Skip to content

Total shoulder arthroplasty

Surgeon-side topic for total shoulder arthroplasty. Backed by 412 articles from the corpus, retrieved via combined MeSH + title-text matching.

Overview

Total shoulder arthroplasty encompasses anatomic and reverse designs, with the latter experiencing a rapid rise in use driven by expanded indications, improved surgical technique, implant design, and surgeon experience [14]. While reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is increasingly utilized in patients younger than 60 years of age, this demographic experiences significantly higher rates of 90-day surgical complications compared to older patients [48]. For patients with primary osteoarthritis, an intact rotator cuff, and no glenoid deformity, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty does not appear to offer functional benefits over anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty [7]. However, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty yields outcomes comparable to anatomic procedures with very low reoperation rates [14]. Return rates for total shoulder arthroplasty are slightly higher than those reported for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty [9].

Surgical implant type, indication, patient comorbidities, and hospital factors contribute to differential surgical cost for total shoulder arthroplasty [6]. Shoulder replacement remains a viable treatment option regardless of patient tobacco usage at short-term follow-up, although conclusions may vary depending on the replacement type used [5]. Outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty is a safe and effective option for appropriately selected patients, offering reduced costs, improved access, and high patient satisfaction compared to inpatient procedures [17]. Patients with a history of anterior shoulder instability undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty can expect continued improvement in function compared with preoperative values at mid-term follow-up [4].

Long-term management and prognostication require specific surveillance and outcome monitoring. Consensus recommendations for long-term follow-up and surveillance of elective primary shoulder arthroplasty were developed using a real-time Delphi technique [1]. The outcome of revision shoulder arthroplasty can be predicted based on the indication for the procedure [3]. Early outcomes after first reverse total shoulder arthroplasty better prognosticate contralateral success compared with early outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty [10]. Success after first anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty does not reliably predict contralateral success until 1 year [10].

Anatomy & Pathophysiology

Osseous and Glenohumeral Mechanics

Shoulder arthroplasty to address sequelae of anterior instability arthropathy and stabilization procedures is challenging due to distorted anatomy and severe glenohumeral joint pathology [2]. Preoperative planning using supine CT may inaccurately pose bones, with consequent effects on the surgical plan, resultant shoulder biomechanics, and clinical outcomes [35]. All movement planes show significant differences in simulated ROM when comparing preoperative planning protocols with and without adjustment for posture [41]. Adjusting patient-specific scapula posture significantly impacts predicted impingement-free motion amplitudes and ROM in rTSA [45].

Kinematics and Scapulothoracic Contribution

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) restores forward elevation primarily via compensatory scapulothoracic motion and deltoid-driven neuromuscular strategies rather than normalization of glenohumeral mechanics [32]. The scapulothoracic (ST) contribution to overall shoulder movement is significantly increased in patients with an rTSA compared with a healthy shoulder [37]. There is an increased contribution of scapulothoracic rotation relative to glenohumeral motion throughout arm elevation following TSA compared to asymptomatic shoulders [42]. Postoperative changes in scapular kinematics following rTSA positively impact shoulder function and patient-reported outcome measures [36]. Significant changes from preoperative to postoperative conditions were not demonstrated for other kinematic parameters beyond those already noted in rTSA [46].

Biomechanical Load and Range of Motion

Isolated humeral distalization in rTSA causes dramatic increases in the muscle forces required to perform scapular-plane abduction, with joint reaction forces increasing correspondingly [39]. A general decrease in the degree of rotational range of motion (ROM) is observed with higher glenohumeral abduction angles for both elliptical and spherical head designs [40]. The study quantifies biomechanical shifts regarding varus-valgus alignment of humeral short stems in rTSA but does not explicitly state a final clinical conclusion regarding the functional impact of these misalignments [44].

Soft Tissue and Stabilization

Clavicle hook plate fixation changes scapular kinematics and scapulohumeral rhythm [49]. Joint stability and abduction capability are compromised by more extensive rotator cuff tears, and subscapularis repair might be essential to enhancing biomechanical effectiveness in lateralized rTSA [52].

Classification

Consensus Guidelines: Long-term follow-up and surveillance of elective primary shoulder arthroplasty are guided by consensus recommendations derived from a real-time Delphi technique [1].

Indication-Based Complexity: Shoulder arthroplasty for the sequelae of anterior instability arthropathy and prior stabilization procedures is classified as challenging due to distorted anatomy and severe glenohumeral joint pathology [2]. The outcome of revision shoulder arthroplasty is predicted by the specific indication for the procedure [3].

Risk Stratification: A predictive model based on specific patient characteristics has good properties for identifying patients likely to have a better outcome from shoulder arthroplasty [8].

Other Considerations: Implant Selection: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty does not offer functional benefits over anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff in patients with no glenoid deformity [7]. Substantial variation exists in implant selection and surgical technique for reverse shoulder replacement, despite it being the predominant form of shoulder arthroplasty in the United Kingdom [15]. Shoulder replacement is a viable treatment option regardless of patient tobacco usage at short-term follow-up, although viability may vary depending on the replacement type used [5].

Revision Criteria: The decision to revise a total shoulder arthroplasty requires rigorous assessment regarding five key factors: infection, instability, wear, loosening, and rotator cuff status [16]. Retention of osseointegrated prosthetic implants during surgical management of chronic infections following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty results in better shoulder function than conventional GS-type management [20].

Preoperative Assessment: Preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography bone density measures provide objective bone quality classifications for stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty [23]. Health care resource utilization data from the 2 years prior to total shoulder arthroplasty provides a baseline for understanding trends in nonarthroplasty treatment of shoulder pathology before replacement [28].

Economic and System Factors: Differential surgical cost for total shoulder arthroplasty is contributed to by surgical implant type, indication, patient comorbidities, and hospital factors [6]. Prolonged length of stay following shoulder arthroplasty is independently associated with patient-level variables (age, comorbidity burden, ASA score, and trauma indication) and system-level variables (weekend surgery and surgeon volume) [51].

Literature Trends: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is a growing field where studies with higher levels of evidence may overtake older, highly cited articles in the future [29].

Clinical Presentation

Preoperative Assessment and Patient Selection

The decision to proceed with total shoulder arthroplasty requires rigorous preoperative evaluation, particularly in complex cases. Revision surgery to address sequelae of anterior instability arthropathy or prior stabilization procedures is challenging due to distorted anatomy and severe glenohumeral joint pathology [2]. The outcome of such revision procedures can be predicted based on the specific indication for the procedure [3]. For patients with a history of anterior shoulder instability undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty, continued improvement in function compared with preoperative values is expected at mid-term follow-up [4].

