scoring systems for tissue‐engineered, ex vivo and degenerative meniscus. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2142-z

[61] Paper #164: Quantitative 3D MRI as a Valid Endpoint for Randomized Clinical Trials in Cartilage Repair and its Correlation with Repair Tissue Collagen Architecture. Arthroscopy. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.07.169

[62] Editorial Commentary: When Treating Cartilage Lesions With Osseous Involvement, Biologic “Chondrofacilitation” Using Either Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate or Mesenchymal Stem Cells Augments Microfracture. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.056

[63] The effect of walking speed on spinal loads and trunk muscle forces using subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling: A database for clinical and modeling applications. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-06408-5

[64] Meniscal extrusion consensus statement: A collaborative survey within the Meniscus International Network (MenIN) Study Group. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12183

[65] Quantitative T2 relaxation time and magnetic transfer ratio predict endplate biochemical content of intervertebral disc degeneration in a canine model. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2015. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0610-6

[66] Long-term T2 and Qualitative MRI Morphology After First-Generation Knee Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0363546514536682

[67] Classification of Olecranon Stress Fractures in Baseball Players: Letter to the Editor. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0363546514541043

[68] Cell‐free collagen type I matrix for repair of cartilage defects—clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1777-5

[69] Identification of a Novel Genetic Marker for Risk of Degenerative Rotator Cuff Disease Surgery in the UK Biobank. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2021. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.20.01474

[70] Increasing incidence of rotator cuff repairs—A nationwide registry study in Finland. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2015. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0639-6

[71] A Statistics Primer. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1996. DOI: 10.1177/036354659602400324

[72] Evaluation of MR-derived simulated CT-like images and simulated radiographs compared to conventional radiography in patients with shoulder pain: a proof-of-concept study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05076-4

[73] Longitudinal associations between incident lumbar spine MRI findings and chronic low back pain or radicular symptoms: retrospective analysis of data from the longitudinal assessment of imaging and disability of the back (LAIDBACK). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2014. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-152

[74] Reliability and Validity of the Arthroscopic International Cartilage Repair Society Classification System: Correlation With Histological Assessment of Depth. Arthroscopy. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.12.012

[75] Chapter 66 Statistics: Practical Applications for Orthopaedics. 2019.

[76] Typical MRI‐pattern suggests peak maturation of the ACI graft 2 years after third‐generation ACI: a systematic review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06339-0

[77] A Statistics Primer. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1996. DOI: 10.1177/036354659602400525

[78] Creating a common scale for the conversion of qDASH and PRWHE scores. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17531934251331033

[79] Clinical Results and MRI Evolution of a Nano-Composite Multilayered Biomaterial for Osteochondral Regeneration at 5 Years. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2013. DOI: 10.1177/0363546513505434

[80] Editorial Commentary: Evaluation for Cartilage Lesions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Continues to Improve: Artificial Intelligence Applications May Result in Higher Sensitivity and Specificity. Arthroscopy. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.03.009

[81] Exploring radiation-free scoliosis monitoring: systematic review and meta-analysis of non-ionizing methods. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2025. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-09034-8

[82] Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Had Greater Sensitivity in Diagnosing Chondral Lesions of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis. Arthroscopy. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.01.035

[83] Lack of consensus regarding pretensioning and preconditioning protocols for soft tissue graft reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3530-y

[84] The Effect of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans on Knee Arthroscopy: Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.05.020

[85] Avoiding pitfalls in conducting hand surgery research – potential consequences of common errors in statistical analyses. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17531934251330978

[86] Construct validity of the OCTOPuS stratification algorithm for allocating patients with knee osteoarthritis into subgroups. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04485-1

[87] PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts. PLoS Medicine. 2013. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001419

[88] Return to play following nonsurgical management of superior labrum anterior-posterior tears: a systematic review. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.022

[89] Low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) use for the management of instrumented, infected, and fragility non-unions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of healing proportions. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2021. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04322-5

[90] Clinical results of conservative versus operative treatment of acromial and scapular spine fractures following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.03.005

[91] Identifying subgroups of patients using latent class analysis: should we use a single-stage or a two-stage approach? A methodological study using a cohort of patients with low back pain. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1411-x

[92] Long-term Results of Isolated Anterolateral Bundle Reconstructions of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2009. DOI: 10.1177/0363546509333479

[93] Operative versus nonoperative treatment for the management of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.032

[94] Multimodal Nonopioid Pain Protocol Provides Equivalent Pain Versus Opioid Control Following Meniscus Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Arthroscopy. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.02.043

[95] Arthroscopic surgery is not superior to conservative treatment in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07813-3

[96] Conservative therapy versus arthroscopic surgery of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03187-1

[97] 3D Markerless asymmetry analysis in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2303-4

[98] Early Operative Versus Delayed Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment of Pediatric and Adolescent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/0363546521990817

[99] The role of wearables in spinal posture analysis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2430-6

[100] The effectiveness of land based exercise compared to decompressive surgery in the management of lumbar spinal-canal stenosis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2012. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-30

[103] Review articles and database studies. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.01.012

[104] Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evaluating perioperative back pain through a simultaneous morphological and biomechanical approach. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2020. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03462-4

[105] Selection Bias Results in Misinterpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials on Arthroscopic Treatment of Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis. Arthroscopy. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.004

[106] Do Complications in Hip Arthroscopy Change With Experience?. Arthroscopy. 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.021

[107] Chapter 153 Basic Science. 2019.

[108] Clinically acceptable agreement between the ViMove wireless motion sensor system and the Vicon motion capture system when measuring lumbar region inclination motion in the sagittal and coronal planes. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2017. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1489-1

[109] Are We All Still Listerians or Not?. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.19.00457

[110] Wearable technology mediated biofeedback to modulate spine motor control: a scoping review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07867-3

[112] Predictive factors for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a model obtained from a machine learning algorithm technique. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2023. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06330-z

[113] Ensuring Access to High Quality Care in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Referral Patterns and Clinical Outcomes at a Tertiary Care Center. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.09.038

[114] In vitro analysis of peri‐articular soft tissues passive constraining effect on hip kinematics and joint stability. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2091-6

[115] Stereophotogrammetric approaches to multi-segmental kinematics of the thoracolumbar spine: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2022. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05925-2

[116] Biomechanical Comparison of Tibial Inlay versus Transtibial Techniques for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2004. DOI: 10.1177/0363546503261717

[117] Poor knee function after ACL reconstruction is associated with attenuated landing force and knee flexion moment during running. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4810-5

[118] Effect of different loads on facet joint motion during lumbar lateral bending in sitting position. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2024. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04533-1

[119] A mechanical pivot-shift device for continuously applying defined loads to cadaveric knees. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3775-5

[120] The Influence of Contemporary Knee Design on High Flexion: A Kinematic Comparison with the Normal Knee. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 2008. DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.h.00817

[121] Assessment of the paraspinal muscles of subjects presenting an idiopathic scoliosis: an EMG pilot study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2005. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-14

[122] Nonoperative Management of Degenerative Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: Poor Outcomes at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/03635465231185132

[123] Editorial Commentary: Planting a Tree to Create the Shade—Performing Quality Long‐term Studies Requires Forethought. Arthroscopy. 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.12.027

[124] Predictors of Response Rates to a Long Term Follow-Up Mail out Survey. PLoS ONE. 2013. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079179

[125] Does timing influence rehabilitation outcomes in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with biceps rerouting? a prospective randomized study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.01.029

[126] Effect of autologous platelet‐rich plasma on the repair of full‐thickness articular defects in rabbits. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2141-0