Patient-specific factors significantly influence surgical planning and outcomes. A model based on specific patient characteristics demonstrates good predictive properties for identifying patients likely to have a better outcome from shoulder arthroplasty [8]. Current comorbidity indices, however, inadequately identify patients who experience early adverse outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty [33]. There are minimal gender differences in shoulder arthroplasty outcomes, with both genders achieving similar long-term results in pain relief and function [22]. Shoulder replacement remains a viable treatment option regardless of patient tobacco usage at short-term follow-up, though conclusions may vary depending on the replacement type used [5].

Risk Stratification and Functional Expectations

Risk assessment must account for age and activity demands. Nonagenarians are at an increased risk of medical complications, longer hospital stays, periprosthetic fractures, and death following total shoulder arthroplasty [13]. Return-to-play rates for total shoulder arthroplasty are slightly higher than those reported for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty [9]. However, activities entailing greater shoulder demands may hinder a patient's ability to return to outdoorsman sports after primary total shoulder arthroplasty [19]. Two PROMIS measures, physical function and pain interference, can be used to estimate high-impact chronic pain for patients receiving total shoulder arthroplasty [21].

Glenoid Morphology and Implant Considerations

Glenoid exposure is a difficult but key step in total shoulder arthroplasty that conditions correct component positioning [11]. Good functional results can be achieved in cases with B1 and B2 glenoid morphology after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty using a metal back glenoid component [24]. Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using an all-polyethylene cemented glenoid component shows a high prevalence of radiographic signs associated with rotator cuff failure and glenoid wear at minimum 10-year follow-up, but this does not translate to a high complication rate or inferior outcome [18].

Postoperative Surveillance and Revision Indications

Long-term follow-up and surveillance guidelines for elective primary shoulder arthroplasty are established via consensus using a real-time Delphi technique [1]. Most patients undergoing shoulder stabilization procedures regain fundamental strength and range of motion [12]. The decision to revise a total shoulder arthroplasty requires a rigorous assessment regarding infection, instability, wear, loosening, and rotator cuff status [16]. Surgical implant type, indication, patient comorbidities, and hospital factors contribute to differential surgical cost for total shoulder arthroplasty [6].

Investigations

Plain radiography: Radiographic measurements are generally valid for evaluating postoperative parameters in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty [58]. However, routine radiographs are overused and typically do not lead to any changes in asymptomatic patients in the first 2 years after total shoulder arthroplasty [72].

CT: Preoperative shoulder CT may be associated with a small but quantifiable projected cancer risk, which is most pronounced in younger women [62]. Preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography bone density measures provide objective classifications of bone quality for stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty [23]. Navigation increases the accuracy of glenoid component implantation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in shoulders with severe glenoid wear [69].

Ultrasound: Ultrasound imaging is an efficient, easy to use, and inexpensive tool for the diagnosis and management of the painful shoulder, with advantages over other modalities for evaluating the postoperative shoulder [67].

Tomosynthesis: Tomosynthesis may be a new and effective modality for evaluating glenoid loosening [68].

Other Considerations: Long-term follow-up and surveillance of elective primary shoulder arthroplasty should be guided by consensus recommendations derived from a real-time Delphi technique [1].

Treatment

Non-Operative

Data on health care resource utilization in the 2 years prior to total shoulder arthroplasty provide a baseline for understanding current trends regarding nonarthroplasty treatment of shoulder pathology [28].

Operative

Indications: Shoulder arthroplasty addresses sequelae of anterior instability arthropathy and prior stabilization procedures, though this is challenging due to distorted anatomy and severe glenohumeral joint pathology [2]. The outcome of revision shoulder arthroplasty can be predicted based on the indication for the procedure [3]. A predictive model based on specific patient characteristics can identify patients likely to have a better outcome from shoulder arthroplasty [8]. Patients with a history of anterior shoulder instability undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty can expect continued improvement in function compared with preoperative values at mid-term follow-up [4]. Shoulder replacement is a viable treatment option regardless of patient tobacco usage at short-term follow-up, although outcomes may vary depending on the replacement type used [5]. Nonagenarians are at an increased risk of medical complications, longer hospital stays, periprosthetic fractures, and death following total shoulder arthroplasty [13]. There are minimal gender differences in shoulder arthroplasty outcomes, with both genders achieving similar long-term results in pain relief and function [22].

Surgical Approach / Technique: Glenoid exposure is a difficult but key step in total shoulder arthroplasty that conditions correct component positioning [11]. Strict operative technique during reverse shoulder arthroplasty for recent proximal humerus fractures is crucial to obtain reliable outcomes, as inadequate tuberosity repair or inappropriate humeral stem position are associated with poorer outcomes [34].

Implant Selection: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty does not offer functional benefits over anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis, an intact rotator cuff, and no glenoid deformity [7]. The rapid rise in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) use is driven by expanded indications, improvements in surgical technique, implant design, and surgeon experience, resulting in outcomes comparable to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty with very low reoperation rates [14]. Substantial variation exists in implant selection and surgical technique for reverse shoulder replacement despite it being the predominant form of shoulder arthroplasty in the United Kingdom [15]. Radiographic loosening over time remains a concern for all-polyethylene fluted central peg glenoid components implanted using an off-label, uncemented technique, potentially jeopardizing long-lasting fixation [57]. Functional improvement was obtained after reimplantation of a reverse total shoulder prosthesis for staged revision with antibiotic spacers, but was not seen after hemiarthroplasty and cement spacer [56].

Alignment / Balancing Strategy: Acute recovery after total shoulder arthroplasty can be assessed via maximum elevation, while chronic recovery can be assessed via time spent above 90 degrees of elevation [26].

Pain Management: Intraoperative tranexamic acid (TXA) does not improve range of motion or pain after total shoulder arthroplasty [64].

Adjuncts: Robotic-assisted arthroplasty is available for shoulder arthroplasty with some limitations, and surgeons should become familiar with its nature, potential benefits, disadvantages, and surgical techniques [31]. Shoulder metallosis is an infrequent but significant potential complication in patients who have undergone shoulder arthroplasty with retained metallic suture anchors [59].

Setting of Care: Outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty is a safe and effective option for appropriately selected patients, offering reduced costs, improved access, and high patient satisfaction compared to inpatient procedures [17].

Revision: Two-stage revision, resection arthroplasty, and permanent spacer implantation show comparable infection eradication rates for the treatment of septic shoulder prosthesis [30].

Other Considerations: Long-term follow-up and surveillance guidelines for elective primary shoulder arthroplasty have been established using a real-time Delphi technique [1]. Surgical implant type, indication, patient comorbidities, and hospital factors contribute to differential surgical cost for total shoulder arthroplasty [6]. Two Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures, physical function and pain interference, can be used to estimate high-impact chronic pain for patients receiving total shoulder arthroplasty [21]. Most patients undergoing shoulder stabilization procedures regain fundamental strength and range of motion, though objective measures for assessing readiness to return to sport are not standardized [12]. Rehabilitation guidelines for reverse total shoulder replacement aim to achieve optimal pain relief and maximize functional outcomes while mitigating surgical risks [27]. Newer rehabilitation regimes permit immediate shoulder mobilization following reverse shoulder arthroplasty but may not be applied to every patient [61].

Complications

Infection (PJI): Perioperative testosterone use is associated with a significantly higher risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary total shoulder arthroplasty, without differences in other major complications including revision rates, dislocation, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, and stiffness [83]. Prescription testosterone use is associated with a higher risk of infection-related and all-cause reoperations after primary total shoulder arthroplasty in male patients [82]. Non-cefazolin antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with increased rates of acute infectious, medical, and surgical complications following primary total shoulder arthroplasty [80]. For septic shoulder prosthesis, two-stage revision, resection arthroplasty, and permanent spacer implant show comparable infection eradication rates [30].

Instability: Instability is a challenging complication with high failure rates after revision procedures for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty [77]. The cement-within-cement technique in revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is associated with a low rate of humeral component loosening but higher rates of complications and re-revision surgery over time due to aseptic glenoid component loosening and instability [55]. The Latarjet procedure is associated with the highest odds of future total shoulder arthroplasty [78].

Periprosthetic fracture: Nonagenarians are at increased risk of medical complications, longer hospital stays, periprosthetic fractures, and death following total shoulder arthroplasty [13]. Patients from areas of high social deprivation have increased rates of humeral fracture and dislocation following primary total shoulder arthroplasty [79].

Other Considerations: Shoulder arthroplasty for instability arthropathy and sequelae of stabilization procedures is challenging due to distorted anatomy and severe glenohumeral joint pathology [2]. Revision shoulder arthroplasty outcomes can be predicted based on the indication for the procedure [3]. Shoulder replacement is a viable treatment option regardless of patient tobacco usage at short-term follow-up, though outcomes may vary by replacement type [5]. Revision shoulder arthroplasty has high direct costs driven by implant-related expenses and a high cost per improvement in patient-reported outcomes compared to primary arthroplasty [25]. The cement-within-cement technique in revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is associated with a low rate of humeral component loosening but higher rates of complications and re-revision surgery over time due to aseptic glenoid component loosening and instability [55]. Elevated preoperative international normalized ratio (INR) is associated with an increased risk of postoperative complications following total shoulder arthroplasty [71]. Revision rates and patient-reported outcomes are similar between cemented and uncemented humeral stems in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fracture [73]. Brachial artery pseudoaneurysm is an uncommon but possible complication after shoulder arthroplasty [81].

Recovery

Light activity (weeks): Acute recovery metrics are defined by maximum elevation [26]. Patients typically resume desk work, driving, and light activities of daily living within the early postoperative period, though specific week ranges are not detailed in the current evidence base.

Full activity (months): Return to sport is highly frequent and can be expected after total shoulder arthroplasty [43]. Return to sports after reverse shoulder arthroplasty is also possible and highly frequent [65]. Patients can be counseled that they can expect to successfully return to sporting and recreational activities following surgical reconstruction of their shoulder [70]. However, activities entailing greater shoulder demands may hinder a patient's ability to return to those specific activities after arthroplasty [19]. Among patients who perceive their shoulder as normal, anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) patients outperform reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) patients with better motion and greater ability to return to work, return to sport, and perform higher demand activities without difficulty [50].

Complete recovery / outcome plateau (months): Chronic recovery is assessed via time spent above 90 degrees of elevation [26]. The plateau of maximum recovery following rotator cuff repair occurred at 1 year with high satisfaction rates at all time points [60]. Patients with a history of anterior shoulder instability undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty can expect continued improvement in function compared with preoperative values at mid-term follow-up [4]. Success after the first anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty does not reliably predict contralateral success until 1 year postoperatively [10].

Rehabilitation protocol: Rehabilitation guidelines for reverse total shoulder replacement aim to achieve optimal pain relief and maximize functional outcomes while mitigating surgical risks [27]. Early, active rehabilitation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is safe and effective, and may have early clinical benefits over a conservative, delayed mobilisation programme [38]. A progression of exercises for patients after reverse shoulder arthroplasty can be based on increased muscle activity [47].

Functional milestones: Long-term follow-up and surveillance guidelines for elective primary shoulder arthroplasty are anticipated to contribute to future clinical guidelines [1]. Return rates for total shoulder arthroplasty are slightly higher than those reported for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty [9]. Direct costs of revision shoulder arthroplasty are primarily driven by implant-related costs, and the cost per improvement in patient-reported outcomes is high compared to primary arthroplasty [25].

Key Evidence

  • [L4] We anticipate that these recommendations, in addition to the limited applicable published evidence available, can contribute to guidelines on long-term follow-up and surveillance of elective primary shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1177/17585732251356963)
  • [L1] Shoulder arthroplasty to address the sequelae of instability arthropathy and stabilization procedures can be a challenging procedure as a consequence of the distorted anatomy and severe glenohumeral joint pathology. (10.1007/s00402-020-03400-y)
  • [L3] At mid-term follow-up, patients with a history of anterior shoulder instability undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty can expect continued improvement in function compared with preoperative values. (10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.005)
  • [L3] Overall, these findings indicate that shoulder replacement in general is a viable treatment option regardless of patient tobacco usage at short-term follow-up, but this conclusion may vary depending on the replacement type used. (10.1177/17585732221102393)
  • [L3] Surgical implant type, indication, patient comorbidities, and hospital factors contribute to differential surgical cost for total shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.055)
  • [L3] Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty does not appear to offer functional benefits over anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in this population. (10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.038)
  • [L2] A model based on these characteristics had good predictive properties for identifying patients likely to have a better outcome from shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1007/s11999-016-4990-1)
  • [L4] The literature reports that rates of return for total shoulder arthroplasty are slightly higher than those reported for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty. (10.1016/j.csm.2018.06.002)
  • [L4] In contrast, success after first anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty does not reliably predict contralateral success until 1 year. (10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.007)
  • [Paper] Glenoid exposure is a difficult but key step in total shoulder arthroplasty that conditions correct component positioning. (10.1016/j.otsr.2017.10.008)
  • [L1] Most patients undergoing shoulder stabilization procedures regained fundamental strength and range of motion. (10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100978)
  • [L3] Nonagenarians are at an increased risk of medical complications, longer hospital stays, periprosthetic fractures, and death following total shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1177/17585732241269174)
  • [L5] The rapid rise in RTSA use is a product of expanded indications, improvements in surgical technique, implant design, and surgeon experience, resulting in outcomes comparable to anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (ATSA) with very low reoperation rates. (10.1016/j.jse.2023.08.009)
  • [L4] Substantial variation exists in implant selection and surgical technique despite reverse shoulder replacement being the predominant form of shoulder arthroplasty in the United Kingdom. (10.1177/17585732261437401)
  • [Paper] The decision to revise a total shoulder arthroplasty requires a rigorous assessment to answer five key questions regarding infection, instability, wear, loosening, and rotator cuff status. (10.1016/j.otsr.2012.11.010)
  • [L5] Outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty is a safe and effective option for appropriately selected patients, offering reduced costs, improved access, and high patient satisfaction compared to inpatient procedures. (10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.003)
  • [L4] Although a high prevalence of radiographic signs associated with rotator cuff failure and glenoid wear were reported, this did not translate to a high complication rate or inferior outcome. (10.1016/j.jse.2025.03.036)
  • [L4] Activities entailing greater shoulder demands may hinder a patient's ability to return after arthroplasty. (10.1177/23259671251326076)
  • [Paper] This technique resulted in better shoulder function than a conventional GS-type management. (10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102906)
  • [L4] Two PROMIS measures commonly administered in orthopedic surgery settings, physical function and pain interference, can be used to estimate high-impact chronic pain for patients receiving total shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1016/j.jseint.2024.07.005)
  • [L3] This study shows minimal gender differences in shoulder arthroplasty outcomes, with both genders achieving similar longterm results in pain relief and function. (10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.035)
  • [L4] Preoperative 3-dimensional CT bone density measures provide objective classifications of bone quality for stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.005)
  • [Paper] Good functional results can be achieved in cases with a B1 and a B2 glenoid after anatomic shoulder arthroplasty using the described metal back glenoid. (10.1007/s00402-020-03454-y)
  • [L3] Direct costs of revision shoulder arthroplasty are primarily driven by implant-related costs, and the cost per improvement in patient-reported outcomes is high compared to primary arthroplasty. (10.1177/17585732251404026)
  • [L4] This study demonstrates that acute and chronic recovery after total shoulder arthroplasty can be assessed via maximum elevation and time above 90 degrees, respectively. (10.1016/j.jse.2019.01.003)
  • [L5] The review outlines rehabilitation guidelines developed to manage patients who have undergone reverse total shoulder replacement, aiming to achieve optimal pain relief and maximize functional outcomes while mitigating risks associated with the surgery. (10.1111/j.1758-5740.2011.00138.x)
  • [L3] These data provide a baseline for understanding current trends regarding nonarthroplasty treatment of shoulder pathology before shoulder replacement. (10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.033)
  • [Paper] As reverse total shoulder arthroplasty continues to grow over the next decade, studies with higher levels-of-evidence may overtake articles included in this analysis. (10.1177/17585732231155123)
  • [L4] This retrospective analysis shows comparable infection eradication rates after two-stage revision, resection arthroplasty, or permanent spacer implant for the treatment of septic shoulder prosthesis. (10.1007/s00264-011-1467-4)
  • [L5] Robotic-assisted arthroplasty is now available for shoulder arthroplasty with some limitations, and shoulder surgeons should become familiar with the nature of this technology, potential benefits and disadvantages, and the surgical techniques employed. (10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.08.013)
  • [L1] rTSA restores forward elevation primarily via compensatory scapulothoracic motion and deltoid-driven neuromuscular strategies rather than normalization of glenohumeral mechanics. (10.1016/j.jse.2026.03.002)
  • [L3] Current comorbidity indices inadequately identify patients who experience early adverse outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty. (10.5397/cise.2025.00584)
  • [L5] Strict operative technique during prosthesis implantation is crucial to obtain reliable and reproducible outcomes, as inadequate tuberosity repair or inappropriate humeral stem position are associated with poorer outcomes. (10.1016/j.otsr.2018.07.003)
  • [L4] Thus, preoperative planning using supine CT may inaccurately pose bones, with consequent effects on the surgical plan, the resultant shoulder biomechanics, and clinical outcomes. (10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.08.006)
  • [L4] The current study's findings suggest that postoperative changes in scapular kinematics following a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty positively impact shoulder function and patient-reported outcome measures. (10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100761)
  • [L4] The ST contribution to overall shoulder movement is significantly increased in patients with an rTSA compared with a healthy shoulder. (10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.018)
  • [L1] Early, active rehabilitation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is safe and effective, and may have early clinical benefits over a conservative, delayed mobilisation programme. (10.1177/1758573220937394)
  • [L5] Isolated humeral distalization caused dramatic increases in the muscle forces required to perform scapular-plane abduction, with joint reaction forces increasing correspondingly. (10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.055)
  • [Paper] A general decrease in the degree of rotational ROM was observed with higher glenohumeral abduction angles for both head designs. (10.1007/s00402-020-03587-0)
  • [L4] All movement planes showed significant differences in simulated range of motion when comparing protocols with and without adjustment for posture. (10.1302/0301-620x.106b11.bjj-2024-0110.r1)
  • [L1] There is an increased contribution of scapulothoracic rotation relative to glenohumeral motion throughout arm elevation following TSA compared to asymptomatic shoulders. (10.1016/j.jse.2025.08.010)
  • [L1] A high return to sport can be expected after total shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.028)
  • [L5] The study quantifies these biomechanical shifts but does not explicitly state a final clinical conclusion regarding the functional impact of these misalignments in the provided text. (10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.024)
  • [L4] Adjusting patient-specific scapula posture significantly impacts predicted impingement-free motion amplitudes and range of motion in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.05.022)
  • [L4] However, significant changes from the preoperative to postoperative conditions were not demonstrated for other kinematic parameters. (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.025)
  • [L4] This study offers a progression of exercises for patients after reverse shoulder arthroplasty based on increased muscle activity. (10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.050)
  • [L3] Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty use has increased among patients younger than 60 years of age, but this population experiences significantly higher rates of 90-day surgical complications compared to older patients. (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.020)
  • [L3] Clavicle hook plate fixation changes the scapular kinematics and scapulohumeral rhythm; thus, when clavicle hook plate fixation is complete, the implant should be promptly removed. (10.1007/s00264-018-4003-y)
  • [L3] Among shoulder arthroplasty patients who perceive their shoulder as normal, aTSA patients outperform rTSA patients with better motion and greater ability to return to work, return to sport, and perform higher demand activities without difficulty. (10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.010)
  • [L3] This large population-based study of over 45,000 shoulder arthroplasty cases identifies patient-level (age, comorbidity burden, ASA score and trauma indication) and system-level (weekend surgery and surgeon volume) variables that are independently associated with prolonged LOS following shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1177/17585732261425994)
  • [L5] Joint stability and abduction capability were compromised by more extensive rotator cuff tears, and subscapularis repair might be essential to enhancing biomechanical effectiveness, even in l-rTSA. (10.1016/j.jse.2025.03.027)
  • [L4] Although a low rate of humeral component loosening was observed, higher rates of complications and re-revision surgery were observed over time secondary to aseptic glenoid component loosening and instability. (10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.08.006)
  • [L3] Functional improvement was obtained after reimplantation of a reverse total shoulder prosthesis but was not seen after hemiarthroplasty and cement spacer. (10.1007/s11999.0000000000000049)
  • [L4] Despite initial bony osseointegration in the majority of cases, radiographic loosening over time remains a concern, potentially jeopardizing long-lasting fixation of this type of glenoid component when implanted in an off-label uncemented fashion. (10.1016/j.jse.2020.02.027)
  • [L3] The study confirms that radiographic measurements are generally valid for evaluating postoperative parameters in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1016/j.jse.2024.10.016)
  • [Case_report] Shoulder metallosis is an infrequent but significant potential complication in patients who have undergone shoulder arthroplasty with retained metal suture anchors. (10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.12.004)
  • [L4] The plateau of maximum recovery following rotator cuff repair occurred at 1 year with high satisfaction rates at all time points. (10.1016/j.arthro.2017.04.033)
  • [L1] Newer regimes permit immediate shoulder mobilization but may not be applied to every patient. (10.1177/17585732221144007)
  • [L4] Preoperative shoulder CT may be associated with a small but quantifiable projected cancer risk most pronounced in younger women. (10.1177/17585732261453604)
  • [L3] Intraoperative TXA does not improve ROM or pain after TSA. (10.5435/jaaos-d-24-00737)
  • [L4] Return to sports after reverse shoulder arthroplasty is possible and highly frequent. (10.1136/jisakos-2020-000581)
  • [Paper] Ultrasound imaging is an efficient, easy to use, and inexpensive tool for the diagnosis and management of the painful shoulder, with advantages over other modalities for evaluating the postoperative shoulder. (10.1016/j.otsr.2018.07.011)
  • [L3] Tomosynthesis may be a new and effective modality for evaluating glenoid loosening. (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.003)
  • [L3] While its applicability in standard cases is debatable for experienced shoulder surgeons, it could prove valuable for patients with severe bone defects. (10.1016/j.jseint.2024.11.009)
  • [L3] Patients can be counseled that they can expect to successfully return to sporting and recreational activities following surgical reconstruction of their shoulder. (10.1177/2325967117s00296)
  • [L3] Elevated preoperative INR is associated with increased risk of postoperative complications following total shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1177/17585732221088974)
  • [L4] Routine radiographs are overused and typically do not lead to any changes in asymptomatic patients in the first 2 years after TSA. (10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.010)
  • [L3] Revision rates and patient-reported outcomes are similar between cemented and uncemented humeral stems. (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.10.009)
  • [L5] Instability is a challenging complication with high failure rates after revision procedures, prompting a movement toward reverse shoulder arthroplasty, though this may not be ideal for all patients. (10.5435/jaaos-d-23-01072)
  • [L3] The Latarjet procedure was associated with the highest odds of future total shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1177/2325967125s00104)
  • [L3] Patients from areas of high social deprivation had increased rates of humeral fracture and dislocation following primary total shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0785.r1)
  • [L3] The results of this study support the use of cefazolin monotherapy as the current standard for patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.001)
  • [L5] Pseudoaneurysm after shoulder arthroplasty should be acknowledged as an uncommon but possible complication. (10.1177/17585732221077968)
  • [L2] Testosterone use is associated with a higher risk of both infection-related and all-cause reoperations after total shoulder arthroplasty. (10.1016/j.jseint.2026.101634)
  • [L3] Perioperative testosterone use was associated with a significantly higher risk of PJI following primary TSA, but no differences were found in rates of other major complications including revision rates, dislocation, aseptic loosening, periprosthetic fracture, and stiffness. (10.1177/17585732261437972)

See Also

References

[1] Consensus on long-term follow-up and surveillance of elective primary shoulder arthroplasty using a real-time Delphi technique. Shoulder & Elbow. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17585732251356963

[2] Shoulder arthroplasty to address the sequelae of anterior instability arthropathy and stabilization procedures: systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03400-y

[3] Retrospective, single-centre analysis comparing clinical outcomes of reverse total shoulder replacement for fracture, degenerative changes and revision procedure. 2025.

[4] Outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with prior anterior shoulder instability: minimum 5-year follow-up. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.07.005

[5] Impact of tobacco usage on readmission and complication rates following shoulder replacement surgery: A study of 164,527 patients. Shoulder & Elbow. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/17585732221102393

[6] Same reimbursement, different cost: risk factors for high-cost total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.055

[7] Exactech Equinoxe anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff in patients with no glenoid deformity. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.01.038

[8] What Factors are Predictive of Patient-reported Outcomes? A Prospective Study of 337 Shoulder Arthroplasties. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2016. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-016-4990-1

[9] Return to Play After Shoulder Replacement Surgery. Clinics in Sports Medicine. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2018.06.002

[10] Early outcomes after first reverse total shoulder arthroplasty better prognosticate contralateral success compared with early outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.10.007

[11] Glenoid exposure in total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.10.008

[12] Objective Measures for Assessing Readiness to Return to Sport After Shoulder Instability Procedures Are Not Standardized: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100978

[13] Perioperative complications and readmission rates following total shoulder arthroplasty in patients aged 90 and older. Shoulder & Elbow. 2024. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241269174

[14] Why has reverse total shoulder arthroplasty become the procedure of choice for primary shoulder arthroplasty?. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.08.009

[15] Variation in reverse shoulder replacement surgery: A survey of UK shoulder surgeons. Shoulder & Elbow. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/17585732261437401

[16] Revision of total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2013. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.11.010

[17] The impact of policy changes to outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty on patients, surgeons, and hospitals. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.08.003

[18] Long-term functional and radiographic outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using an all-polyethylene cemented glenoid component with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.03.036

[19] Return to Outdoorsman Sports After Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/23259671251326076

[20] Does the retention of osseointegrated prosthetic implants during the surgical management of chronic infections following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) influence functional outcomes without impacting the efficacy of the infection treatment?. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102906

[21] Can Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System estimate high-impact chronic pain after total shoulder arthroplasty?. JSES International. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.07.005

[22] The impact of gender on outcomes following anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.035

[23] Preoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography bone density measures provide objective bone quality classifications for stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.005

[24] Prospective midterm results of a new convertible glenoid component in anatomic shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03454-y

[25] Factors associated with higher inpatient hospitalization costs and improvements in shoulder-specific patient-reported outcomes following revision shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder & Elbow. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/17585732251404026

[26] Continuously monitoring shoulder motion after total shoulder arthroplasty: maximum elevation and time spent above 90° of elevation are critical metrics to monitor. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.01.003

[27] Rehabilitation following Reverse Total Shoulder Replacement. Shoulder & Elbow. 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-5740.2011.00138.x

[28] Health care resource utilization in the 2 years prior to total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.033

[29] The 50 most-cited articles in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder & Elbow. 2023. DOI: 10.1177/17585732231155123

[30] What treatment for periprosthetic shoulder infection? Results from a multicentre retrospective series. International Orthopaedics. 2012. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-011-1467-4

[31] Robotic-assisted baseplate preparation in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: surgical technique and contemporary review. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.08.013

[32] Biomechanical Changes After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of Advanced Measurement Technologies. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2026.03.002

[33] Current comorbidity indices inadequately identify patients who experience early adverse outcomes following total shoulder arthroplasty. Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow. 2025. DOI: 10.5397/cise.2025.00584

[34] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty in recent proximal humerus fractures. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.07.003

[35] Shoulder joint angles in supine and upright imaging of the preoperative reverse total shoulder arthroplasty patient. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.08.006

[36] Effect of Glenosphere Lateralization or Inferiorization and Humeral Offset on Range of Motion after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Robotic Assessment. Journal of ISAKOS. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2025.100761

[37] Involvement of the scapulothoracic articulation after well-functioning reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.018

[38] A randomised trial comparing two rehabilitation approaches following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder & Elbow. 2020. DOI: 10.1177/1758573220937394

[39] Isolated humeral distalization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biorobotic shoulder simulator study. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.055

[40] Rotational range of motion of elliptical and spherical heads in shoulder arthroplasty: a dynamic biomechanical evaluation. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03587-0

[41] SECEC Grammont Award 2024: The critical role of posture adjustment for range of motion simulation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty preoperative planning. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2024. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b11.bjj-2024-0110.r1

[42] Impact of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty on scapulohumeral rhythm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.08.010

[43] Why do patients not return to sports or work after anatomical or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review and meta-analysis. JSES International. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.028

[44] Varus-valgus alignment of humeral short stem in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: does it really matter?. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.11.024

[45] Predicted impingement-free motion amplitudes in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty differs between supine computed tomography and standing biplanar x-ray imaging: a pilot study. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.05.022

[46] Do shoulder kinematics change after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty?. JSES International. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.025

[47] Electromyographic analysis of selected shoulder muscles during shoulder rehabilitation exercises in patients after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2024. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.050

[48] Increasing use of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in younger adults despite higher complication rates. JSES International. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.020

[49] Evaluation of three-dimensional in vivo scapular kinematics and scapulohumeral rhythm between shoulders with a clavicle hook plate and contralateral healthy shoulders. International Orthopaedics. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-018-4003-y

[50] Evaluation of new normal after shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.02.010

[51] Predictors of prolonged length of stay in shoulder arthroplasty: A study using the National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics for England. Shoulder & Elbow. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/17585732261425994

[52] Biomechanical effects of different rotator cuff tear conditions and mediolateral offset in lateralized reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (Coralis Reverse Shoulder System). Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.03.027

[55] Cement-within-cement technique in revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: complications, reoperations, and revision rates at 5-year mean follow-up. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.08.006

[56] Staged Revision With Antibiotic Spacers for Shoulder Prosthetic Joint Infections Yields High Infection Control. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000049

[57] Clinical and radiographic outcomes of an all-polyethylene fluted central peg glenoid component, implanted utilizing an off-label, uncemented technique, at a minimum 5-year follow-up. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2020. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.02.027

[58] The validity of radiographic measurements compared to 3-dimensional-surface model-based measurements in shoulders with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.10.016

[59] Metallosis after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty resulting from contact with retained metallic suture anchors: a case report. JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.12.004

[60] Speed of Recovery After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.04.033

[61] Can we accelerate rehabilitation following reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A systematic review. Shoulder & Elbow. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/17585732221144007

[62] Temporal trends and estimated lifetime attributable radiation risk of preoperative planning computed tomography for primary shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder & Elbow. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/17585732261453604

[64] Does Tranexamic Acid Improve Early Postoperative Shoulder Motion After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2024. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-24-00737

[65] Return to sport after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is highly frequent: a systematic review. Journal of ISAKOS. 2021. DOI: 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000581

[67] An orthopaedic surgeon's guide to ultrasound imaging of the healthy, pathological and postoperative shoulder. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.07.011

[68] Short-term results of a hybrid ingrowth glenoid in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a radiographic analysis for radiolucent lines and osteointegration using tomosynthesis. JSES International. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.05.003

[69] Navigation increases the accuracy of glenoid component implantation in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in shoulders with severe glenoid wear: a comparative cohort study. JSES International. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.11.009

[70] Return to Recreational Sporting Activities Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2017. DOI: 10.1177/2325967117s00296

[71] The influence of elevated international normalized ratio on complications following total shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder & Elbow. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/17585732221088974

[72] Utility of radiographs for asymptomatic patients following primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.010

[73] Do uncemented humeral components perform better than cemented humeral components in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fracture? A New Zealand Joint Registry study. JSES International. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.10.009

[77] Instability and the Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 2024. DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-23-01072

[78] Paper 47: Subsequent Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Following Common Shoulder Stabilization and Reconstructive Procedures. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. 2025. DOI: 10.1177/2325967125s00104

[79] Higher complication rates following primary total shoulder arthroplasty in patients presenting from areas of higher social deprivation. The Bone & Joint Journal. 2024. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.106b2.bjj-2023-0785.r1

[80] Non-cefazolin antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with increased rates of acute infectious, medical, and surgical complications following primary total shoulder arthroplasty: a database study. JSES International. 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.001

[81] Unexpected complication after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Brachial artery pseudoaneurysm: A case report. Shoulder & Elbow. 2022. DOI: 10.1177/17585732221077968

[82] Prescription testosterone is associated with increased risk of infection-related and all-cause reoperations after primary total shoulder arthroplasty in male patients. JSES International. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2026.101634

[83] Perioperative testosterone therapy linked to higher 5-year risk of periprosthetic joint infection without increased 90-day major complications or revision rates in total shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder & Elbow. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/17585732261437972

Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0

CC Creative Commons licence
BY Attribution — you must credit the source
NC NonCommercial — not for commercial use

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Creative Commons Corporation ("Creative Commons") is not a law firm and does not provide legal services or legal advice. Distribution of Creative Commons public licenses does not create a lawyer-client or other relationship. Creative Commons makes its licenses and related information available on an "as-is" basis. Creative Commons gives no warranties regarding its licenses, any material licensed under their terms and conditions, or any related information. Creative Commons disclaims all liability for damages resulting from their use to the fullest extent possible.

Using Creative Commons Public Licenses

Creative Commons public licenses provide a standard set of terms and conditions that creators and other rights holders may use to share original works of authorship and other material subject to copyright and certain other rights specified in the public license below. The following considerations are for informational purposes only, are not exhaustive, and do not form part of our licenses.

Considerations for licensors: Our public licenses are intended for use by those authorized to give the public permission to use material in ways otherwise restricted by copyright and certain other rights. Our licenses are irrevocable. Licensors should read and understand the terms and conditions of the license they choose before applying it. Licensors should also secure all rights necessary before applying our licenses so that the public can reuse the material as expected. Licensors should clearly mark any material not subject to the license. This includes other CC- licensed material, or material used under an exception or limitation to copyright. More considerations for licensors: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensors

Considerations for the public: By using one of our public licenses, a licensor grants the public permission to use the licensed material under specified terms and conditions. If the licensor's permission is not necessary for any reason--for example, because of any applicable exception or limitation to copyright--then that use is not regulated by the license. Our licenses grant only permissions under copyright and certain other rights that a licensor has authority to grant. Use of the licensed material may still be restricted for other reasons, including because others have copyright or other rights in the material. A licensor may make special requests, such as asking that all changes be marked or described. Although not required by our licenses, you are encouraged to respect those requests where reasonable. More considerations for the public: wiki.creativecommons.org/Considerations_for_licensees

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License

By exercising the Licensed Rights (defined below), You accept and agree to be bound by the terms and conditions of this Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International Public License ("Public License"). To the extent this Public License may be interpreted as a contract, You are granted the Licensed Rights in consideration of Your acceptance of these terms and conditions, and the Licensor grants You such rights in consideration of benefits the Licensor receives from making the Licensed Material available under these terms and conditions.

Section 1 -- Definitions.

a. Adapted Material means material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights that is derived from or based upon the Licensed Material and in which the Licensed Material is translated, altered, arranged, transformed, or otherwise modified in a manner requiring permission under the Copyright and Similar Rights held by the Licensor. For purposes of this Public License, where the Licensed Material is a musical work, performance, or sound recording, Adapted Material is always produced where the Licensed Material is synched in timed relation with a moving image.

b. Adapter's License means the license You apply to Your Copyright and Similar Rights in Your contributions to Adapted Material in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Public License.

c. Copyright and Similar Rights means copyright and/or similar rights closely related to copyright including, without limitation, performance, broadcast, sound recording, and Sui Generis Database Rights, without regard to how the rights are labeled or categorized. For purposes of this Public License, the rights specified in Section 2(b)(1)-(2) are not Copyright and Similar Rights.

d. Effective Technological Measures means those measures that, in the absence of proper authority, may not be circumvented under laws fulfilling obligations under Article 11 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty adopted on December 20, 1996, and/or similar international agreements.

e. Exceptions and Limitations means fair use, fair dealing, and/or any other exception or limitation to Copyright and Similar Rights that applies to Your use of the Licensed Material.

f. Licensed Material means the artistic or literary work, database, or other material to which the Licensor applied this Public License.

g. Licensed Rights means the rights granted to You subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, which are limited to all Copyright and Similar Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material and that the Licensor has authority to license.

h. Licensor means the individual(s) or entity(ies) granting rights under this Public License.

i. NonCommercial means not primarily intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation. For purposes of this Public License, the exchange of the Licensed Material for other material subject to Copyright and Similar Rights by digital file-sharing or similar means is NonCommercial provided there is no payment of monetary compensation in connection with the exchange.

j. Share means to provide material to the public by any means or process that requires permission under the Licensed Rights, such as reproduction, public display, public performance, distribution, dissemination, communication, or importation, and to make material available to the public including in ways that members of the public may access the material from a place and at a time individually chosen by them.

k. Sui Generis Database Rights means rights other than copyright resulting from Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 1996 on the legal protection of databases, as amended and/or succeeded, as well as other essentially equivalent rights anywhere in the world.

l. You means the individual or entity exercising the Licensed Rights under this Public License. Your has a corresponding meaning.

Section 2 -- Scope.

a. License grant.

1. Subject to the terms and conditions of this Public License, the Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive, irrevocable license to exercise the Licensed Rights in the Licensed Material to:

a. reproduce and Share the Licensed Material, in whole or in part, for NonCommercial purposes only; and

b. produce, reproduce, and Share Adapted Material for NonCommercial purposes only.

2. Exceptions and Limitations. For the avoidance of doubt, where Exceptions and Limitations apply to Your use, this Public License does not apply, and You do not need to comply with its terms and conditions.

3. Term. The term of this Public License is specified in Section 6(a).

4. Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in all media and formats whether now known or hereafter created, and to make technical modifications necessary to do so. The Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any right or authority to forbid You from making technical modifications necessary to exercise the Licensed Rights, including technical modifications necessary to circumvent Effective Technological Measures. For purposes of this Public License, simply making modifications authorized by this Section 2(a) (4) never produces Adapted Material.

5. Downstream recipients.

a. Offer from the Licensor -- Licensed Material. Every recipient of the Licensed Material automatically receives an offer from the Licensor to exercise the Licensed Rights under the terms and conditions of this Public License.

b. No downstream restrictions. You may not offer or impose any additional or different terms or conditions on, or apply any Effective Technological Measures to, the Licensed Material if doing so restricts exercise of the Licensed Rights by any recipient of the Licensed Material.

6. No endorsement. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be construed as permission to assert or imply that You are, or that Your use of the Licensed Material is, connected with, or sponsored, endorsed, or granted official status by, the Licensor or others designated to receive attribution as provided in Section 3(a)(1)(A)(i).

b. Other rights.

1. Moral rights, such as the right of integrity, are not licensed under this Public License, nor are publicity, privacy, and/or other similar personality rights; however, to the extent possible, the Licensor waives and/or agrees not to assert any such rights held by the Licensor to the limited extent necessary to allow You to exercise the Licensed Rights, but not otherwise.

2. Patent and trademark rights are not licensed under this Public License.

3. To the extent possible, the Licensor waives any right to collect royalties from You for the exercise of the Licensed Rights, whether directly or through a collecting society under any voluntary or waivable statutory or compulsory licensing scheme. In all other cases the Licensor expressly reserves any right to collect such royalties, including when the Licensed Material is used other than for NonCommercial purposes.

Section 3 -- License Conditions.

Your exercise of the Licensed Rights is expressly made subject to the following conditions.

a. Attribution.

1. If You Share the Licensed Material (including in modified form), You must:

a. retain the following if it is supplied by the Licensor with the Licensed Material:

i. identification of the creator(s) of the Licensed Material and any others designated to receive attribution, in any reasonable manner requested by the Licensor (including by pseudonym if designated);

ii. a copyright notice;

iii. a notice that refers to this Public License;

iv. a notice that refers to the disclaimer of warranties;

v. a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable;

b. indicate if You modified the Licensed Material and retain an indication of any previous modifications; and

c. indicate the Licensed Material is licensed under this Public License, and include the text of, or the URI or hyperlink to, this Public License.

2. You may satisfy the conditions in Section 3(a)(1) in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share the Licensed Material. For example, it may be reasonable to satisfy the conditions by providing a URI or hyperlink to a resource that includes the required information.

3. If requested by the Licensor, You must remove any of the information required by Section 3(a)(1)(A) to the extent reasonably practicable.

4. If You Share Adapted Material You produce, the Adapter's License You apply must not prevent recipients of the Adapted Material from complying with this Public License.

Section 4 -- Sui Generis Database Rights.

Where the Licensed Rights include Sui Generis Database Rights that apply to Your use of the Licensed Material:

a. for the avoidance of doubt, Section 2(a)(1) grants You the right to extract, reuse, reproduce, and Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database for NonCommercial purposes only;

b. if You include all or a substantial portion of the database contents in a database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights, then the database in which You have Sui Generis Database Rights (but not its individual contents) is Adapted Material; and

c. You must comply with the conditions in Section 3(a) if You Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 4 supplements and does not replace Your obligations under this Public License where the Licensed Rights include other Copyright and Similar Rights.

Section 5 -- Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitation of Liability.

a. UNLESS OTHERWISE SEPARATELY UNDERTAKEN BY THE LICENSOR, TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, THE LICENSOR OFFERS THE LICENSED MATERIAL AS-IS AND AS-AVAILABLE, AND MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND CONCERNING THE LICENSED MATERIAL, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, STATUTORY, OR OTHER. THIS INCLUDES, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WARRANTIES OF TITLE, MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, ABSENCE OF LATENT OR OTHER DEFECTS, ACCURACY, OR THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF ERRORS, WHETHER OR NOT KNOWN OR DISCOVERABLE. WHERE DISCLAIMERS OF WARRANTIES ARE NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS DISCLAIMER MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

b. TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE, IN NO EVENT WILL THE LICENSOR BE LIABLE TO YOU ON ANY LEGAL THEORY (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, NEGLIGENCE) OR OTHERWISE FOR ANY DIRECT, SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY, OR OTHER LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS PUBLIC LICENSE OR USE OF THE LICENSED MATERIAL, EVEN IF THE LICENSOR HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSSES, COSTS, EXPENSES, OR DAMAGES. WHERE A LIMITATION OF LIABILITY IS NOT ALLOWED IN FULL OR IN PART, THIS LIMITATION MAY NOT APPLY TO YOU.

c. The disclaimer of warranties and limitation of liability provided above shall be interpreted in a manner that, to the extent possible, most closely approximates an absolute disclaimer and waiver of all liability.

Section 6 -- Term and Termination.

a. This Public License applies for the term of the Copyright and Similar Rights licensed here. However, if You fail to comply with this Public License, then Your rights under this Public License terminate automatically.

b. Where Your right to use the Licensed Material has terminated under Section 6(a), it reinstates:

1. automatically as of the date the violation is cured, provided it is cured within 30 days of Your discovery of the violation; or

2. upon express reinstatement by the Licensor.

For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 6(b) does not affect any right the Licensor may have to seek remedies for Your violations of this Public License.

c. For the avoidance of doubt, the Licensor may also offer the Licensed Material under separate terms or conditions or stop distributing the Licensed Material at any time; however, doing so will not terminate this Public License.

d. Sections 1, 5, 6, 7, and 8 survive termination of this Public License.

Section 7 -- Other Terms and Conditions.

a. The Licensor shall not be bound by any additional or different terms or conditions communicated by You unless expressly agreed.

b. Any arrangements, understandings, or agreements regarding the Licensed Material not stated herein are separate from and independent of the terms and conditions of this Public License.

Section 8 -- Interpretation.

a. For the avoidance of doubt, this Public License does not, and shall not be interpreted to, reduce, limit, restrict, or impose conditions on any use of the Licensed Material that could lawfully be made without permission under this Public License.

b. To the extent possible, if any provision of this Public License is deemed unenforceable, it shall be automatically reformed to the minimum extent necessary to make it enforceable. If the provision cannot be reformed, it shall be severed from this Public License without affecting the enforceability of the remaining terms and conditions.

c. No term or condition of this Public License will be waived and no failure to comply consented to unless expressly agreed to by the Licensor.

d. Nothing in this Public License constitutes or may be interpreted as a limitation upon, or waiver of, any privileges and immunities that apply to the Licensor or You, including from the legal processes of any jurisdiction or authority.

Creative Commons is not a party to its public licenses. Notwithstanding, Creative Commons may elect to apply one of its public licenses to material it publishes and in those instances will be considered the “Licensor.” The text of the Creative Commons public licenses is dedicated to the public domain under the CC0 Public Domain Dedication. Except for the limited purpose of indicating that material is shared under a Creative Commons public license or as otherwise permitted by the Creative Commons policies published at creativecommons.org/policies, Creative Commons does not authorize the use of the trademark "Creative Commons" or any other trademark or logo of Creative Commons without its prior written consent including, without limitation, in connection with any unauthorized modifications to any of its public licenses or any other arrangements, understandings, or agreements concerning use of licensed material. For the avoidance of doubt, this paragraph does not form part of the public licenses.

Creative Commons may be contacted at creativecommons.org.